| 2. |
- Molnar-Gabor, Fruzsina, et al.
(författare)
-
Harmonization after the GDPR? Divergences in the rules for genetic and health data sharing in four member states and ways to overcome them by EU measures: insights from Germany, Greece, Latvia and Sweden
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Seminars in Cancer Biology. - : Elsevier. - 1044-579X .- 1096-3650. ; 84, s. 271-283
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The EU member states’ healthcare and health-related research sectors are both characterized by an emerging infrastructural coalescence on a national and European level. The culmination of this coalescence is the planned creation of a European Health Data Space, an EU-wide infrastructure for the processing of personal data for healthcare and for secondary uses such as scientific research. In contrast to growing technical interoperability, the legal framework for such integration is not yet defined in detail, particularly with regard to data protection law. Its development is accompanied by discussions about divergent member state implementations of the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) that affect data sharing between healthcare and scientific research actors and across various sectors driven by divergent processing purposes.The article presents four member states’ main rules on data sharing based on the respective provision of the GDPR in six health-related contexts regarding data sharing across the healthcare and research sector and between the main actors of those sectors. The striking differences are then evaluated from the perspective of their factual effect on European data sharing depending on the legal characteristics of the GDPR provisions they rely on. Against this backdrop, the planned regulatory measures for the setup of the European Health Data Space are introduced and evaluated with regard to further harmonization between member states’ laws and possibilities to overcome divergences in data protection rules relevant for European data sharing.The results of the analysis point to the conclusion that the destructive effect of divergent member state rules depends on the legal qualification of the EU provisions they rely on and that this qualification also determines which further EU regulatory measure would be the most effective to set the framework for the European Health Data Space.
|
|
| 4. |
- Stenzinger, Albrecht, et al.
(författare)
-
Implementation of precision medicine in healthcare—A European perspective
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Journal of Internal Medicine. - 0954-6820 .- 1365-2796. ; 294:4, s. 437-454
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- The technical development of high-throughput sequencing technologies and the parallel development of targeted therapies in the last decade have enabled a transition from traditional medicine to personalized treatment and care. In this way, by using comprehensive genomic testing, more effective treatments with fewer side effects are provided to each patient—that is, precision or personalized medicine (PM). In several European countries—such as in England, France, Denmark, and Spain—the governments have adopted national strategies and taken “top-down” decisions to invest in national infrastructure for PM. In other countries—such as Sweden, Germany, and Italy with regionally organized healthcare systems—the profession has instead taken “bottom-up” initiatives to build competence networks and infrastructure to enable equal access to PM. In this review, we summarize key learnings at the European level on the implementation process to establish sustainable governance and organization for PM at the regional, national, and EU/international levels. We also discuss critical ethical and legal aspects of implementing PM, and the importance of access to real-world data and performing clinical trials for evidence generation, as well as the need for improved reimbursement models, increased cross-disciplinary education and patient involvement. In summary, PM represents a paradigm shift, and modernization of healthcare and all relevant stakeholders—that is, healthcare, academia, policymakers, industry, and patients—must be involved in this system transformation to create a sustainable, non-siloed ecosystem for precision healthcare that benefits our patients and society at large.
|
|
