| 1. |
- Begley, Cecily, 1954, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of an intervention to increase vaginal birth after caesarean section through enhanced women-centred care: The OptiBIRTH randomised trial (ISRCTN10612254)
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Triennial Congress.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Vaginal birth after a previous caesarean (VBAC) is a safe alternative to repeat caesarean section (CS), is the preferred option of most women and may reduce overall CS rates.1 However, VBAC rates vary; e.g., rates in Germany, Ireland and Italy are considerably lower (29-36%) than those in the Netherlands, Sweden and Finland (45-55%). Purpose/Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of an intervention to maximise VBAC rates. The OptiBIRTH Project was funded by a European Union Grant: FP7-HEALTH-2012-INNOVATION-1-HEALTH.2012.3.2-1. Agreement No:305208 Method: A cluster randomised trial was used. A sample size of 12 maternity units was required, each recruiting 120 consenting women, to detect an absolute 15% difference in successful VBACs (increase from 25% in control to 40% in intervention groups), using an ICC of 0.05, with power of >80% and an alpha of 0.05. To allow for loss to follow-up, 15 trial units were randomised across three countries with low VBAC rates (Germany, Ireland and Italy) and the trial commenced April 2014. An evidence-based intervention was introduced in all intervention sites. Control sites had usual care. Interim analysis by an independent Data Monitoring Committee at mid-point permitted continuation. Data were analysed using intention to treat. Key Findings: Recruitment closed October 2015, with the last babies born in December 2015, and data analysis will be completed in April 2016. The primary outcome, comparison of annual VBAC rates for each hospital before and after introduction of the intervention will be presented, and selected secondary outcomes for the recruited women including: mode of birth, perineal trauma, breastfeeding, uterine rupture, wound breakdown, perinatal mortality, Apgar scores, and admission to neonatal intensive care unit. Discussion: If the OptiBIRTH intervention increases VBAC rates safely, its introduction across Europe could prevent 160,000 unnecessary CSs every year, saving maternity services >€150 million annually and contributing to the normalisation of birth for thousands of women. References: 1 Cunningham et al (2010). National Institute of Health Consensus Development Conference Statement: Vaginal birth after caesarean. Obstet & Gynecol 115(6): 1279-1295. 2 EURO-PERISTAT 2008: CD006066.EURO-PERISTAT Project (2008). European Perinatal Health Report. (www.europeristat.com).
|
|
| 2. |
- Buckley, Sarah, et al.
(författare)
-
Maternal and newborn plasma oxytocin levels in response to maternal synthetic oxytocin administration during labour, birth and postpartum : a systematic review with implications for the function of the oxytocinergic system
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393. ; 23:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: The reproductive hormone oxytocin facilitates labour, birth and postpartum adaptations for women and newborns. Synthetic oxytocin is commonly given to induce or augment labour and to decrease postpartum bleeding.AIM: To systematically review studies measuring plasma oxytocin levels in women and newborns following maternal administration of synthetic oxytocin during labour, birth and/or postpartum and to consider possible impacts on endogenous oxytocin and related systems.METHODS: Systematic searches of PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo and Scopus databases followed PRISMA guidelines, including all peer-reviewed studies in languages understood by the authors. Thirty-five publications met inclusion criteria, including 1373 women and 148 newborns. Studies varied substantially in design and methodology, so classical meta-analysis was not possible. Therefore, results were categorized, analysed and summarised in text and tables.RESULTS: Infusions of synthetic oxytocin increased maternal plasma oxytocin levels dose-dependently; doubling the infusion rate approximately doubled oxytocin levels. Infusions below 10 milliunits per minute (mU/min) did not raise maternal oxytocin above the range observed in physiological labour. At high intrapartum infusion rates (up to 32 mU/min) maternal plasma oxytocin reached 2-3 times physiological levels. Postpartum synthetic oxytocin regimens used comparatively higher doses with shorter duration compared to labour, giving greater but transient maternal oxytocin elevations. Total postpartum dose was comparable to total intrapartum dose following vaginal birth, but post-caesarean dosages were higher. Newborn oxytocin levels were higher in the umbilical artery vs. umbilical vein, and both were higher than maternal plasma levels, implying substantial fetal oxytocin production in labour. Newborn oxytocin levels were not further elevated following maternal intrapartum synthetic oxytocin, suggesting that synthetic oxytocin at clinical doses does not cross from mother to fetus.CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic oxytocin infusion during labour increased maternal plasma oxytocin levels 2-3-fold at the highest doses and was not associated with neonatal plasma oxytocin elevations. Therefore, direct effects from synthetic oxytocin transfer to maternal brain or fetus are unlikely. However, infusions of synthetic oxytocin in labour change uterine contraction patterns. This may influence uterine blood flow and maternal autonomic nervous system activity, potentially harming the fetus and increasing maternal pain and stress.
