| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Lo Martire, Riccardo, 1984-, et al.
(författare)
-
Psychometric properties of the Swedish version of the TreatmentOutcome Satisfaction Questionnaire
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European spine journal. - : Springer Publishing Company. - 0940-6719 .- 1432-0932. ; 26:2, s. 316-323
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: Patient satisfaction is an outcome measure for low-back pain (LBP) interventions which allows clinicians to design patient-oriented treatments. The Treatment Outcome Satisfaction Questionnaire (TOSQ) is an English instrument constructed for such evaluations, and no equivalent instruments exist for the Swedish population. This study, therefore, translated TOSQ into Swedish and assessed the translated version's psychometric properties for patients with LBP.METHODS: A cross-cultural adaptation was used to translate TOSQ into Swedish. Subsequently, data from 131 patients with LBP whom undergone physiotherapy were consecutively aggregated and analyzed in a Rasch rating scale model with person measures standardized at 0-100 logits to evaluate the translated scale's validity. Finally, test-retest reliability of the Swedish version of TOSQ (TOSQ-S) was quantified via an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and the standard error of measurement (SEM) in 41 patients.RESULTS: TOSQ was successfully translated into Swedish; however, while some Rasch model indices supported the translated scale's unidimensionality, one out of eight items and 12 out of 131 subjects misfitted the model. Scale optimization resulted in a 6-item subconfiguration, for which all items fitted the model, person misfits were reduced to ten subjects, and the person separation index increased from 1.86 to 2.04. ICC and SEM estimates suggested acceptable reliability for the six-item TOSQ-S at 0.66 and 6.6 logits, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: A six-item TOSQ-S configuration showed acceptable psychometric properties and is suitable for measuring treatment outcome satisfaction of physiotherapy in patients with LBP.
|
|
| 3. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Are job strain and sleep disturbances prognostic factors for low-back pain? : A cohort study of a general population of working age in Sweden
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine. - : Medical Journals Sweden AB. - 1650-1977 .- 1651-2081. ; 49:7, s. 591-597
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether job strain, i.e. a combination of job demands and decision latitude (job control), and sleep disturbances among persons with occasional low-back pain are prognostic factors for developing troublesome low-back pain; and to determine whether sleep disturbances modify the potential association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Methods: A population-based cohort from the Stockholm Public Health Cohort surveys in 2006 and 2010 (n = 25,167) included individuals with occasional low-back pain at baseline 2006 (n = 6,413). Through logistic regression analyses, potential prognostic effects of job strain and sleep disturbances were studied. Stratified analyses were performed to assess modification of sleep disturbances on the potential association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Results: Those exposed to job strain; active job (odds ratio (OR) 1.3, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.1-1.6), or high strain (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.9-2.4) and those exposed to severe sleep disturbances (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.3-4.0), but not those exposed to passive jobs (OR 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4) had higher odds of developing troublesome low-back pain. Sleep disturbances did not modify the association between job strain and troublesome low-back pain. Conclusion: These findings indicate that active job, high job strain and sleep disturbances are prognostic factors for troublesome low-back pain. The odds of developing troublesome low-back pain due to job strain were not modified by sleep disturbance.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Bernhoff, Gabriella, et al.
