| 1. |
- Buhl, Michael E.J., et al.
(författare)
-
Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Bacteroides fragilis isolated from blood cultures, Europe, 2022 (ReSuBacfrag)
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents. - 1872-7913.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundBacteroides fragilis is the most frequent cause of anaerobic bacteraemia. Although recent data suggest a rise in antimicrobial resistance (AMR) of this and other anaerobic bacteria, surveillance remains limited due to a lack of both data availability and comparability. However, a newly introduced standardised method for antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of anaerobic bacteria has made larger scale surveillance possible for the first time.AimTo investigate phenotypic AMR of Bacteroides fragilis isolates from bacteraemia across Europe in 2022.MethodsIn a multicentre approach, clinical microbiology laboratories in Europe were invited to contribute results of AST for Bacteroides fragilis blood culture isolates (including only the first isolate per patient and year). AST of a selection of four antibiotics was performed locally by participating laboratories in a prospective or retrospective manner, using the new EUCAST disc diffusion method on fastidious anaerobe agar (FAA-HB).ResultsA total of 16 European countries reported antimicrobial susceptibilities in 449 unique isolates of Bacteroides fragilis from blood cultures in 2022. Clindamycin demonstrated the highest resistance rates (20.9%, range 0 - 63.6%), followed by piperacillin-tazobactam (11.1%, 0 - 54.5%), meropenem (13.4%, 0 - 45.5%), and metronidazole (1.8%, 0 - 20.0%), all with wide variation between countries.ConclusionConsidering that the mean resistance rates across Europe were higher than expected for three of the four anti-anaerobic antibiotics under surveillance, both local AST of clinically relevant isolates of Bacteroides fragilis and continued surveillance on an international level is warranted.
|
|
| 2. |
- Margos, Gabriele, et al.
(författare)
-
Evidence of taxonomic bias in public databases: The example of the genus Borrelia
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Ticks and Tick-borne Diseases. - : ELSEVIER GMBH. - 1877-959X .- 1877-9603. ; 13:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The taxon names used in public databases are of critical importance in all areas of biology because they are needed for linking organisms to sequence data and other information. Since most users of taxonomic classifications may be unprepared for dealing with synonyms, the names that are preferred in such databases are of high impact. Using the genus Borrelia as an example, we here show how simplistic approaches for determining the preferred synonym may lead to biases regarding the preferences for taxonomic opinions. We highlight that in this and other cases where genera were split, for reverting to the previous "merged" genus it is neither possible nor necessary to generate validly published and legitimate names that are newer than those that were proposed as new combinations when the genus was split. The policy to always prefer the latest validly published name in a public database may thus render this database oblivious to reversals in taxonomic opinion. We emphasize that users of public databases should be aware of such potential shortcomings, and that curators of databases which provide nomenclatural information should be open-minded about taxonomic views expressed in the literature.
|
|