|
|
| 3. |
- Clarke, Mike, et al.
(författare)
-
OptiBIRTH: a cluster randomised trial of acomplex intervention to increase vaginalbirth after caesarean section
- 2020
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393 .- 1471-2393.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Despite evidence supporting the safety of vaginal birth after caesarean section (VBAC), rates are lowin many countries.Methods: OptiBIRTH investigated the effects of a woman-centred intervention designed to increase VBAC ratesthrough an unblinded cluster randomised trial in 15 maternity units with VBAC rates < 35% in Germany, Ireland andItaly. Sites were matched in pairs or triplets based on annual birth numbers and VBAC rate, and randomised, 1:1 or 2:1, intervention versus control, following trial registration. The intervention involved evidence-based education ofclinicians and women with one previous caesarean section (CS), appointment of opinion leaders, audit/peer review,and joint discussions by women and clinicians. Control sites provided usual care. Primary outcome was annualhospital-level VBAC rates before the trial (2012) versus final year of the trial (2016). Between April 2014 and October2015, 2002 women were recruited (intervention 1195, control 807), with mode-of-birth data available for 1940women.Results: The OptiBIRTH intervention was feasible and safe across hospital settings in three countries. There was nostatistically significant difference in the change in the proportion of women having a VBAC between interventionsites (25.6% in 2012 to 25.1% in 2016) and control sites (18.3 to 22.3%) (odds ratio adjusted for differences betweenintervention and control groups (2012) and for homogeneity in VBAC rates at sites in the countries: 0.87, 95% CI:0.67, 1.14, p = 0.32 based on 5674 women (2012) and 5284 (2016) with outcome data. Among recruited womenwith birth data, 4/1147 perinatal deaths > 24 weeks gestation occurred in the intervention group (0.34%) and 4/782in the control group (0.51%), and two uterine ruptures (one per group), a rate of 1:1000.Conclusions: Changing clinical practice takes time. As elective repeat CS is the most common reason for CS inmultiparous women, interventions that are feasible and safe and that have been shown to lead to decreasingrepeat CS, should be promoted. Continued research to refine the best way of promoting VBAC is essential. Thismay best be done using an implementation science approach that can modify evidence-based interventions inresponse to changing clinical circumstances.Trial registration: The OptiBIRTH trial was registered on 3/4/2013. Trial registration number ISRCTN10612254.
|
|
| 4. |
- Costa, Raquel, et al.
(författare)
-
Regional differences in the quality of maternal and neonatal care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal : Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - : Wiley. - 0020-7292 .- 1879-3479. ; 159:S1, s. 137-153
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To compare women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth across Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics 2 (NUTS-II) regions in Portugal during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: Women participating in the cross-sectional IMAgiNE EURO study who gave birth in Portugal from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, completed a structured questionnaire with 40 key WHO standards-based quality measures. Four domains of QMNC were assessed: (1) provision of care; (2) experience of care; (3) availability of human and physical resources; and (4) reorganizational changes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Frequencies for each quality measure within each QMNC domain were computed overall and by region. Results: Out of 1845 participants, one-third (33.7%) had a cesarean. Examples of high-quality care included: low frequencies of lack of early breastfeeding and rooming-in (8.0% and 7.7%, respectively) and informal payment (0.7%); adequate staff professionalism (94.6%); adequate room comfort and equipment (95.2%). However, substandard practices with large heterogeneity across regions were also reported. Among women who experienced labor, the percentage of instrumental vaginal births ranged from 22.3% in the Algarve to 33.5% in Center; among these, fundal pressure ranged from 34.8% in Lisbon to 66.7% in Center. Episiotomy was performed in 39.3% of noninstrumental vaginal births with variations between 31.8% in the North to 59.8% in Center. One in four women reported inadequate breastfeeding support (26.1%, ranging from 19.4% in Algarve to 31.5% in Lisbon). One in five reported no exclusive breastfeeding at discharge (22.1%; 19.5% in Lisbon to 28.2% in Algarve). Conclusion: Urgent actions are needed to harmonize QMNC and reduce inequities across regions in Portugal.
|
|
| 5. |
- Drandić, Daniela, et al.
