| 1. |
- Perez-Grijalba, V, et al.
(författare)
-
Plasma Aβ42/40 ratio alone or combined with FDG-PET can accurately predict amyloid-PET positivity: a cross-sectional analysis from the AB255 Study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Alzheimer's research & therapy. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1758-9193. ; 11:1, s. 96-
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundTo facilitate population screening and clinical trials of disease-modifying therapies for Alzheimer’s disease, supportive biomarker information is necessary. This study was aimed to investigate the association of plasma amyloid-beta (Aβ) levels with the presence of pathological accumulation of Aβ in the brain measured by amyloid-PET. Both plasma Aβ42/40 ratio alone or combined with an FDG-PET-based biomarker of neurodegeneration were assessed as potential AD biomarkers.MethodsWe included 39 cognitively normal subjects and 20 patients with mild cognitive impairment from the AB255 Study who had undergone PiB-PET scans. Total Aβ40 and Aβ42 levels in plasma (TP42/40) were quantified using ABtest kits. Subjects were dichotomized as Aβ-PET positive or negative, and the ability of TP42/40 to detect Aβ-PET positivity was assessed by logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic analyses. Combination of plasma Aβ biomarkers and FDG-PET was further assessed as an improvement for brain amyloidosis detection and diagnosis classification.ResultsEighteen (30.5%) subjects were Aβ-PET positive. TP42/40 ratio alone identified Aβ-PET status with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.779–0.982). Discriminating performance of TP42/40 to detect Aβ-PET-positive subjects yielded sensitivity and specificity values at Youden’s cutoff of 77.8% and 87.5%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 0.732 and negative predictive value of 0.900. All these parameters improved after adjusting the model for significant covariates. Applying TP42/40 as the first screening tool in a sequential diagnostic work-up would reduce the number of Aβ-PET scans by 64%. Combination of both FDG-PET scores and plasma Aβ biomarkers was found to be the most accurate Aβ-PET predictor, with an AUC of 0.965 (95% CI = 0.913–0.100).ConclusionsPlasma TP42/40 ratio showed a relevant and significant potential as a screening tool to identify brain Aβ positivity in preclinical and prodromal stages of Alzheimer’s disease.
|
|
| 2. |
- Perez-Grijalba, V, et al.
(författare)
-
Plasma Aβ42/40 Ratio Detects Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease and Correlates with CSF and Neuroimaging Biomarkers in the AB255 Study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease. - : SERDI. - 2426-0266 .- 2274-5807. ; 6:1, s. 34-41
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Easily accessible biomarkers are needed for the early identification of individuals at risk of developing Alzheimer’s disease (AD) in large population screening strategies. Objectives: This study evaluated the potential of plasma β-amyloid (Aβ) biomarkers in identifying early stages of AD and predicting cognitive decline over the following two years. Design: Total plasma Aβ42/40 ratio (TP42/40) was determined in 83 cognitively normal individuals (CN) and 145 subjects with amnestic mild cognitive impairment (a-MCI) stratified by an FDG-PET AD-risk pattern. Results: Significant lower TP42/40 ratio was found in a-MCI patients compared to CN. Moreover, a-MCIs with a high-risk FDG-PET pattern for AD showed even lower plasma ratio levels. Low TP42/40 at baseline increased the risk of progression to dementia by 70%. Furthermore, TP42/40 was inversely associated with neocortical amyloid deposition (measured with PiB-PET) and was concordant with the AD biomarker profile in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Conclusions: TP42/40 demonstrated value in the identification of individuals suffering a-MCI, in the prediction of progression to dementia, and in the detection of underlying AD pathology revealed by FDG-PET, Amyloid-PET and CSF biomarkers, being, thus, consistently associated with all the well-established indicators of AD.
|
|
| 3. |
- Janelidze, Shorena, et al.
(författare)
-
Detecting amyloid positivity in early Alzheimer's disease using combinations of plasma A beta 42/A beta 40 and p-tau
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Alzheimers & Dementia. - : Wiley. - 1552-5260 .- 1552-5279. ; 18:2, s. 283-293
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: We studied usefulness of combining blood amyloid beta A(beta)42/A beta 40, phosphorylated tau (p-tau)217, and neurofilament light (NfL) to detect abnormal brain A beta deposition in different stages of early Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: Plasma biomarkers were measured using mass spectrometry (A beta 42/A beta 40) and immunoassays (p-tau217 and NfL) in cognitively unimpaired individuals (CU, N = 591) and patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI, N = 304) from two independent cohorts (BioFINDER-1, BioFINDER-2). Results: In CU, a combination of plasma A beta 42/A beta 40 and p-tau217 detected abnormal brain A beta status with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.83 to 0.86. In MCI, the models including p-tau217 alone or A beta 42/A beta 40 and p-tau217 had similar AUCs (0.86-0.88); however, the latter showed improved model fit. The models were implemented in an online application providing individualized risk assessments (https://brainapps.shinyappas.io/PredictAAbplasma/). Discussion:A combination of plasma A beta 42/A beta 40 and p-tau217 discriminated A beta status with relatively high accuracy, whereas p-tau217 showed strongest associations with A beta pathology in MCI but not in CU.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Pannee, Josef, 1979, et al.
(författare)
-
The global Alzheimer's Association round robin study on plasma amyloid beta methods
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Alzheimer's & Dementia. - : Wiley. - 1552-5260 .- 1552-5279. ; 13:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction Blood-based assays to measure brain amyloid beta (A beta) deposition are an attractive alternative to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based assays currently used in clinical settings. In this study, we examined different blood-based assays to measure A beta and how they compare among centers and assays. Methods Aliquots from 81 plasma samples were distributed to 10 participating centers. Seven immunological assays and four mass-spectrometric methods were used to measure plasma A beta concentrations. Results Correlations were weak for A beta 42 while A beta 40 correlations were stronger. The ratio A beta 42/A beta 40 did not improve the correlations and showed weak correlations. Discussion The poor correlations for A beta 42 in plasma might have several potential explanations, such as the high levels of plasma proteins (compared to CSF), sensitivity to pre-analytical sample handling and specificity, and cross-reactivity of different antibodies. Different methods might also measure different pools of plasma A beta 42. We, however, hypothesize that greater correlations might be seen in future studies because many of the methods have been refined during completion of this study.
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
