| 1. |
- Derksen, Jeroen W. G., et al.
(författare)
-
European practice patterns and barriers to smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis in the setting of curative versus palliative cancer treatment
- 2020
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Cancer. - : Elsevier. - 0959-8049 .- 1879-0852. ; 138, s. 99-108
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Smoking cessation after a cancer diagnosis is associated with improved overall survival. Few studies have reported oncologists' cessation practice patterns, but differences between the curative and palliative settings have not been described. We aimed to study the oncologist's perceptions on patients' tobacco use, current practices and barriers to providing smoking cessation support, while distinguishing between treatment with curative (C) and palliative (P) intent.Methods: In 2019, an online 34-item survey was sent to approximately 6235 oncologists from 16 European countries. Responses were descriptively reported and compared by treatment setting.Results: Responses from 544 oncologists were included. Oncologists appeared to favour addressing tobacco in the curative setting more than in the palliative setting. Oncologists believe that continued smoking impacts treatment outcomes (C: 94%, P: 74%) and that cessation support should be standard cancer care (C: 95%, P: 63%). Most routinely assess tobacco use (C: 93%, P: 78%) and advise patients to stop using tobacco (C: 88%, P: 54%), but only 24% (P)–39% (C) routinely discuss medication options, and only 18% (P)–31% (C) provide cessation support. Hesitation to remove a pleasurable habit (C: 13%, P: 43%) and disbelieve on smoking affecting outcomes (C: 3%, P: 14%) were disparate barriers between the curative and palliative settings (p < 0.001), but dominant barriers of time, resources, education and patient resistance were similar between settings.Conclusion: Oncologists appear to favour addressing tobacco use more in the curative setting; however, they discuss medication options and/or provide cessation support in a minority of cases. All patients who report current smoking should have access to evidence-based smoking cessation support, also patients treated with palliative intent given their increasing survival.
|
|
| 2. |
- Weadick, Catherine, et al.
(författare)
-
Efficacy and tolerability of metronomic chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer - an international experience in West Sweden and in the South of Ireland.
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Cancer treatment and research communications. - : Elsevier BV. - 2468-2942. ; 25
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is the continuous administration of low dose chemotherapy. It has significant clinical efficacy with minimal toxicity as compared to conventional chemotherapy regimens. Thus represents an attractive treatment modality in selected patients with advanced breast cancer.Patients who received MCT in the form of Capecitabine/Cyclophosphamide for the treatment of advanced breast cancer between May 2014 and October 2018 in Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Sweden and in Cork University Hospital, University Hospital Kerry and the South Infirmary-Victoria University Hospital in Ireland were identified. Medical records were retrospectively reviewed to collect data. All survival analyses were described by Kaplan-Meier curves and analysed with log-rank tests. The primary end-point was time on treatment, used as a surrogate marker for efficacy.148 patients were identified (84 - Sweden, 64 - Ireland), with a median age of 64.2 (range 31-89). The overall mean time on treatment for all patients in both countries is 9.05 months (range 0.36 - 67.21). In patients with bone only disease the mean time on treatment was 10.1 months (range 0.7 - 67.2), compared to patients with visceral disease of 8.91 months (range 0.36 - 39.77). Treatment was ended in the majority of patients because of progression of disease, representing 108 patients (72.9%).This is an observational, retrospective study demonstrating the real world effectiveness of MCT in the treatment of advanced breast cancer. In this cohort of unselected pre-treated patients, the efficacy of MCT was comparable with the survival outcomes of landmark clinical trials.
|
|