(författare)
-
A comparison of health-related factors between patients diagnosed with ME/CFS and patients with a related symptom picture but no ME/CFS diagnosis: a cross-sectional exploratory study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Translational Medicine. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1479-5876. ; 20
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS), the capacity for activity and participation is strongly limited. The disease definition is very broad, and considering the lack of evidence for best treatment, it is important to understand what is ME/CFS-specific in the biopsychosocial perspective in comparison with similar syndromes. The objective was to study the difference between those diagnosed with ME/CFS and those with similar symptoms but no ME/CFS diagnosis for self-perceived level of physical activity, work ability, anxiety/depression, and health-related quality of life. Methods: This was a clinical cross-sectional study with data collected from mailed questionnaires. The following variables were compared between patients diagnosed with ME/CFS (n = 205) and those with similar symptoms but no diagnosis (n = 57); level of physical activity, Work ability index (WAI), Hospital anxiety and depression scale (HAD-A/HAD-D), and RAND-36 Physical functioning, Role limitations due to physical health problems, Role limitations due to personal or emotional problems, Social functioning, Energy/fatigue, Bodily pain, Emotional well-being, and General health perceptions. The Chi-squared test (nominal data), the Mann-Whitney U test, the Student’s t test and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Results: The group diagnosed with ME/CFS had a more impaired physical and mental exertion ability as compared to the group that had similar symptoms but was not diagnosed with ME/CFS, shown by a RAND-36 lower index of physical role functioning, social functioning, energy, worse pain and poorer overall health (p ≤ 0.05). In contrast, no significant group differences emerged for weekly level of physical activity, work ability, anxiety/depression, and RAND-36 Emotional role limitation and well-being. Conclusion: Our results indicate that those with a diagnosis of ME/CFS are characterized by an impaired ability for physical or mental exertion, worse pain, and poorer overall health as compared to individuals with similar symptoms but for whom ME/CFS-diagnosis was not established. The results may be cautiously interpreted as support when focusing on patients’ self-care in terms of management of energy levels. The results must however be verified in future studies.
|
|
| 6. |
- Costa, Nathalia, et al.
(författare)
-
A Definition of "Flare" in Low Back Pain: A Multiphase Process Involving Perspectives of Individuals With Low Back Pain and Expert Consensus
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Journal of Pain. - : CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE. - 1526-5900 .- 1528-8447. ; 20:11, s. 1267-1275
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Low back pain (LBP) varies over time. Consumers, clinicians, and researchers use various terms to describe LBP fluctuations, such as episodes, recurrences and flares. Although "flare" is use commonly, there is no consensus on how it is defined. This study aimed to obtain consensus for a LBP flare definition using a mixed-method approach. Step 1 involved the derivation of a preliminary candidate flare definition based on thematic analysis of views of 130 consumers in consultation with an expert consumer writer. In step 2, a workshop was conducted to incorporate perspectives of 19 LBP experts into the preliminary flare definition, which resulted in 2 alternative LBP flare definitions. Step 3 refined the definition using a 2-round Delphi consensus with 50 experts in musculoskeletal conditions. The definition favored by experts was further tested with 16 individuals with LBP in step 4, using the definition in three scenarios. This multiphase study produced a definition of LBP flare that distinguishes it from other LBP fluctuations, represents consumers views, involves expert consensus, and is understandable by consumers in clinical and research contexts: "A flare-up is a worsening of your condition that lasts from hours to weeks that is difficult to tolerate and generally impacts your usual activities and/or emotions." Perspective: A multiphase process, incorporating consumers views and expert consensus, produced a definition of LBP flare that distinguishes it from other LBP fluctuations. (C) 2019 by the American Pain Society
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Fors, Maria, 1987-
(författare)
-
Best Practice Physiotherapy for Patients with Low Back Pain in Primary Care : Clinical Outcomes and Explanatory Factors
- 2023
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Clinical practice guidelines provide general recommendations informing best practice physiotherapy for low back pain (LBP). Despite increased research on LBP, the recommendations have barely changed over the last few decades and the burden of LBP remains. New research strategies have been suggested to further understand the complexity of factors influencing recovery of LBP. Several mechanisms are expected to underpin the benefits of physiotherapy care. How different factors influence and explain treatment outcome in patients in different phases of primary care pathway needs to be better understood for the development of better targeted LBP interventions.The overall aim of this thesis was to investigate if and how best practice physiotherapy primary care for patients with LBP can improve clinical outcome.Methods: The four papers in the thesis are based on two randomised controlled trials (RCT) evaluating best practice physiotherapy for patients with LBP in different phases of the primary care pathway reflecting the variation of patients’ needs. Two papers investigated pre-surgery physiotherapy compared to being on a waiting-list in patients with degenerative lumbar spine disorders who are surgical candidates (n = 197). Effects on walking