| 1. |
- Jazrawi, Allan, et al.
(författare)
-
A Comparison of Skin Staining after Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Women Undergoing Breast Cancer Surgery Using Blue Dye and Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide Nanoparticle (SPIO) Tracers
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI AG. - 2072-6694. ; 14:23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Simple Summary Both superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and blue dye (BD) have been reported to cause skin staining after breast-conserving surgery. SPIO is a novel tracer that has been shown to identify sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) in patients with breast cancer. Our study was the first to compare the incidence and size of skin staining between the two tracers. We reported on these outcomes in a preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial in which women received both SPIO and BD. This study investigated whether there was a difference in the incidence and size of skin staining between SPIO and BD after SLN-dissection. In all, 270 women were operated on with breast-conserving surgery and received SPIO, and 204 of these women also received BD. After 24 months of follow up, there was no statistically significant difference between the two tracers with regard to the size and incidence of skin staining. Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) are a tracer for sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection. In a preplanned secondary analysis of a prospective clinical trial (SentiDose) we reported on skin staining after SPIO and blue dye (BD) injections. For SPIO, either a 1.5 mL retroareolar injection on the day of surgery or a 1.0 mL peritumoral/retroareolar injection 1-7 days before surgery was given. A 1.0 mL sub-/intradermal periareolar injection of BD was also administered to all these women. Staining was then assessed at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. A total of 270 women received SPIO and were operated on with breast-conserving surgery. Of these, 204 women also received BD. A total of 58 (21.5%) women had an SPIO stain 6 months postoperatively with a median size of 6.8 cm(2) (p = 0.56), while 51 (25.0%) had a BD stain with a median size of 8.5 cm(2) (p = 0.93). The incidence and size of SPIO and BD staining decreased over time reciprocally. At 24 months, the incidence and median size of SPIO was 23 (8.6%) and 4 cm(2), respectively. For BD, the incidence was 14 (6.3%, p = 0.13), and the median size was 3.5 cm(2) (p = 0.18). There was, therefore, no statistically significant difference in the incidence or size of skin staining between SPIO and BD over time.
|
|
| 2. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Axillary evaluation in ductal cancer in situ of the breast: challenging the diagnostic accuracy of clinical practice guidelines
- 2021
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0007-1323 .- 1365-2168. ; 108:9, s. 1120-1125
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Staging of the axilla is not routine in ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) although invasive cancer is observed in 20-25 per cent of patients at final pathology. Upfront sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is advocated in clinical practice guidelines in certain situations. These include expected challenges in subsequent SLN detection and when the risk for invasion is high. Clinical practice guidelines are, however, inconsistent and lead to considerable practice variability. Methods: Clinical practice guidelines for upfront SLND in DCIS were identified and applied to patients included in the prospective SentiNot study. These patients were evaluated by six independent, blinded raters. Agreement statistics were performed to assess agreement and concordance. Receiver operating characteristic curves were constructed, to assess guideline accuracy in identifying patients with underlying invasion. Results: Eight guidelines with relevant recommendations were identified. Interobserver agreement varied greatly (kappa: 0.23-0.9) and the interpretation as to whether SLND should be performed ranged from 40-90 per cent and with varying concordance (32-88 per cent). The diagnostic accuracy was low with area under the curve ranging from 0.45 to 0.55. Fifty to 90 per cent of patients with pure DCIS would undergo unnecessary SLNB, whereas 10-50 per cent of patients with invasion were not identified as 'high risk'. Agreement across guidelines was low (kappa=0.24), meaning that different patients had a similar risk of being treated inaccurately. Conclusion: Available guidelines are inaccurate in identifying patients with DCIS who would benefit from upfront SLNB. Guideline refinement with detailed preoperative work-up and novel techniques for SLND identification could address this challenge and avoid overtreatment.