(författare)
-
Women's perspectives on the quality of hospital maternal and newborn care around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic : Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina
- 2022
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - : Wiley. - 0020-7292 .- 1879-3479. ; 159:S1, s. 54-69
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To assess the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) in countries of the former Yugoslavia. Method: Women giving birth in a facility in Slovenia, Croatia, Serbia, and Bosnia-Herzegovina between March 1, 2020 and July 1, 2021 answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Results: A total of 4817 women were included in the analysis. Significant differences were observed across countries. Among those experiencing labor, 47.4%–62.3% of women perceived a reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic, 40.1%–69.7% experienced difficulties in accessing routine antenatal care, 60.3%–98.1% were not allowed a companion of choice, 17.4%–39.2% reported that health workers were not always using personal protective equipment, and 21.2%–53.8% rated the number of health workers as insufficient. Episiotomy was performed in 30.9%–62.8% of spontaneous vaginal births. Additionally, 22.6%–55.9% of women received inadequate breastfeeding support, 21.5%–62.8% reported not being treated with dignity, 11.0%–30.5% suffered abuse, and 0.7%–26.5% made informal payments. Multivariate analyses confirmed significant differences among countries, with Slovenia showing the highest QMNC index, followed by Croatia, Bosnia-Herzegovina, and Serbia. Conclusion: Differences in QMNC among the countries of the former Yugoslavia during the COVID-19 pandemic were significant. Activities to promote high-quality, evidence-based, respectful care for all mothers and newborns are urgently needed. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04847336.
|
|
| 6. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinicians' views of factors of importance for improving the rate of VBAC (vaginal birth after caesarean section) : a study from countries with low VBAC rates.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2393 .- 1471-2393. ; 16:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Caesarean section (CS) rates are increasing worldwide and the most common reason is repeat CS following previous CS. For most women a vaginal birth after a previous CS (VBAC) is a safe option. However, the rate of VBAC differs in an international perspective. Obtaining deeper knowledge of clinicians' views on VBAC can help in understanding the factors of importance for increasing VBAC rates. Focus group interviews with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of "OptiBIRTH", an ongoing research project. The study reported here aims to explore the views of clinicians from countries with low VBAC rates on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates.METHODS: Focus group interviews were held in Ireland, Italy and Germany. In total 71 clinicians participated in nine focus group interviews. Five central questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language and then translated into English. All data were then analysed together and final categories were validated in each country.RESULTS: The findings are presented in four main categories with several sub-categories: 1) "prameters for VBAC", including the importance of the obstetric history, present obstetric factors, a positive attitude among those who are centrally involved, early follow-up after CS and antenatal classes; 2) "organisational support and resources for women undergoing a VBAC", meaning a successful VBAC requires clinical expertise and resources during labour; 3) "fear as a key inhibitor of successful VBAC", including understanding women's fear of childbirth, clinicians' fear of VBAC and the ways that clinicians' fear can be transferred to women; and 4) "shared decision making - rapport, knowledge and confidence", meaning ensuring consistent, realistic and unbiased information and developing trust within the clinician-woman relationship.CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that increasing the VBAC rate depends on organisational factors, the care offered during pregnancy and childbirth, the decision-making process and the strategies employed to reduce fear in all involved.
|
|
| 7. |
- Lundgren, Ingela, 1957, et al.
