| 1. |
- Astermark, Jan, et al.
(författare)
-
New Inhibitors in the Ageing Population : A Retrospective, Observational, Cohort Study of New Inhibitors in Older People with Hemophilia
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Thrombosis and Haemostasis. - : Georg Thieme Verlag KG. - 0340-6245 .- 2567-689X. ; 122:6, s. 905-912
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction A second peak of inhibitors has been reported in patients with severe hemophilia A (HA) aged >50 years in the United Kingdom. The reason for this suggested breakdown of tolerance in the aging population is unclear, as is the potential impact of regular exposure to the deficient factor by prophylaxis at higher age. No data on hemophilia B (HB) have ever been reported. Aim The ADVANCE Working Group investigated the incidence of late-onset inhibitors and the use of prophylaxis in patients with HA and HB aged ≥40 years. Methods A retrospective, observational, cohort, survey-based study of all patients aged ≥40 years with HA or HB treated at an ADVANCE hemophilia treatment center. Results Information on 3,095 people aged ≥40 years with HA or HB was collected. Of the 2,562 patients with severe HA, the majority (73% across all age groups) received prophylaxis. In patients with severe HA, the inhibitor incidence per 1,000 treatment years was 2.37 (age 40-49), 1.25 (age 50-59), and 1.45 (age 60 +). Overall, the inhibitor incidence was greatest in those with moderate HA (5.77 [age 40-49], 6.59 [age 50-59], and 4.69 [age 60 + ]) and the majority of inhibitor cases were preceded by a potential immune system challenge. No inhibitors in patients with HB were reported. Conclusion Our data do not identify a second peak of inhibitor development in older patients with hemophilia. Prophylaxis may be beneficial in older patients with severe, and possibly moderate HA, to retain a tolerant state at a higher age.
|
|
| 2. |
- Chowdary, Pratima, et al.
(författare)
-
Managing surgery in hemophilia with recombinant factor VIII Fc and factor IX Fc : Data on safety and effectiveness from phase 3 pivotal studies
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Research and Practice in Thrombosis and Haemostasis. - : Wiley. - 2475-0379. ; 6:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background Surgical procedures impose hemostatic risk to people with hemophilia, which may be minimized by optimal factor (F) replacement therapy. Methods This analysis evaluates the efficacy and safety of extended half-life factor replacement recombinant FVIII and FIX Fc fusion proteins (rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc) during surgery in phase 3 pivotal (A-LONG/Kids A-LONG and B-LONG/Kids B-LONG) and extension (ASPIRE and B-YOND) studies. Dosing regimens were determined by investigators. Injection frequency, dosing, blood loss, transfusions, and hemostatic response were assessed. Results Forty-five major (n = 31 subjects) and 90 minor (n = 70 subjects) procedures were performed in hemophilia A; 35 major (n = 22) and 62 minor (n = 37) procedures were performed in hemophilia B. Unilateral knee arthroplasty was the most common major orthopedic procedure (hemophilia A: n = 15/34; hemophilia B: n = 8/24). On the day of surgery, median total dose in adults/adolescents was 81 IU/kg for rFVIIIFc and 144 IU/kg for rFIXFc; most major procedures required <= 2 injections (including loading dose). Through days 1-14, most major procedures had <= 1 injection/day. Hemostasis was rated excellent (rFVIIIFc: n = 39/42; rFIXFc: n = 29/33) or good (n = 3/42; n = 4/33) in evaluable major surgeries, with blood loss comparable with subjects without hemophilia. Most minor procedures in adults/adolescents required one injection on the day of surgery, including median loading dose of 51 IU/kg (rFVIIIFc) and 80 IU/kg (rFIXFc). No major treatment-related safety concerns were identified. No subjects developed inhibitors or serious vascular thromboembolic events. Conclusions rFVIIIFc and rFIXFc were efficacious and well tolerated for the management of perioperative hemostasis across a wide spectrum of major and minor surgeries in hemophilia.
|
|
| 3. |
- Klamroth, Robert, et al.