ability and quadriceps femoris strength were evaluated. Associations between the pre-surgery physical factors with 1-year post-surgery physical activity (PA) level were analysed using multiple linear regression. The dose-response relationship was investigated comparing the effects of attending ≤11 treatment sessions with ≥12 treatment sessions. Multiple mediation analyses and conditional process analyses were used to explore physical and psychosocial factors as mediators and patients’ treatment expectations as a moderator of the treatment’s effects on disability, back pain intensity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL), and self-rated health.Two papers were based on a stepped cluster RCT, where a physiotherapy primary healthcare model for LBP (the BetterBack MoC) was regionally implemented. Patients seeking care for LBP were allocated to either the BetterBack MoC (after implementation) or to routine care (before implementation) (n = 467). In a prospective cohort study within the RCT, the associations between patients’ initial illness perceptions and outcomes in disability, back pain intensity, HRQoL, and self-care enablement (i.e., perceived ability to understand and cope with LBP) after 3 and 12 months were explored using stepwise linear regression. Single mediation analyses were used to test whether a priori hypothesised patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement at 3 months mediated effects in disability and pain at 6 months of care according to the BetterBack MoC compared to routine care. Exploratory mediation analyses were also used to compare guideline-adherent care with non-adherent care. Guideline-adherent care was defined as care that included education and exercise interventions and did not include non-evidence-based interventions, referral to specialist care, or imaging.Results: Small positive effects from pre-surgery physiotherapy were seen in walking ability and quadriceps femoris strength. No clear dose-response relationship could be demonstrated when comparing the effects of ≤11 treatment sessions with ≥12. Pre-surgery physical outcome measures together explained 27.5% of the variation in PA level 1-year post-surgery, mainly explained by the pre-surgery PA level. The effect of the pre-surgery physiotherapy on patients’ PA level partly explained the treatment’s effect on self-rated health. Furthermore, among biopsychosocial factors, self-efficacy related to activities of daily living (ADL) partly explained the effect on all outcomes. PA related fear avoidance beliefs partly explained the effects on pain and self-rated health. Patients’ treatment expectations moderated the effect in all outcomes. High expectations had a positive moderating effect, while expectation of full recovery had a suppressive effect. In patients seeking physiotherapy for LBP, negative initial prognosis and treatment expectations were associated with worse scores in several outcomes at 3- and 12-month follow-ups. Patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement did not explain the effects of care after implementing the BetterBack MoC. This was mainly due to the BetterBack MoC not having superior effects over routine care on the hypothesised mediators. Illness perceptions and self-care enablement at 3 months were associated with disability and pain at 6 months. Further, these factors partly explained the effects of guideline-adherent care in disability and pain.Conclusions: Patients’ illness perceptions, self-care enablement, ADL self-efficacy, and PA related fear-avoidance beliefs were supported to be potential factors explaining the effect on clinical outcomes of best practice physiotherapy for LBP in primary care. Patients’ initial expectations regarding the prognosis and treatment may influence prospective outcomes including patients’ self-care enablement. More specifically, pain and disability outcomes of best practice physiotherapy for patients seeking care for LBP may improve by targeting patients’ illness perceptions and self-care enablement. Patients who are surgical candidates can increase their physical capacity and walking related performance through best practice physiotherapy. In this pre-surgery phase, the treatment should include targeting patients’ ADL self-efficacy, PA related fear-avoidance beliefs, and PA level for improved disability, pain, and HRQoL.
|
|
| 9. |
- Granström, Hannah, et al.
(författare)
-
Movement control tests for the lumbopelvic complex. Are these tests reliable and valid?
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. - : Informa UK Limited. - 0959-3985 .- 1532-5040. ; 33:5, s. 386-397
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This study evaluated inter- and intra-observer reliability and discriminative validity of three movement control tests: 1) standing knee-lift test; 2) static lunge test; and 3) dynamic lunge test. Thirty-eight subjects, 21 with low-back pain and 17 healthy, were video-recorded while performing the tests. Four physical therapists scored the tests according to a standardized protocol and calculated a composite score for each test based on the number of incorrect test components. Inter-observer reliability for the composite scores ranged between 0.68 and 0.80 (ICC 2,k) and intra-observer reliability between 0.54 and0.82 (ICC 2,1). The separate test components ranged between 0.32 and 0.91 (κfree) for inter-observer reliability and 0.42 and1.00 for intra-observer reliability. Test components showing the highest values were: back extension; arm lowering; and shoulders moving backwards. Components hip hitch, trunk lateral flexion, knee not lifted straight up and hips moving backwards did not reach accepted thresholds. Discriminative validity ranged between 0.47 and 0.56 (AUC). As our results showed an overall good agreement for the composite, scores and for the majority of the included test components the tests can be considered reliable enough. As the tests' discriminative ability was close to "none", they should, however, not be used for diagnostic purposes but should be further evaluated toward predicted validity.