(författare)
-
How can the VBAC rates be improved – according to midwives and obstetricians in six European countries.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Trienníal Congress 18-22 June 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: The most common reason for caesarean section (CS) is repeat CS following previous CS. Vaginal birth after CS (VBAC) rates vary widely in different healthcare settings and countries. Interview studies with clinicians and women in three countries with high VBAC rates (Finland, Sweden and the Netherlands) and three countries with low VBAC rates (Ireland, Italy and Germany) are part of ‘OptiBIRTH’, a research project funded by EU aiming to increase VBAC rates across Europe through enhanced woman-centred maternity care. Purpose/Objective: To investigate the views of clinicians on factors of importance for improving VBAC rates. Method: Individual interviews and focus group interviews with clinicians in six countries with high and low VBAC rates were conducted during 2012–2013. 115 clinicians participated: 61 midwives and 54 physicians. Five questions about VBAC were used and interviews were analysed using content analysis. The analysis was performed in each country in the native language, translated into English, analysed together, and finally categories were validated in each country. Key Findings: According to midwives and obstetricians from countries with high VBAC rates, the important factors for improving the VBAC rate are a common approach, obstetricians’ final decision on the mode of birth, support during birth, and the strengthening of women’s trust in VBAC. Therefore the structure of the maternity care system in the country, cooperation between midwives and obstetricians, and the care offered during pregnancy and birth should be focused. Findings from the low VBAC countries will be presented at the conference and shows similarities in some aspects but also major differences. Discussion: Similarities and differences between factors of importance for improving the VBAC rate are related to both the care structure, and the views and attitudes of midwives and physicians, which has implications for the care of women post CS.
|
|
| 8. |
- Morano, Sandra, et al.
(författare)
-
Emotions in labour: Italian obstetricians’ experiences of presence during childbirth
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0264-6838 .- 1469-672X. ; 36:1, s. 30-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The present study represents a qualitative research aimed to explore the obstetricians’ psychological experiences of birth. Background: During labour the role of obstetricians assumes a fundamental importance in hospitalised childbirth. However, literature analysis has shown that the psychological side of birth has been investigated only considering the woman’s and midwife’s points of view. The obstetricians’ psychological experiences have not been considered enough and only a few studies at a quantitative level have been performed. Methods: Seven focus groups for a total of 72 obstetricians were conducted in hospital contexts in Italy. The qualitative methodology of grounded theory was adopted. Findings: The results were divided into three different core themes: obstetricians’ approaches to delivery, critical aspects about relationships in the delivery room, and obstetricians’ feelings and emotions in the delivery room. Each theme was subdivided into different subthemes. Conclusion: The results highlight different ways obstetricians approach their profession, the complex and multifaceted relationship with the woman and the extraordinary variety of feelings and emotions, which enrich, but also may complicate, life in the delivery room. Further studies could provide more details to help researchers to develop new and more effective strategies to support obstetricians’ training and work.
|
|
| 9. |
- Nilsson, Christina, 1959, et al.
(författare)
-
Vaginal Birth After Caesarean: Views of women from countries with low VBAC rates
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Women and Birth. - : Elsevier BV. - 1871-5192 .- 1878-1799. ; 30:6, s. 481-490
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Problem and background: Vaginal birth after caesarean section is a safe option for the majority of women. Seeking women´s views can be of help in understanding factors of importance for achieving vaginal birth in countries where the vaginal birth rates after caesarean is low. Aim: To investigate women’s views on important factors to improve the rate of vaginal birth after caesarean in countries where vaginal birth rates after caesarean rates are low. Methods: A qualitative study using content analysis. Data were gathered through focus groups and individual interviews with 51 women, in their native languages, in Germany, Ireland and Italy. The women were asked five questions about vaginal birth after caesarean. Data were translated to English, analysed together and finally validated in each country. Findings: Important factors for the women were that all involved in caring for them were of the same opinion about vaginal birth after caesarean section, thet they experience shared decision-making with clinicians supportive of vaginal birth, receive correct information, are sufficently prepared for a vaginal birth, and experience a culture that supports vaginal birth after caesarean section. Discussion and conclusion: Women’s decision-making about vaginal birth after caesarean in these countries involves a complex, multidimensional interplay of medical, psychological, social, cultural, personal and practical considerations. Further research is needed to explore if the information deficit women report negatively affects their ability to make informed choices, and to understand what matters most to women when making decisions about vaginal birth after caesarean as a mode of birth.
|
|
| 10. |
- Pumpure, Elizabete, et al.
