| 1. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2012
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 2. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 3. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 4. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 5. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 6. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 7. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 8. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 9. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 10. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 11. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 12. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 13. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 14. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 15. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 16. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 17. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 18. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 19. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 20. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 21. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 22. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 23. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 24. |
|
|
| 25. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 26. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(author)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (peer-reviewed)
|
|
| 27. |
|
|
| 28. |
|
|
| 29. |
- Kanai, M, et al.
(author)
-
- 2023
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 30. |
|
|
| 31. |
|
|
| 32. |
|
|
| 33. |
- Bell, D., et al.
(author)
-
Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the sinonasal region
- 2016
-
In: Head and Neck-Journal for the Sciences and Specialties of the Head and Neck. - : Wiley. - 1043-3074. ; 38:S1
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the sinonasal region, which are relatively uncommon but clinically very important, are reviewed here in the light of current knowledge. Using a definition for neuroendocrine based on phenotypic, histologic, immunohistochemical, and electron microscopic features rather than histogenetic criteria, sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinomas are examined with a particular emphasis on the small-cell and large-cell subtypes. This is followed by revisiting olfactory neuroblastoma because it is also a tumor that shows a neuroendocrine phenotype. Kadish clinical and Hyams histologic grading systems as prognosticators of olfactory neuroblastoma are also considered in detail. Finally, controversies regarding sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma as a neuroendocrine tumor are discussed and a possible relationship with high-grade olfactory neuroblastoma is explored. Genetic events and current management of these tumors are also outlined.
|
|
| 34. |
|
|
| 35. |
|
|
| 36. |
- DeAngelis, Nicola, et al.
(author)
-
2020 WSES guidelines for the detection and management of bile duct injury during cholecystectomy
- 2021
-
In: World Journal of Emergency Surgery. - : BMC. - 1749-7922. ; 16:1
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Bile duct injury (BDI) is a dangerous complication of cholecystectomy, with significant postoperative sequelae for the patient in terms of morbidity, mortality, and long-term quality of life. BDIs have an estimated incidence of 0.4-1.5%, but considering the number of cholecystectomies performed worldwide, mostly by laparoscopy, surgeons must be prepared to manage this surgical challenge. Most BDIs are recognized either during the procedure or in the immediate postoperative period. However, some BDIs may be discovered later during the postoperative period, and this may translate to delayed or inappropriate treatments. Providing a specific diagnosis and a precise description of the BDI will expedite the decision-making process and increase the chance of treatment success. Subsequently, the choice and timing of the appropriate reconstructive strategy have a critical role in long-term prognosis. Currently, a wide spectrum of multidisciplinary interventions with different degrees of invasiveness is indicated for BDI management. These World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines have been produced following an exhaustive review of the current literature and an international expert panel discussion with the aim of providing evidence-based recommendations to facilitate and standardize the detection and management of BDIs during cholecystectomy. In particular, the 2020 WSES guidelines cover the following key aspects: (1) strategies to minimize the risk of BDI during cholecystectomy; (2) BDI rates in general surgery units and review of surgical practice; (3) how to classify, stage, and report BDI once detected; (4) how to manage an intraoperatively detected BDI; (5) indications for antibiotic treatment; (6) indications for clinical, biochemical, and imaging investigations for suspected BDI; and (7) how to manage a postoperatively detected BDI.
|
|
| 37. |
- Giot, L., et al.
(author)
-
Isotopic production cross sections of the residual nuclei in spallation reactions induced by 136Xe projectiles on proton at 500 A MeV
- 2013
-
In: Nuclear Physics A. - : Elsevier BV. - 0375-9474. ; 899, s. 116-132
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Around 270 medium-mass residual nuclei, formed in spallation reactions induced by 136Xe projectiles impinging on a liquid hydrogen target at 500 A MeV, have been unambiguously identified at GSI using the magnetic spectrometer FRS. The individual production cross sections and the longitudinal momentum distributions have been determined with high accuracy. These data represent an important constraint for theoretical models describing spallation reactions. © 2013 Elsevier B.V.
|
|
| 38. |
- Paradela, C., et al.
(author)
-
Isotopic production cross sections of residual nuclei in the spallation reaction Xe-136 (200A MeV) + p
- 2017
-
In: Physical Review C. - 2469-9985 .- 2469-9993. ; 95:4
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The residual nuclei produced in the spallation reaction of Xe-136 nuclei at 200A MeV on protons have been studied by measuring the isotopic distributions for the elements from cadmium (Z = 48) to cesium (Z = 55) by using the fragment separator (FRS) spectrometer at GSI and the inverse kinematics technique. This is one of the few measurements performed at such a low projectile energy, close to the validity limit for intranuclear cascade models such as INCL or ISABEL. The experimental results have been compared to these intranuclear cascade codes coupled to the evaporation code ABLA. Both code combinations reproduce qualitatively the measured isotopic distributions; however, both underestimate the production of residues with mass numbers between 126 and 134. The measured cross sections are of interest for the planning of future radioactive beam or neutron source facilities.
|
|
| 39. |
|
|
| 40. |
|
|