|
|
| 10. |
- Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Reliability and validity of a novel Kinect-based software program for measuring posture, balance and side-bending
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2474. ; 19:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Clinical examinations are subjective and often show a low validity and reliability. Objective and highly reliable quantitative assessments are available in laboratory settings using 3D motion analysis, but these systems are too expensive to use for simple clinical examinations. Qinematic™ is an interactive movement analyses system based on the Kinect camera and is an easy-to-use clinical measurement system for assessing posture, balance and side-bending. The aim of the study was to test the test-retest the reliability and construct validity of Qinematic™ in a healthy population, and to calculate the minimal clinical differences for the variables of interest. A further aim was to identify the discriminative validity of Qinematic™ in people with low-back pain (LBP).METHODS: We performed a test-retest reliability study (n = 37) with around 1 week between the occasions, a construct validity study (n = 30) in which Qinematic™ was tested against a 3D motion capture system, and a discriminative validity study, in which a group of people with LBP (n = 20) was compared to healthy controls (n = 17). We tested a large range of psychometric properties of 18 variables in three sections: posture (head and pelvic position, weight distribution), balance (sway area and velocity in single- and double-leg stance), and side-bending.RESULTS: The majority of the variables in the posture and balance sections, showed poor/fair reliability (ICC < 0.4) and poor/fair validity (Spearman <0.4), with significant differences between occasions, between Qinematic™ and the 3D-motion capture system. In the clinical study, Qinematic™ did not differ between people with LPB and healthy for these variables. For one variable, side-bending to the left, there was excellent reliability (ICC =0.898), excellent validity (r = 0.943), and Qinematic™ could differentiate between LPB and healthy individuals (p = 0.012).CONCLUSION: This paper shows that a novel software program (Qinematic™) based on the Kinect camera for measuring balance, posture and side-bending has poor psychometric properties, indicating that the variables on balance and posture should not be used for monitoring individual changes over time or in research. Future research on the dynamic tasks of Qinematic™ is warranted.
|
|
| 11. |
- Grooten, Wilhelmus Johannes Andreas, et al.
(författare)
-
Summarizing the effects of different exercise types in chronic low back pain : a systematic review of systematic reviews
- 2022
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1471-2474. ; 23:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: In chronic LBP (CLBP), guideline-endorsed treatment is to stay active, return to normal activity, and to exercise. Several reviews on various exercise types used in CLBP have been published. We aimed to identify systematic reviews of common exercise types used in CLBP, to appraise their quality, and to summarize and compare their effect on pain and disability.METHODS: We searched the databases OVID MEDLINE, EMBASE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, and WEB OF SCIENCE (Core collection) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on adults between 18 and 70 years of age suffering from chronic or recurrent LBP for a period of at least 12 weeks, which investigated the effects of exercises on pain and disability. All searches were conducted without language restriction. The search was performed up until 2022-01-26. The included reviews were grouped into nine exercise types: aerobic training, aquatic exercises, motor control exercises (MCE), resistance training, Pilates, sling exercises, traditional Chinese exercises (TCE), walking, and yoga. The study quality was assessed with AMSTAR-2. For each exercise type, a narrative analysis was performed, and the level of evidence for the effects of exercise was assessed through GRADE.RESULTS: Our database search resulted in 3,475 systematic reviews. Out of the 253 full texts that were screened, we included 45 systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The quality of the included reviews ranged from high to critically low. Due to large heterogeneity, no meta-analyses were performed. We found low-to-moderate evidence of mainly short-term and small beneficial effects on pain and disability for MCE, Pilates, resistance training, TCE, and yoga compared to no or minimal intervention.CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that the effect of various exercise types used in CLBP on pain and disability varies with no major difference between exercise types. Many of the included systematic reviews were of low-to-moderate quality and based on randomized controlled trials with high risk of bias. The conflicting results seen, undermine the certainty of the results leading to very-low-to-moderate quality of evidence for our results. Future systematic reviews should be of higher quality to minimize waste of resources.TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO: Reg no 190409 Registration date 01AUG 2020.
|
|
| 12. |
- Jonsson, Anders, et al.
(författare)
-
Intra- and inter-rater reliability of movement and palpation tests in patients with neck pain : A systematic review
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. - : TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC. - 0959-3985 .- 1532-5040. ; 34:3, s. 165-180
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neck pain is common and often becomes chronic. Various clinical tests of the cervical spine are used to direct and evaluate treatment. This systematic review aimed to identify studies examining the intra- and/or interrater reliability of tests used in clinical examination of patients with neck pain. A database search up to April 2016 was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, and AMED. The Quality Appraisal of Reliability Studies Checklist (QAREL) was used to assess risk of bias. Eleven studies were included, comprising tests of active and passive movement and pain evaluating participants with ongoing neck pain. One study was assessed with a low risk of bias, three with medium risk, while the rest were assessed with high risk of bias. The results showed differing reliabilities for the included tests ranging from poor to almost perfect. In conclusion, active movement and pain for pain or mobility overall presented acceptable to very good reliability (Kappa >0.40); while passive intervertebral tests had lower Kappa values, suggesting poor reliability. It may be a coincidence that the studies indicating very good reliability tended to be of higher quality (low to moderate risk of bias), while studies finding poor reliability tended to be of lower quality (high risk of bias). Regardless, the current recommendation from this review would suggest the clinical use of tests with acceptable reliability and avoiding the use of tests that have been shown to not be reliable. Finally, it is critical that all future reliability studies are of higher quality with low risk of bias.
|
|
| 13. |
- Krantz, Rasmus, et al.
(författare)
-
The Swedish version of the Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire : A clinimetric study of validity and reliability
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Physiotherapy Theory and Practice. - : Taylor & Francis. - 0959-3985 .- 1532-5040. ; 39:1, s. 154-162
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: The Lumbar Spine Instability Questionnaire (LSIQ) is a patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) suggested to measure clinical instability of the spine.Objective: The aim was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the LSIQ into Swedish and to test its measurement properties.Methods: We included people with low back pain (LBP) seeking primary care (n = 101). The LSIQ was translated using international recommendations. Construct validity was investigated via the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RM) and the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS). Reliability was tested via test-retest (Intra Class Correlation, ICC2.1) (n = 50) and by analyzing internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha). A suggested cutoff score was used to study discriminative ability.Results: The LSIQ was successfully translated into Swedish. For construct validity, a moderate correlation was shown with the RM (rho 0.58) and the NPRS (rho 0.47). Test-retest demonstrated high reliability for the total score (ICC2.1 0.94, 95% CI 0.86–0.96). Internal consistency reached a Cronbach Alpha of 0.64. Participants scoring higher on the LSIQ (≥9) showed significantly higher pain and lower disability levels, were of higher age and less physically active.Conclusion: The Swedish LSIQ shows acceptable measurement properties regarding test-retest reliability and validity. To further study the usefulness of the LSIQ and the suggested cutoff score, the dimensionality needs to be investigated.
|
|
| 14. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, E, et al.
(författare)
-
Are respiratory disorders risk factors for troublesome low-back pain? A study of a general population cohort in Sweden
- 2019
-
Ingår i: European spine journal. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0940-6719 .- 1432-0932. ; 28:11, s. 2502-2509
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: A multi-morbidity perspective of troublesome low back pain (LBP) has been highlighted for example in relation to respiratory disorders. Our purpose was to investigate whether respiratory disorders are risk factors for reporting troublesome LBP in people with no or occasional LBP at baseline.METHODS: This prospective cohort study was based on the Stockholm Public Health Cohort 2006/2010. We included adults reporting no or occasional LBP the last 6 months at baseline (n = 17,177). Exposures were self-reported asthma and/or Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). Outcome was troublesome LBP defined as reporting LBP a couple of days per week or more often that restricted work capacity or hindered daily activities to some or to a high degree, the last 6 months. Binomial regression models were used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Adjusted results indicate that those suffering from asthma had a risk of troublesome LBP at follow-up (RR 1.29, 95% CI 0.92-1.81) as do those suffering from COPD (RR 2.0, 95% CI 1.13-3.56). If suffering from asthma and concurrent COPD the RR was 3.55 (95% CI 1.58-7.98).CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that suffering from asthma and/or COPD increases the risk of developing troublesome LBP, which highlights the importance to consider the overall health of people at risk of troublesome LBP and to take the multi-morbidity perspective into consideration. Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.
|
|
| 15. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, E, et al.
(författare)
-
Are respiratory disorders risk factors for troublesome neck/shoulder pain? : A study of a general population cohort in Sweden
- 2023
-
Ingår i: European spine journal. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0940-6719 .- 1432-0932. ; 32:2, s. 659-666
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE: The etiology of neck/shoulder pain is complex. Our purpose was to investigate if respiratory disorders are risk factors for troublesome neck/shoulder pain in people with no or occasional neck/shoulder pain.METHODS: This prospective cohort study was based on the Stockholm Public Health Cohorts (SPHC) 2006/2010 and the SPHC 2010/2014. We included adults who at baseline reported no or occasional neck/shoulder pain in the last six months, from the two subsamples (SPHC 06/10 n = 15 155: and SPHC 2010/14 n = 25 273). Exposures were self-reported asthma at baseline in SPHC 06/10 and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) at baseline in SPHC 10/14. The outcome was having experienced at least one period of troublesome neck/shoulder pain which restricted work capacity or hindered daily activities to some or to a high degree during the past six months, asked for four years later. Binomial regression analyses were used to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).RESULTS: Adjusted results indicate that those reporting to suffer from asthma at baseline had a higher risk of troublesome neck/shoulder pain at follow-up four years later (RR 1.48, 95% CI 1.10-2.01) as did those reporting to suffer from COPD (RR 2.12 95%CI 1.54-2.93).CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that those with no or occasional neck/shoulder pain and reporting to suffer from asthma or COPD increase the risk for troublesome neck/shoulder pain over time. This highlights the importance of taking a multi-morbidity perspective into consideration in health care. Future longitudinal studies are needed to confirm our findings.
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
- Rasmussen Barr, Eva
(författare)
-
Recurrent low-back pain : exercise intervention and predictive factors
- 2009
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Low-back pain continues to be one of the main problems for which subjects seek treatment in primary care. While the natural history of low-back pain is often considered to be good, many sufferers get further episodes that affect well-being as well as quality of life. Aim: The main aim of the work presented in this thesis was to evaluate the efficacy of a graded exercise intervention in a sample of subjects with recurrent low-back pain still at work, and to investigate factors predicting future outcome of disability and pain. Methods: One-hundred-and-eighteen subjects with recurrent low-back pain participated. In addition, Study I included 57 healthy age- and gender-matched controls. Pre-intervention, post-intervention, 6-month, 12-month (Studies II, III, IV) and 36-month (Study III) follow-ups evaluated pain, disability, physical health, fear-avoidance beliefs and self-efficacy beliefs. Self-rated questionnaires were used. Level of aerobic fitness was compared between the group with low-back pain and healthy controls (Study I), and a graded exercise intervention emphasizing stabilizing exercises was evaluated in comparison with either manual treatment (Study II) or daily walks (Study III). Predictive factors for a future outcome of disability and pain were investigated using multivariate regression analysis (Study IV). Results: There was no difference in aerobic fitness level between subjects with low-back pain and healthy controls. In the group with LBP, regression analysis showed an association between a lower level of aerobic fitness and higher age, gender and lower levels of selfefficacy (Study I). In Study II, comparing a graded exercise intervention with manual treatment, a significant difference in favour of the exercise group regarding disability after the treatment was maintained in the long term. No significant difference emerged between the groups regarding pain. (Study II). In Study III, between-group testing showed significant differences in favour of the exercise group for perceived disability at 12-months, maintained at the 36-month follow-up. In addition, between-group results for pain showed greater reduction for the exercise group post-intervention than for the daily-walks group. Regarding secondary outcome, the results showed a significant group difference in favour of the exercise group in short- and long term regarding physical health and in self rated selfefficacy at 12- and 36-month follow-ups. Regarding fear-avoidance, no such differences emerged (Study III). Lower levels of self-efficacy, higher levels of perceived disability painlevel and pain frequency emerged as predictors of an unfavourable clinical outcome, and these predictors remained significant in the post-intervention models. (Study IV). Conclusion: In conclusion, a graded exercise intervention emphasizing stabilizing exercises alleviated disability levels and improved physical health and rated self-efficacy more than manual treatment or daily walks did, in subjects with recurrent low-back pain and currently at work. The graded exercises also reduced recurrent need for treatment in the long term, indicating that the exercises had a preventive effect. Levels of aerobic fitness were comparable between the subjects with low-back pain and the healthy controls. However, lower levels of aerobic fitness were associated with higher age, gender and low self-efficacy in the sample of subjects with low-back pain. Importantly, higher levels of perceived pain, pain frequency and disability and a lower level of self-efficacy emerged as predictors of an unfavourable outcome of disability and pain in the long term, indicating that such early screening information might be useful for further management of patients with LBP.
|
|
| 18. |
- Rasmussen Barr, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Rehabilitering vid ryggbesvär
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Motorisk kontroll och inlärning. - : Studentlitteratur AB. - 9789144103600 ; , s. 207-218
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 19. |
- Rasmussen-Barr, Eva, et al.
(författare)
-
Summarizing the effects of different exercise types in chronic neck pain - a systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews
- 2023
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - 1471-2474. ; 24:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: To date, no consensus exists as to whether one exercise type is more effective than another in chronic neck pain. This systematic review and meta-analysis of systematic reviews aimed to summarize the literature on the effect of various exercise types used in chronic neck pain and to assess the certainty of the evidence.METHODS: We searched the databases Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, SportDiscus, and Web of Science (Core Collection) for systematic reviews and meta-analyses on adults between 18 and 70 years with chronic neck pain lasting ≥ 12 weeks which investigated the effects of exercises on pain and disability. The included reviews were grouped into motor control exercise (MCE), Pilates exercises, resistance training, traditional Chinese exercise (TCE), and yoga. Study quality was assessed with AMSTAR-2 and the level of certainty for the effects of the exercise through GRADE. A narrative analysis of the results was performed and in addition, meta-analyses when feasible.RESULTS: Our database search resulted in 1,794 systematic reviews. We included 25 systematic reviews and meta-analyses including 17,321 participants (overlap not accounted for). The quality of the included reviews ranged from critically low to low (n = 13) to moderate to high (n = 12). We found low to high certainty of evidence that MCE, Pilates exercises, resistance training, TCE, and yoga have short-term positive effects on pain and that all exercise types except resistance training, show positive effects on disability compared to non-exercise controls. We found low to moderate certainty of evidence for conflicting results on pain and disability when the exercise types were compared to other exercise interventions in the short-term as well as in intermediate/long-term apart for yoga, as no long-term results were available.CONCLUSION: Overall, our findings show low to high certainty of evidence for positive effects on pain and disability of the various exercise types used in chronic neck pain compared to non-exercise interventions, at least in the short-term. Based on our results, no optimal exercise intervention for patients with chronic neck pain can be recommended, since no large differences between the exercise types were shown here. Because the quality of the included systematic reviews varied greatly, future systematic reviews need to increase their methodological quality.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Prospero CRD42022336014.
|
|
| 20. |
- Röijezon, Ulrik, et al.
(författare)
-
Ländryggen
- 2019. - 1
-
Ingår i: Motorisk kontroll och inlärning. - : Studentlitteratur AB. - 9789144074177 ; , s. 215-228
-
Bokkapitel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 21. |
- Schlager, Angela, et al.