(författare)
-
Womenʼs perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care in childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia : Results from the IMAgiNE EURO study on 40 WHO standards-based quality measures
- 2022
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Gynecology and Obstetrics. - : Wiley. - 0020-7292 .- 1879-3479. ; 159:S1, s. 97-112
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To investigate women's perspectives on the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth during the COVID-19 pandemic in Latvia, comparing the years 2020 and 2021, among women who went into labor or had a prelabor cesarean. Methods: Women giving birth in healthcare facilities in Latvia from March 1, 2020, to October 28, 2021, answered an online questionnaire including 40 WHO standards-based quality measures. Descriptive and multivariate quantile regression analyses were performed to compare QMNC in 2020 and 2021. Results: 2079 women were included in the analysis: 1860 women who went into labor (group 1) and 219 with prelabor cesarean (group 2). Among group 1, 66.4% (n = 99/149) of women received fundal pressure in an instrumental vaginal birth, 43.5% (n = 810) lacked involvement in choices, 17.4% (n = 317) reported suffering abuse, 32.7% (n = 609) reported inadequate breastfeeding support while 5.2% (n = 96) lack of early breastfeeding. A significant reduction in QMNC due to the COVID-19 pandemic was reported by 29.5% (n = 219) and 25.0% (n = 270) of respondents in 2020 and 2021, respectively (P = 0.045). Multivariate analyses highlighted a significantly lower QMNC index for 2020 compared with 2021 (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This first study investigating QMNC in Latvia showed significant gaps in QMNC perceived by respondents, with slightly better results in 2021. Appropriate healthcare strategies to improve health care for women and newborns in Latvia are required. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:NCT04847336.
|
|
| 11. |
- Sinclair, Marlene, et al.
(författare)
-
A systematic literature review of computer-based behavioural change interventions to inform the design of an online VBAC intervention for the OptiBIRTH European randomized trial.
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Evidence Based Midwifery. - 1479-4489. ; 15:1, s. 5-13
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aim: The aim of this research was o systematically review computer-based, behavior change (BC) interventions during pregnancy and their design components in order to determine their best application within the context of the OptiBIRTH intervention. Design: A systematic literature review was undertaken using the Cochrane collaboration guidelines for systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions. Literature searches were conducted in; Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, PsycINFO, from database inception to June 2015. Cochrane Risk of Bias criteria was applied to assess the methodological quality of the papers and a taxonomy of BC techniques was used to appraise the interventions. PICO. Participants included healthy pregnant women who were ≥18 years old. The types of intervention used were computer-based interventions designed to facilitate a BC approach in a sample of pregnant women. The comparison was routine antenatal care. The primary outcome included improved health behavior(s), as an indicator of the intention behind the intervention design. Results. A total of 343 papers were identified through database-searching and hand- searching methods; 80 duplicates were removed. From the remaining 263, 244 did not explicitly address the subject under review. Therefore, 19 full text articles were assessed for eligibility; 16 did not meet eligibility criteria and were excluded at this stage. This resulted in a total of three studies being selected for inclusion in this review (Jackson et al, 2011; Tzilos et al, 2011; Tsoh et al, 2010). The computer-based interventions were designed to bring about BC in relation to alcohol consumption, smoking or diet and exercise during pregnancy. Interventions delivered varied between two types; purely computer-delivered (Tzilos et al. 2011) or a combination of both computer plus face-to-face input (Jackson et al, 2011; Tsoh et al. 2010). Techniques used included motivational interviewing, problem solving cognitive dissonance and goal setting. Types of measurement outcomes varied but were all self-reported behavioral outcomes. Statistically significant improvements in behavioral outcomes were seen in the interventions by Jackson et al (2011) and Tsoh et al (2011), but not in the intervention by Tzilos et al (2011). The GRADE analysis identified that all studies combined lacked blinding and relied on self-reported data increasing risk of bias. Conclusion. This systematic review reports on the best available evidence and theory to design an online component of a complex intervention for use in an RCT to enhance women´s shared decision-making experience about vaginal births after caesarean (VBAC). The review reports the differences between the observed BC approach and that of a decision-making being focused on a more healthy option. As a result, techniques designed to create dissonance are considered appropriate. Shared decision-making, however, is conceptually different, in that the goal is to facilitate a woman in discovering the best direction of travel for her as person. Therefore, the authors argue that it is crucial for healthcare professionals designing complex healthcare interventions (either BC techniques or shared decision-making) to ensure that a person´s self-determination is respected through having access to relevant and understandable information and healthcare professionals who understand a woman´s motivation. However, it is not possible to draw firm conclusions from three studies and there is a requirement for further research.
|
|
| 12. |
- Sinclair, Marlene, et al.
