SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Montnemery P) "

Sökning: WFRF:(Montnemery P)

  • Resultat 1-6 av 6
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  •  
2.
  • Montnemery, Peter, et al. (författare)
  • Accuracy of a first diagnosis of asthma in primary health care.
  • 2002
  • Ingår i: Family Practice. - 1460-2229. ; 19:4, s. 365-368
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND: In a postal questionnaire study, the prevalence of asthma in southern Sweden has been found to be 5.5%. However, the register prevalence of asthma obtained from the medical records in the same municipality and age groups was found to be only 2.1%. OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to investigate whether the low register prevalence of asthma was caused by an underdiagnosis of asthma in primary health care and to validate a first diagnosis of asthma set by GPs in primary health care. METHODS: During a period of 3 months in 1997, all patients seeking care in the primary health care units of the municipality of Lund (population 171 877) with upper or lower airway infections, prolonged cough, allergic rhinitis, fatigue or a first positive diagnosis of asthma were recorded ( n = 3025). RESULTS: In the whole group of 3025 patients, 99 patients were found to have received a diagnosis of asthma for the first time during the study period. The diagnosis was verified in 52 of those 68 patients who attended a follow-up and examination by a respiratory physician. Among the remaining 2926 patients, 221 patients were selected randomly to constitute a control group. In this group, three patients were found to have asthma. Thus, the specificity of an asthma diagnosis set in primary health care was 0.99 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.99-1.00] and the sensitivity was 0.59 (95% CI 0.31-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: The GPs in this study were good at excluding those who did not have asthma (specificity 99%) but less good in correctly diagnosing those who actually had current asthma (sensitivity 59%), which suggests an underdiagnosis of asthma.
  •  
3.
  • Montnemery, Peter, et al. (författare)
  • Familial related risk-factors in the development of chronic bronchitis/emphysema as compared to asthma assessed in a postal survey
  • 2000
  • Ingår i: European Journal of Epidemiology. - 1573-7284. ; 16:11, s. 1003-1007
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • There is a lack of knowledge to which extent heredity or familial risk factors are involved in the development of chronic bronchitis/emphysema (CBE). Smoking is regarded as the most important risk factor, but only about 15% of smokers develop airway obstruction. We evaluated the importance of familial risk factors compared to smoking and ex-smoking using an epidemiological approach. In 1992, a postal questionnaire was distributed to a study sample. In all, 43 questions were asked, in a previously evaluated questionnaire, regarding respiratory symptoms, self-reported lung diseases, smoking habits and familial occurrence of chronic bronchitis and asthma. The questionnaire was sent to 12,073 adults living in the southernmost part of Sweden. The age range was 20-59 years with an equal gender distribution. The study sample was drawn from the population records. The questionnaire was answered by 8469 subjects (70.1%), of whom 392 subjects (4.6%) stated that they had or had had CBE and 469 subjects (5.5%) stated that they had or had had asthma. In a model with logistic regression using the five explanatory variables gender, age, familial occurrence for asthma, familial occurrence for CBE and current or ex-smoking the most important risk factors for CBE were familial occurrence for chronic bronchitis [Odds ratios (OR): 5.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 4.09-6.60, p = 0.000] and current or ex-smoking (OR: 1.74, 95% CI: 1.41-2.14, p = 0.000). The most important risk factors for asthma were familial occurrence for asthma (OR: 3.71, 95% CI: 3.06-4.51, p = 0.000) and current or ex-smoking (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.09-1.61, p = 0.004). We have found that familial occurrence for CBE in first degree relatives together with smoking is a stronger risk factor for the development of CBE than is smoking.
  •  
4.
  •  
5.
  • Montnemery, Peter, et al. (författare)
  • Prevalence of obstructive lung diseases and respiratory symptoms in relation to living environment and socio-economic group
  • 2001
  • Ingår i: Respiratory Medicine. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-3064 .- 0954-6111. ; 95:9, s. 744-752
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • We wanted to test whether living environment, occupation and social position are risk factors for asthma and chronic bronchitis/emphysema (CBE). The prevalence of bronchial asthma, CBE, respiratory symptoms and smoking habits in a random sample of 12,071 adults aged 20-59 years was assessed in a postal survey with a slightly modified questionnaire previously used in central and northern Sweden (The OLIN studies). Occupation was coded according to a socio-economic classification system. Six different living environment areas were defined; city-countryside, seaside-not seaside and living close to heavy traffic-not living close to heavy traffic. Multiple logistic regression analysis (forward conditional) was applied to estimate the association between the proposed set of risk factors and self-reported obstructive lung diseases and lower respiratory symptoms controlling for age, gender and smoking. After two reminders, the response rate was 70.1% (n=8469); 33.8% of the responders were smokers. In all, 469 subjects (5.5%) stated that they had asthma and 4.6% reported CBE. Besides smoking, which was a risk for both asthma and CBE, there were different risk patterns for self-reported asthma and CBE. In the economically active population there was a tendency that CBE was more common among 'unskilled and semi-skilled workers'. This fact was further emphasized when the population was merged into the two groups 'low social position' and 'middle/high social position', with 'low social position' as a risk for CBE (OR=1.35, 95% CI=1.06-1.72). No social risk factors were identified for asthma. Living close to heavy traffic was a risk factor for asthma (OR=1.29, 95% CI=1.02-1.62) but not for CBE. Apart from this no living environmental risk factors for obstructive pulmonary diseases were identified. Asthma symptoms and long-standing cough were more common among those subjects living close to heavy traffic compared to those not living close to heavy traffic. To conclude, low social position was a risk factor for CBE and living close to heavy traffic was a risk factor for asthma.
  •  
6.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-6 av 6

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy