| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
| 11. |
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
- El Alaoui, S, et al.
(författare)
-
Does internet-based cognitive behaviour therapy reduce healthcare costs and resource use in treatment of social anxiety disorder? A cost-minimisation analysis conducted alongside a randomised controlled trial
- 2017
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 7:9, s. e017053-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Social anxiety disorder (SAD) can be effectively treated with internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (ICBT), but studies on long-term cost minimisation from a healthcare provider perspective in comparison to an evidence-based control treatment of therapeutic equivalence are lacking. The objective of the study was to determine whether ICBT reduces healthcare costs and use of healthcare resources compared with cognitive behavioural group therapy (CBGT).DesignA cost-minimisation study alongside a randomised controlled trial where participants (n=126) with SAD were randomised to ICBT or to CBGT. Costs measured from a healthcare provider perspective were estimated using time-driven activity-based costing alongside health status over 4 years from baseline measured with EQ-5D.SettingA psychiatric outpatient clinic in Stockholm, Sweden.ParticipantsParticipants were 126 individuals with SAD.Primary outcome measuresChanges in EQ-5D and costs.InterventionsParticipants received either CBGT or ICBT for a duration of 15 weeks.ResultsICBT minimised healthcare costs and demonstrated health improvements within the non-inferiority margin. Assuming a practical work capacity for personnel varying between 100%, 80% and 50% of theoretical full capacity, the cost for ICBT varied in the range between 400€, 463€ and 654 €, while the cost for CBGT varied between 699€, 806€ and 1134€. Within-group effect size was −0.36 (95% CI −0.70 to −0.01) for ICBT and −0.25 (95% CI −0.60 to 0.10) for CBGT. Mean use of effective psychologist time in ICBT was 189.60 (SD=53.77) minutes compared with 499.78 (SD=30.91) in the CBGT group.ConclusionsIn treatment of SAD, ICBT is equally effective but is associated with more efficient staff utilisation and less costs compared with CBGT. From a healthcare provider perspective, ICBT is an advantageous treatment option.Trial registration number
|
|
| 14. |
- Hesser, Hugo, 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
Behavioral avoidance moderates the effect of exposure therapy for irritable bowel syndrome: A secondary analysis of results from a randomized component trial
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Behaviour Research and Therapy. - : Elsevier BV. - 0005-7967 .- 1873-622X. ; 141
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Past research has failed to identify consistent moderators of outcomes in psychological treatments for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). The aim of this study was to test previously identified mediators as potential moderators of the effects of exposure therapy on IBS symptoms in a previously published randomized component trial. In total, 309 participants with IBS were randomized to internet-delivered cognitive behavioral treatment that included exposure (ICBT) or to the same treatment protocol without exposure (ICBT-WE) and were asked to report on gastrointestinal symptoms at pretreatment, posttreatment and weekly during the treatment. Pretreatment scores of The Visceral Sensitivity Index (VSI) and The Irritable Bowel Syndrome Behavioral Responses Questionnaire (IBS-BRQ) (i.e., gastrointestinal anxiety and avoidance behavior) were evaluated as predictors and moderators. Piecewise latent growth curve models were employed to evaluate moderators during distinct phases of the trial, prior to and following the onset of exposure in ICBT. Results revealed that pretreatment scores on IBS-BRQ (avoidance) moderated the effect of exposure therapy during the specific phase in which exposure was implemented in ICBT, with higher avoidance scores linked to stronger positive effects of exposure. VSI did not serve as predictor nor moderator. Adding exposure to CBT seems to be especially important for persons with moderate to high levels of avoidance behaviors in order to reduce gastrointestinal symptoms.
|
|
| 15. |
- Hesser, Hugo, 1982-, et al.
(författare)
-
How Does Exposure Therapy Work? A Comparison Between Generic and Gastrointestinal Anxiety-Specific Mediators in a Dismantling Study of Exposure Therapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. - : American Psychological Association (APA). - 0022-006X .- 1939-2117. ; 86:3, s. 254-267
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: Systematic exposure is potentially an effective treatment procedure for treating irritable bowel syndrome (IBS), but little is known about the processes by which it achieves its effect on outcome. The aim of this study was to identify mediators in a previously published randomized dismantling trial in which participants with IBS were randomized to Internet-delivered cognitive-behavioral treatment (ICBT) that incorporated systematic exposure or to the same treatment protocol without exposure (ICBT-WE). Method: Weekly measurements of gastrointestinal anxiety-specific process variables (behavioral avoidance, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety) based on the gastrointestinal symptom-specific anxiety model, generic process variables (self-efficacy and mindful nonreactivity), and treatment outcome (IBS symptoms) were obtained from 309 participants with IBS. Growth models and cross-lagged panel models, estimated within structural equation modeling, were employed to evaluate mediators of outcome. Results: Parallel process growth modeling showed that behavioral avoidance, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, self-efficacy mediated the incremental effect of ICBT compared to ICBT-WE. The mediated effect of avoidance was stronger for individuals scoring high on the avoidance variable at 1st measurement point. Cross-lagged regression analyses with random effects revealed that behavioral avoidance and gastrointestinal-specific anxiety had a stronger effect on subsequent symptom change rather than vice versa, whereas mindful nonreactivity and self-efficacy displayed the opposite pattern. Conclusions: The evidence collectively provided support for the hypothesis that exposure for IBS achieves its positive results by virtue of changing gastrointestinal anxiety-specific processes rather than generic processes. IBS-specific behavioral avoidance emerged as the most clear-cut mediator of the specific effect of exposure on outcome.