(författare)
-
Assisting women in autonomous decision making about vaginal birth after C section (VBAC): Designing motivational Apps in OptiBIRTH cluster randomised trial (ISRCTN10612254
- 2017
-
Ingår i: 31th ICM Triennial Congress 18-22 June 2017.
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Optibirth is a funded FP7 research programme using a cluster randomised trial in Ireland, Germany and Italy, with 15 clusters of 94 women per cluster. The aim of OptiBIRTH is to evaluate the effectiveness of a complex intervention aimed at increased VBAC rates through enhanced women-centred care1 .The intervention consisted of motivationally enhanced, evidence-based, educational information for women and clinicians for use in face to face and online modes. Purpose/Objective: This paper reports the design process associated with creating three interrelated mobile apps, as part of a complex intervention, to enable women with a previous caesarean section to decide autonomously between a repeat caesarean section and a vaginal birth. The emphasis has been on using technology creatively and effectively maximizing optimality bearing in mind the needs of the new “Z” generation. Method: Focus groups were undertaken across six European countries to illicit women’s need for information about caesarean section and VBAC. Motivational theory underpinned the development of subsequent e-learning materials to enhance woman-led-decision-making. Ethical approval was obtained from Trinity College University, Dublin. Following analysis of focus group data, consultation with experts and exploration of technological solutions, three electronic applications were designed. Following three iterations, the Apps were reviewed for content, motivational design and functionality by Irish, German and Italian midwifery experts and translated into German and Italian. Key Findings: The following interrelated Apps were designed to provide women and health professionals with rapid access to women’s perceptions of their previous birth experience and their current decision-making-in-progress: “My birth story” uses a wordle to communicate past birth experience “My birth thoughts” enables women to communicate their current decision making “My Birth plan” generates a personalised birth plan Discussion: Discussion will focus on challenges facing midwives including, embedding the Apps into a motivationally-designed portal, staff support and training, timeline, cultural differences and translation issues
|
|
| 13. |
- Valente, Emanuelle Pessa, et al.
(författare)
-
WHO Standards-based questionnaire to measure health workers' perspective on the quality of care around the time of childbirth in the WHO European region : development and mixed-methods validation in six countries
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMJ Open. - : BMJ. - 2044-6055. ; 12:4, s. 1-10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: Develop and validate a WHO Standards-based online questionnaire to measure the quality of maternal and newborn care (QMNC) around the time of childbirth from the health workers' perspective.DESIGN: Mixed-methods study.SETTING: Six countries of the WHO European Region.PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: The questionnaire is based on lessons learnt in previous studies, and was developed in three sequential phases: (1) WHO Quality Measures were prioritised and content, construct and face validity were assessed through a Delphi involving a multidisciplinary board of experts from 11 countries of the WHO European Region; (2) translation/back translation of the English version was conducted following The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research guidelines; (3) internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability were assessed among 600 health workers in six countries.RESULTS: The questionnaire included 40 items based on WHO Standards Quality Measures, equally divided into four domains: provision of care, experience of care, availability of human and physical resources, organisational changes due to COVID-19; and its organised in six sections. It was translated/back translated in 12 languages: Bosnian, Croatian, French, German, Italian, Norwegian, Portuguese, Romanian, Russian, Slovenian, Spanish and Swedish. The Cronbach's alpha values were ≥0.70 for each questionnaire section where questions were hypothesised to be interrelated, indicating good internal consistence. Cohen K or Gwet's AC1 values were ≥0.60, suggesting good intrarater reliability, except for one question. Acceptability was good with only 1.70% of health workers requesting minimal changes in question wording.CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the questionnaire has good content, construct, face validity, internal consistency, intrarater reliability and acceptability in six countries of the WHO European Region. Future studies may further explore the questionnaire's use in other countries, and how to translate evidence generated by this tool into policies to improve the QMNC.TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04847336.
|
|