(författare)
-
Applicability of the European Society of Cardiology Guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes to older people with haemophilia A – A modified Delphi consensus by the ADVANCE Working Group
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Haemophilia. - : Wiley. - 1351-8216 .- 1365-2516. ; 29:1, s. 21-32
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: As people with haemophilia (PWH) receive better treatment and live longer they are more likely to encounter cardiovascular disease (CVD) and other comorbidities. ESC guidelines for the acute management of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are based on the non-haemophilia population. Aim: To review the guidelines and propose relevant adaptations for PWHA without inhibitors who are treated with prophylaxis and present with ACS. Methods: As part of the ADVANCE Group, 20 European haemophilia experts used a modified Delphi approach to develop and gain consensus on proposed adaptations of the ESC guidelines for PWHA without inhibitors. Results: Of the 32 Class I recommendations across both guidelines, adaptions were considered necessary and proposed for 15. The adaptions highlight the need to provide sufficient FVIII trough levels at the time of antithrombotic treatment in people with haemophilia A (HA) without inhibitors. Patients receiving emicizumab prophylaxis and requiring oral anticoagulation therapy or combined single antiplatelet plus oral anticoagulation therapy will require additional FVIII replacement therapy. Conclusion: In the absence of high-quality clinical evidence, the combined expert opinion used to develop these adaptions to the current ESC guidelines may help to guide clinicians in their treatment decisions when a PWHA presents with ACS.
|
|
| 4. |
- Negrier, Claude, et al.
(författare)
-
Surgical evaluation of a recombinant factorVIII prepared using a plasma/albumin-free method: Efficacy and safety of Advate in previously treated patients
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Thrombosis and Haemostasis. - 0340-6245. ; 100:2, s. 217-223
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Evaluation of factor F(V)III replacement in patients with haemophilia A undergoing surgery is critical for FVIII concentrates, yet large scale, multi-center prospective studies, particularly using continuous infusion, are generally lacking for new products. This study evaluated efficacy and safety of a newly developed recombinant FVIII (rAHF-PFM) administered by bolus or continuous infusion in haemophilia A patients undergoing surgery. Subjects >= 5 years of age with baseline FVIII:C <= 2%, and >= 150 prior FVIII exposure days were included in this prospective, international, open-label, uncontrolled clinical trial. rAHF-PFM was administered perioperatively by bolus infusion (BI) or continuous infusion (CI) according to the standard use at the center to prevent bleeding complication. Both the surgeon and haematologist rated efficacy during hospitalization. Fifty-eight subjects underwent 65 surgical procedures (22 major haemorrhagic risk; 35 minor, 8 dental procedures). Bolus infusion was used exclusively in 47 procedures and continuous infusion, with or without supplemental bolus infusions, in 18. Haemostatic efficacy was assessed as excellent or good for 100% of intraoperative ratings (17 CI, 44 BI, 61 total procedures), and 100% of postoperative ratings performed at time of discharge (18 CI, 44 BI, 62 total procedures). Median total consumption of rAHF-PFM during hospitalization was 822 IU/kg/surgery with CI and 910 IU/kg/surgery with BI. Overall rAHF-PFM was well tolerated, and FVIII inhibitors were not detected. In conclusion, rAHF-PFM administered via continuous infusion or bolus injections is safe, non-immunogenic, and effective for perioperative hemostatic management in previously treated haemophilia A patients.
|
|
| 5. |
- Rodeghiero, Francesco, et al.
(författare)
-
Fundamentals for a Systematic Approach to Mild and Moderate Inherited Bleeding Disorders : An EHA Consensus Report
- 2019
-
Ingår i: HemaSphere. - 2572-9241. ; 3:5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Healthy subjects frequently report minor bleedings that are frequently 'background noise' of normality rather than a true disorder. Nevertheless, unexpected or unusual bleeding may be alarming. Thus, the distinction between normal and pathologic bleeding is critical. Understanding the underlying pathologic mechanism in patients with an excessive bleeding is essential for their counseling and treatment. Most of these patients with significant bleeding will result affected by non-severe inherited bleeding disorders (BD), collectively denominated mild or moderate BD for their relatively benign course. Unfortunately, practical recommendations for the management of these disorders are still lacking due to the current state of fragmented knowledge of pathophysiology and lack of a systematic diagnostic approach. To address this gap, an International Working Group (IWG) was established by the European Hematology Association (EHA) to develop consensus-based guidelines on these disorders. The IWG agreed that grouping these disorders by their clinical phenotype under the single category of mild-to-moderate bleeding disorders (MBD) reflects current clinical practice and will facilitate a systematic diagnostic approach. Based on standardized and harmonized definitions a conceptual unified framework is proposed to distinguish normal subjects from affected patients. The IWG proposes a provisional comprehensive patient-centered initial diagnostic approach that will result in classification of MBD into distinct clinical-pathological entities under the overarching principle of clinical utility for the individual patient. While we will present here a general overview of the global management of patients with MBD, this conceptual framework will be adopted and validated in the evidence-based, disease-specific guidelines under development by the IWG.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