|
|
| 3. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Axillary Staging in the Setting of a Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Cancer In Situ (DCIS) : Results of an International Expert Panel and a Critical Guideline Performance Using Frequentist and Bayesian Analysis
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 27:Suppl. 2, s. S337-S338
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background/Objective: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is not routine in DCIS. Guidelines suggest SLNB when there is high risk for underlying invasion (large size, high grade, symptomatic lesion) or for detection failure (e.g., after mastectomy). However, guidelines and current practice patterns are inconsistent. Moreover, whilst SLNB is thought to be feasible and accurate after wide local excision (WLE), there is less consensus to support its use after oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OPBCS), which can reduce the need for mastectomy (Mx) and is gradually adopted as standard of care. The study aim was to assess if guidelines or individualized assessment result in optimal selection of patients for upfront SLNB.Methods: A panel of 28 international experts (20 surgeons, 8 oncologists, Europe 20, USA 5, Asia/Australia 3) was formed, all blind to the identity of the others. They reviewed anonymized patient cases from the SentiNot study (n=184, m. age 60 years, DCIS m. size 4 cm, Grade 2/3= 36%/64%, mass lesions 13,4%, underlying invasion 24.5%) and answer if they would consider upfront SLNB and why. Consensus and majority were set to >75 and >50%. At the same time, 6 independent raters (4 surgeons, 2 oncologists) reviewed guidelines and assessed the same patient cases per each guideline. Accuracy in relation to underlying invasion was assessed by Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves and Area Under the Curve (AUC) was reported. Agreement was investigated by kappa statistics and decision-making patterns by logistic multivariate regression and cluster analysis. To allow for flexibility and adaptation to current knowledge, both a frequentist and a Bayesian approach were undertaken. Priors were adjusted after a literature review regarding the factors that are commonly thought to be associated with higher risk for underlying invasion.Results: A total of 44,896 decisions were retrieved and analysed. The panel reached consensus/majority for upfront SLNB in 41.3/61.4%, whereas individual rates ranged from 11 to 100%. Agreement among panelists was low (kappa=0.37). In multivariate regression analysis for the entire panel, type of surgery was the most common determinant, (simple WLE=less, OPBCS=more and Mx=constant for SLNB), followed by symptomatic diagnosis and DCIS size. Most (26) members had a clear decision-making pattern regarding SLND, based mainly on DCIS size and type of surgery. Individual decision-making performed modestly in identifying patients with underlying invasion (AUC range 0,47-0,59), resulting mainly in overtreatment in 44-77% of patients. The panel performed similarly by majority (AUC 0,5) and by consensus (AUC 0,55) but “undertreated” 60-75% of patients with invasion, failing to identify them as "high-risk." After the recognition of different decision-making patterns, panelists were divided in subgroups with similar decision-making pattern. Analysis identified subgroups with difference in SLNB rate but not with better AUC. The disagreement among panelists in the same subgroups was significant, not only regarding which patients should undergo SLNB, but also on what factors that recommendation was based on. Eight guidelines with relevant recommendations were identified [USA (ASCO/NCCN), Europe (ESMO), Sweden, Denmark, UK, Netherlands and Italy, retrieval date May 2019]. Agreement among raters for each guideline separately varied (kappa: 0.23-0.9). Interpretation as to whether SLNB should be performed ranged widely (40-90%) and with varying concordance (32-88%). No guideline demonstrated accuracy (AUC range 0.45-0.55). Overtreatment risk was high (50-90%), whereas 10-50% of patients with invasion were not identified as “high- risk.” Agreement across guidelines was low (kappa=0.24), meaning that different patients had similar risk to be treated inaccurately, regardless of which guideline was examined.Conclusions: Individualized decision-making and guideline interpretation may be highly subjective and with low accuracy in terms of prediction of invasive disease, resulting in almost random risk for over- or undertreatment of the axilla in patients with DCIS. This suggests that current views and guidelines should be challenged. More accurate preoperative workup and novel techniques to allow for delayed SLNB may be of value in this setting.
|
|
| 4. |
- Karakatsanis, A., et al.
(författare)
-
Delayed Sentinel Lymph Node Dissection in Patients with a Preoperative Diagnosis of Ductal Cancer In Situ by Preoperative Injection with Superparamagnetic Iron Oxide (SPIO) Nanoparticles: The SentiNot Study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgical Oncology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1068-9265 .- 1534-4681. ; 30:7, s. 4064-4072
