| 1. |
- Ahnfelt, Emelie, et al.
(författare)
-
Lipiodol-based emulsions used for transarterial chemoembolization and drug delivery : Effects of composition on stability and product quality
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology. - : ELSEVIER. - 1773-2247. ; 53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Transarterial chemoembolization with emulsion-based formulations using doxorubicin hydrochloride (DOX) and Lipiodol (R) is the golden standard for the loco-regional treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, from a pharmaceutical quality perspective these emulsions are poorly characterized. In this study, clinically relevant Lipiodol (R)-based emulsions were characterized in terms of emulsion stability, continuous phase classification and droplet-size distribution. Also, the solubility of DOX in the different emulsion components and the distribution of DOX to the lipid phase were investigated. These are key features to investigate due to the claimed tumor-seeking properties of Lipiodol (R). The in vitro release of DOX was studied in a miniaturized dialysis method and an empirical release model was applied to adjust for the passage of DOX across the dialysis membrane. The most stable emulsion ( > 72 h) was classified as water-in-oil (w/o), had the highest distribution of DOX to the lipid phase (20%) and an aqueous-to-lipid phase ratio of 1:4. The composition of the aqueous phase was a mixture (v/v) of iohexol (85%) and water (15%). Emulsions containing iohexol and a high aqueousto-lipid phase ratio (1:2-1:4) displayed prolonged in vitro release profiles of DOX. This study further emphasizes the medical need to standardize these emulsion-based drug delivery systems.
|
|
| 2. |
- Dubbelboer, Ilse R., et al.
(författare)
-
A Model -Based Approach To Assessing the Importance of Intracellular Binding Sites in Doxorubicin Disposition
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Molecular Pharmaceutics. - : AMER CHEMICAL SOC. - 1543-8384 .- 1543-8392. ; 14:3, s. 686-698
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Doxorubicin is an anticancer agent, which binds reversibly to topoisomerase I and II, intercalates to DNA base pairs, and generates free radicals. Doxorubicin has a high tissue:plasma partition coefficient and high intracellular binding to the nucleus and other subcellular compartments. The metabolite doxorubicinol has an extensive tissue distribution. This porcine study investigated whether the traditional implementation of tissue binding, described by the tissue:plasma partition coefficient (K-p,K-t),could be used to appropriately analyze and/or simulate tissue doxorubicin and doxorubicinol concentrations in healthy pigs, when applying a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model approach, or whether intracellular binding is required in the semi-PBPK model. Two semi-PBPK models were developed and evaluated using doxorubicin and doxorubicinol concentrations in healthy pig blood, bile, and urine and kidney and liver tissues. In the generic semi-PBPK model, tissue binding was described using the conventional K-p,K-t approach. In the binding-specific semi-PBPK model, tissue binding was described using intracellular binding sites. The best semi-PBPK model was validated against a second data set of healthy pig blood and bile concentrations. Both models could be used for analysis and simulations of biliary and urinary excretion of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol and plasma doxorubicinol concentrations in pigs, but the binding-specific model was better at describing plasma doxorubicin concentrations. Porcine tissue concentrations were 400- to 1250-fold better captured by the binding-specific model. This model adequately predicted plasma doxorubicin concentration time and biliary doxorubicin excretion profiles against the validation data set. The semi-PBPK models applied were similarly effective for analysis of plasma concentrations and biliary and urinary excretion of doxorubicin and doxorubicinol in healthy pigs. Inclusion of intracellular binding in the doxorubicin semi-PBPK models was important to accurately describe tissue concentrations during in vivo conditions.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Lilienberg, Elsa, 1984-
(författare)
-
Biopharmaceutical Evaluation of Intra-arterial Drug-Delivery Systems for Liver Cancer : Investigations in healthy pigs and liver cancer patients
- 2015
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- There are currently two types of intra-arterial drug-delivery system (DDS) in clinical use in the palliative treatment of primary liver cancer. The chemotherapeutic drug doxorubicin (DOX) can be formulated into a drug-in-lipiodol emulsion (LIPDOX) or a microparticulate drug-eluting bead system (DEBDOX). To facilitate development of future DDSs, we need to understand the release and local distribution of drug from these DDSs into the complex, in vivo, pathological environment.The overall aim of this project was to assess and improve understanding of the in vivo release of DOX from LIPDOX and DEBDOX and its local disposition in the liver. These processes were investigated in detail in a multisampling-site, healthy pig model and in human patients with liver cancer. The mechanisms involved in DOX disposition were studied by examining potential interactions between DOX and lipiodol and/or cyclosporine A (CsA) in pigs. In this project, the main elimination pathway for DOX and its primary metabolite doxorubicinol (DOXol) was via bile; their extensive canalicular carrier-mediated transport (e.g. ATP-binding cassette transporters ABCB1, ABCC1, ABCC2 and ABCG2) was inhibited by CsA. CsA had no effect on the carbonyl and aldo-keto reductases responsible for the metabolism of DOX into DOXol. LIPDOX released DOX more rapidly and to a greater extent into the circulation than DEBDOX, which had only released 15% of the dose in patients after 24 hrs. The systemic exposure to DOX was lower for DEBDOX than for LIPDOX. Greater fractions of DOXol were formed in blood and bile with LIPDOX than with DEBDOX. This may have been because DOX was more widely distributed into regions with increased metabolic capacity or because of increased intracellular uptake when DOX was delivered in LIPDOX. The excipient lipiodol in the LIPDOX formulation did not interact with transporters, enzymes or membranes that would explain the increased cellular uptake of DOX.In conclusion, the release of DOX from DEBDOX is more controlled in vivo than that from LIPDOX, indicating that DEBDOX is a more robust pharmaceutical product. The formulations for future optimized DDSs should therefore be more similar to DEBDOX than to LIPDOX.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
