| 1. |
- Hochstenbach, Kevin, et al.
(författare)
-
Global gene expression analysis in cord blood reveals gender specific differences in response to carcinogenic exposure in utero
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. - 1055-9965 .- 1538-7755. ; 21:10, s. 1756-1767
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: It has been suggested that fetal carcinogenic exposure might lead to predisposition to develop cancer during childhood or in later life possibly through modulation of the fetal transcriptome. Because gender effects in the incidence of childhood cancers have been described, we hypothesized differences at the transcriptomic level in cord blood between male and female newborns as a consequence of fetal carcinogenic exposure. The objective was to investigate whether transcriptomic responses to dietary genotoxic and nongenotoxic carcinogens show gender-specific mechanisms-of-action relevant for chemical carcinogenesis. Methods: Global gene expression was applied in umbilical cord blood samples, the CALUX-assay was used for measuring dioxin(-like), androgen(-like), and estrogen(-like) internal exposure, and acrylamide-hemoglobin adduct levels were determined by mass spectrometry adduct-FIRE-procedure (TM). To link gene expression to an established phenotypic biomarker of cancer risk, micronuclei frequencies were investigated. Results: While exposure levels did not differ between sexes at birth, important gender-specific differences were observed in gene expressions associated with these exposures linked with cell cycle, the immune system and more general cellular processes such as posttranslation. Moreover, oppositely correlating leukemia/lymphoma genes between male and female newborns were identified in relation to the different biomarkers of exposure that might be relevant to male-specific predisposition to develop these cancers in childhood. Conclusions/Impact: This study reveals different transcriptomic responses to environmental carcinogens between the sexes. In particular, male-specific TNF-alpha-NF-kB signaling upon dioxin exposure and activation of the Wnt-pathway in boys upon acrylamide exposure might represent possible mechanistic explanations for gender specificity in the incidence of childhood leukemia.
|
|
| 2. |
- Reier-Nilsen, Tonje, et al.
(författare)
-
Feasibility of desensitizing children highly allergic to peanut by high-dose oral immunotherapy
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Allergy. European Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. - : WILEY. - 0105-4538 .- 1398-9995. ; 74:2, s. 337-348
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: There are limited data on the feasibility, efficacy and safety of high‐dose oral immunotherapy (OIT) in children highly allergic to peanuts.Objective: In children highly allergic to peanut, we primarily aimed to determine the feasibility of reaching the maximum maintenance dose (MMD) of 5000 mg peanut protein or, alternatively, a lower individual maintenance dose (IMD), by OIT up‐dosing. Secondarily, we aimed to identify adverse events (AEs) and determine factors associated with reaching a maintenance dose.Methods: The TAKE‐AWAY peanut OIT trial enrolled 77 children 5‐15 years old, with a positive oral peanut challenge. Fifty‐seven were randomized to OIT with biweekly dose step‐up until reaching MMD or IMD and 20 to observation only. Demographic and biological characteristics, AEs, medication and protocol deviations were explored for associations with reaching maintenance dose.Results: All children had anaphylaxis defined by objective symptoms in minimum two organ systems during baseline challenge. The MMD was reached by 21.1%, while 54.4% reached an IMD of median (minimum, maximum) 2700 (250, 4000) mg peanut protein, whereas 24.5% discontinued OIT. During up‐dosing, 19.4% experienced anaphylaxis. Not reaching the MMD was caused by distaste for peanuts (66.7%), unacceptable AEs (26.7%) and social reasons (6.7%). Increased peanut s‐IgG4/s‐IgE ratio (OR [95% CI]: 1.02 [1.00, 1.04]) was associated with reaching MMD.Conclusion: Although 75.5% of children with peanut anaphylaxis reached a maintenance dose of 0.25‐5 g, only 21.1% reached the MMD. Distaste for peanuts and AEs, including high risk of anaphylaxis, limited the feasibility of reaching MMD.
|
|