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
- Kern, D, et al.
(författare)
-
Brief self-guided digital intervention versus a comprehensive therapist-guided online cognitive behavioural therapy for atopic dermatitis: a trial protocol for a randomised non-inferiority trial
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMJ open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 13:2, s. e068908-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Our aim is to investigate whether a shortened digital self-care intervention is non-inferior to, and cost-effective compared with, a comprehensive and therapist-guided cognitive behavioural therapy treatment for atopic dermatitis (AD).Methods and analysisThis is a single-blind, randomised clinical non-inferiority trial at Karolinska Institutet, a medical university in Stockholm, Sweden. We will recruit 174 adult participants with AD through self-referral. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to the two experimental conditions. Participants randomised to guided care will receive internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy for 12 weeks. Participants randomised to digital self-care will have access to this self-guided intervention for 12 weeks. At post-treatment (primary endpoint), non-inferiority will be tested and resource use will be compared between the two treatment groups. Cost-effectiveness will be explored at 1-year follow-up. Potential mediators will be investigated. Data will be analysed intention to treat. We define non-inferiority as a three-point difference on the primary outcome measure (Patient-oriented Eczema Measure). Recruitment started in November 2022.Ethics and disseminationThis study is approved by the Swedish ethics authority (reg. no 2021-06704-01) and is preregistered at ClinicalTrials.gov. The study will be reported according to the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials statement for non-pharmacological trials. The results of the study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and disseminated to patient organisations and media.Trial registration numberNCT05517850.
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
- Lalouni, M., et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Online Cognitive Behavioral Therapy in Children With Functional Abdominal Pain Disorders
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1542-3565 .- 1542-7714. ; 17:11
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND & AIMS: Scalable and effective treatments are needed for children with functional abdominal pain disorders (FAPDs). We performed a randomized controlled trial of the efficacy and cost effectiveness of cognitive behavioral therapy delivered online (Internet-CBT) compared with usual therapy. METHODS: We studied children (age, 8-12 y) diagnosed with FAPDs, based on the Rome IV criteria, in Sweden from September 2016 through April 2017. The patients were assigned randomly to groups that received 10 weeks of therapist-guided, internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (Internet-CBT, n = 46) or treatment as usual (treatments within the health care and school systems, including medications and visits to doctors and other health care professionals; n = 44). The primary outcome was global child-rated gastrointestinal symptom severity assessed using the Pediatric Quality of Life Gastrointestinal Symptom scale. All outcomes were collected from September 2016 through January 2018. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, avoidance behaviors, and parental responses to children's symptoms. Societal costs and costs for health care consumption were collected during the treatment. RESULTS: Children who received Internet-CBT had a significantly larger improvement in gastrointestinal symptom severity with a medium effect size (Cohen's d = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.05-0.88; number needed to treat, 3.8) compared with children who received the treatment as usual. The children's quality of life, gastrointestinal-specific anxiety, avoidance behaviors, and parental responses to children's symptoms also improved significantly in the Internet-CBT group compared with the treatment as usual group. The effects of Internet-CBT persisted through 36 weeks of follow-up evaluation. Children who received Internet-CBT had significantly less health care use than children who received treatment as usual, with an average cost difference of US $137 (P = .011). We calculated a cost savings of US $1050 for every child treated with Internet-CBT compared with treatment as usual. CONCLUSIONS: In a randomized trial of pediatric patients with FAPDs, we found Internet-CBT to be clinically cost effective compared with treatment as usual. Internet-CBThas the potential to increase the availability of treatment for a number of patients and reduce health care costs.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
| 22. |
|
|
| 23. |
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
|
|
| 26. |
|
|
| 27. |
|
|
| 28. |
|
|
| 29. |
|
|
| 30. |
|
|
| 31. |
|
|
| 32. |
|
|
| 33. |
|
|
| 34. |
|
|
