| 1. |
- Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, et al.
(författare)
-
Contests as innovation intermediaries in open data markets
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Information Polity. - : I O S Press. - 1875-8754 .- 1570-1255. ; 19:3-4, s. 247-262
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Innovation contests are becoming popular instruments for stimulating development of digital services using open data. However, experience indicates that only a limited number of the results developed during these events become viable digital services attracting a significant user base. To further deepen our understanding of the role, design and function of innovation contests in open data markets, we conducted a survey of the websites of 33 digital innovation contests. The results of the survey show that organizers design digital innovation contests to function as intermediaries for open data innovation. By analyzing the activities performed by organizers we found several examples of how innovation contests support the participants in designing, implementing and providing services after the contests are concluded. We contribute with a key design element and attributes for the post-contest process of digital innovation contests, which adds to existing key design elements. For future research we suggest to further study open data markets and the intermediary role of digital innovation contests. Moreover we propose to develop guidelines and tools for organizers of digital innovation contests to design contests that better meet the needs of a particular open data market.
|
|
| 2. |
- Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, et al.
(författare)
-
What happens next? : A survey of the afterlife of innovation contests
- 2014
-
Ingår i: Proceedings of 2014 Pre-ECIS Workshop Rethinking Information Systems in the Public Sector. - : Association for Information Systems.
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Innovation contests are becoming popular instruments for stimulating development of digital services using open data. However, experience indicates that only a limited number of the results developed during these events become viable digital services attracting a significant user base. Hence, an unresolved question is how organizers choose to support the service development process after the contest is concluded. To further deepen our knowledge about the design of digital innovation contests and the support for the processes after the contests are concluded, we conducted a survey of the websites of 33 digital innovation contests.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Juell-Skielse, Gustaf, et al.
(författare)
-
What happens next? – A survey of the afterlife of innovation contests
- 2014
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Innovation contests are becoming popular instruments for stimulating development of digital services using open data. However, experience indicates that only a limited number of the results developed during these events become viable digital services attracting a significant user base. Hence, an unresolved question is how organizers choose to support the service development process after the contest is concluded. To further deepen our knowledge about the design of digital innovation contests and the support for the processes after the contests are concluded, we conducted a survey of the websites of 33 digital innovation contests. The results of the survey show that the majority of the contests provide a very low level of support or no support at all to the participants after the contests are concluded. Still, during our classification of support actions presented in the survey we also found several examples of how innovation contests choose to support the participants in designing, implementing and providing services after the contests are concluded. We contribute with a key design element and attributes for the post-contest process of digital innovation contests, which adds to existing design elements. Our conclusion is that very few innovation contests take the post-contest process into account. Yet there are examples where organizers of contests bear in mind their own important role in the following service innovation process and provide for example funding and development support to participants. For future research we propose to conduct a more thorough survey including interviews with organizers and participants.
|
|
| 5. |
- Guyot-Tephany, Josselin, et al.
(författare)
-
Two decades of research on ocean multi-use : achievements, challenges and the need for transdisciplinarity
- 2024
-
Ingår i: npj Ocean Sustainability. - : Springer Nature. - 2731-426X. ; 3:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper offers a comprehensive, analytical, and critically informed overview of the current state of ocean multi-use research. It delves into the origins, trajectory, and driving forces behind this emerging research field, all within the broader context of investigations addressing the management of increasingly diverse and intensifying activities at sea. The Bibliometrix R package is employed to analyze the social, geographical, and conceptual dimensions of multi-use scientific production. The results obtained are then compared to a larger corpus of publications focusing on both multiple-use Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) and Marine Spatial Planning (MSP). Finally, the paper addresses research gaps, with a particular emphasis on the transdisciplinary challenges associated with translating this new marine policy concept into practical implementation and extending its application beyond European seas.
|
|