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundDifficulty in preoperatively assessing the risk for occult invasion or surgery that precludes future accurate axillary mapping in patients with ductal cancer in situ (DCIS) account for overutilization of SLND.MethodsProspective, multicenter, cohort study, including women with any DCIS planned for mastectomy or DCIS grade 2 and > 20 mm, any DCIS grade 3, any mass-forming DCIS and any planned surgery. Patients received an interstitial SPIO injection during breast surgery, but no upfront SLND was performed. If invasion was identified on final pathology, delayed SLND (d-SLND) was performed separately with the coadministration of isotope +/- blue dye (BD). Study outcomes were proportion of upfront SLNDs that were avoided, detection rates during d-SLND, and impact on healthcare costs.ResultsIn total, 78.7% of study participants (N = 254, mean age 60 years, mean DCIS size 37.8 mm) avoided upfront SLND. On d-SLND (median 28 days, range 9-46), SPIO outperformed Tc-99 with (98.2% vs. 63.6%, p < 0.001) or without BD (92.7% vs. 50.9%, p < 0.001) and had higher nodal detection rate (86.9% vs. 32.3%, p < 0.001) and with BD (93.9% vs. 41.4%, p < 0.001). Only 27.9% of all SLNs retrieved were concordant for Tc-99 and SPIO. Type of breast procedure (WLE vs. oncoplastic BCT vs. mastectomy) affected these outcomes and accounted for the low performance of Tc-99 (p < 0.001). d-SLND resulted in a 28.1% total cost containment for women with pure DCIS on final pathology (4190 vs. 5828 USD, p < 0.001).ConclusionsMarking the SLN with SPIO may avoid overtreatment and allow for accurate d-SLND in patients with DCIS.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Karakatsanis, Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
The Nordic SentiMag trial : a comparison of super paramagnetic iron oxide (SPIO) nanoparticles versus Tc(99) and patent blue in the detection of sentinel node (SN) in patients with breast cancer and a meta-analysis of earlier studies.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. - New York : Springer-Verlag New York. - 0167-6806 .- 1573-7217. ; 157:2, s. 281-294
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of SPIO as a tracer in sentinel node biopsy (SNB) in breast cancer with Tc and patent blue in a multicentre prospective study and perform a meta-analysis of all published studies. It also aims to follow skin discoloration after SPIO injection and describe when and how it resolves. Totally 206 patients with early breast cancer were recruited. Tc and patent blue were administered in standard fashion. Patients were injected with SPIO (Sienna+) preoperatively. SNB was performed and detection rates were recorded for both methods. Skin discoloration was followed and documented postoperatively. Data extraction and subsequent meta-analysis of all previous studies were also performed. SN detection rates were similar between standard technique succeeded and SPIO both per patient (97.1 vs. 97.6 %, p = 0.76) as well as per node (91.3 vs. 93.3 %, p = 0.34), something which was not affected by the presence of malignancy. Concordance rates were also consistently high (98.0 % per patient and 95.9 % per node). Discoloring was present in 35.5 % of patients postoperatively, almost exclusively in breast conservation. It fades slowly and is still detectable in 8.6 % of patients after 15 months. Meta-analysis depicted similar detection rates (p = 0.71) and concordance rates (p = 0.82) per patient. However, it seems that SPIO is characterized by higher nodal retrieval (p < 0.001). SPIO is an effective method for the detection of SN in patients with breast cancer. It is comparable to the standard technique and seems to simplify logistics. Potential skin discoloration is something of consideration in patients planned for breast conservation.
|
|
| 7. |
- Pistioli, Lida, et al.
(författare)
-
The Effect of Melatonin Intake on Survival of Patients with Breast Cancer-A Population-Based Registry Study.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Cancers. - : MDPI AG. - 2072-6694. ; 14:23
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Previous research has demonstrated the antitumoral effects of melatonin on breast cancer in both in vitro and in vivo studies. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether melatonin has a favorable effect on the survival of patients diagnosed with early breast cancer. This retrospective registry-based study included all patients diagnosed with breast cancer in Sweden between 2005 and 2015. Data were linked to the Swedish Prescribed Drug Registry and the Swedish Cause of Death Registry. A multivariate Cox regression model, including patient age, tumor size, tumor grade, ER status, HER2 status, nodal status and defined daily doses (DDDs) of melatonin, was used to analyze breast-cancer-specific survival as well as overall survival. Of the 37,075 included patients, 926 (2.5%) were prescribed melatonin, with a median DDD of 30. Melatonin was found to have a protective effect on breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in the univariate analysis (HR: 0.736, 95% CI: 0.548-0.989, p = 0.042), but when adjusting for known prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis, this beneficial effect disappeared (HR: 1.037, 95% CI: 0.648-1.659, p = 0.879). Melatonin was not proven to have a favorable effect on the survival of patients diagnosed with early breast cancer in this retrospective registry study.
|
|
| 8. |
- Pistioli, Lida, et al.
(författare)
-
The Intricate Relationship between Melatonin and Breast Cancer: A Short Review
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Chirurgia. - 1221-9118. ; 116:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Melatonin is a relatively recently isolated hormone, produced by the pineal gland. Its implication in several cell functions has augmented interest from scientists worldwide. There is ongoing research investigating the deterrent relationship between melatonin and malignancies and in particular breast cancer. 'The aim of this article is to review some of the most important findings concerning the effect of melatonin on cancer biology, from both preclinical and clinical studies providing an insight to the complex biological actions of this molecule, as well as their potential significance. The last part concentrates on the oncostatic activities of melatonin on breast cancer and special attention is given on the interplay between melatonin and estrogen. Epidemiological, experimental and clinical evidence indicates that this area is worth further investigation.
|
|