(författare)
-
Inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurement of range of motion in joints included in three hypermobility assessment methods
- 2018
-
Ingår i: BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. - : BMC. - 1471-2474. ; 19
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Comparisons across studies of generalized joint hypermobility are often difficult since there are several classification methods and methodological differences in the performance exist. The Beighton score is most commonly used and has been tested for inter- and intra-rater reliability. The Contompasis score and the Hospital del Mar criteria have not yet been evaluated for reliability. The aim of this study was to investigate the inter- and intra-rater reliability for measurements of range of motion in joints included in these three hypermobility assessment methods using a structured protocol.Methods: The study was planned in accordance with guidelines for reporting reliability studies. Healthy adults were consecutively recruited (49 for inter-and 29 for intra-rater assessments). Intra-class correlations, two-way random effects model, (ICC 2.1) with 95% confidence intervals, standard error of measurement, percentage of agreement, Cohen's Kappa () and prevalence-adjusted bias-adjusted kappa were calculated for single-joint measured in degrees and for total scores.Results: The inter- and intra-rater reliability in total scores were ICC 2.1: 0.72-0.82 and 0.76-0.86 and for single-joint measurements in degrees 0.44-0.91 and 0.44-0.90, respectively. The difference between ratings was within 5 degrees in all but one joint. Standard error of measurement ranged from 1.0 to 6.9 degrees. The inter- and intra-rater reliability for prevalence of positive hypermobility findings the Cohen's for total scores were 0.54-0.78 and 0.27-0.78 and in single joints 0.21-1.00 and 0.19-1.00, respectively. The prevalence- and bias adjusted Cohen's , increased all but two values.Conclusions: Following a structured protocol, the inter- and intra-rater reliability was good-to-excellent for total scores and in all but two single joints, measured in degrees. The inter- and intra-rater reliability for prevalence of positive hypermobility findings was fair-to-almost perfect for total scores and slight-to-almost-perfect in single joints.By using a structured protocol, we attempted to standardize the assessment of range of motion in clinical and in research settings. This standardization could be helpful in the first part of the process of standardizing the tests thus avoiding that assessment of GJH is based on chance.
|
|
| 22. |
- Schröder, Karin, 1966-
(författare)
-
Implementing BetterBack – a Best Practice Physiotherapy Healthcare Model for Low Back Pain : Clinician and Patient Evaluation
- 2021
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Background: Low back pain (LBP) occurs in all ages, and first-line treatment by physiotherapists (PTs) is common. However, national evidence-based LBP clinical guidelines are still lacking in Sweden. To facilitate guideline uptake, we developed and with a multifaceted strategy implemented a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model (BetterBack☺ MoC) with the aim of supporting management of LBP in primary care. The overall aim of this thesis was to evaluate a multifaceted implementation strategy and a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model for LBP.Methods: This thesis is based on one methodological study and three experimental trials with PTs and patients with LBP. In Paper I a mixed method design was used to translate, tailor, validate and feasibility-test the Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire (DIBQ). This tailored DIBQ Questionnaire (DIBQ-t) was used to evaluate potential barriers/facilitators during the implementation process together with evaluation of PTs’ confidence, attitudes and beliefs in managing LBP. In a stepped cluster randomised controlled trial, PTs and their patients in three clusters were allocated to intervention group (after implementation of BetterBack☺ MoC) or control group (routine physiotherapy care). The proportions of guideline-adherent care were compared between groups (Paper III). This evaluation was based on PTs’ adherence to eight clinical practice recommendations and three clinical practice quality indices (CPQI). The overall CPQI containing the five most prioritised recommendations are: no referral to specialist care; no referral to medical imaging for benign LBP; use of educational interventions; use of exercise interventions; and no use of non-evidence-based physiotherapy. Finally, in Paper IV patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were compared between intervention (after the implementation of BetterBack☺ MoC) and routine care. In Paper IV an additional secondary analysis was performed, comparing PROMs based on whether or not PTs had delivered care that met all five criteria of the overall CPQI or not.Results: A tailored, feasible and valid questionnaire was developed, DIBQ-t to be used for evaluation of the implementation of LBP primary care programmes. After implementation workshop, PTs’ (n = 116) confidence increased, and PTs’ attitudes and beliefs shifted towards a more biopsychosocial orientation. PTs had high expectations of the BetterBack☺ MoC, which decreased after using the MoC. When evaluating received treatment for 500 patients with LBP, a more frequent delivery of guideline-adherent care was seen after implementation (n = 278) compared to routine care (n = 222). The overall CPQI containing the five prioritised recommendations was fulfilled in 59% of all patients in intervention versus 26% in routine care group. Analysis of adherence to specific recommendations showed a significantly improved use of stratification of number of PT visits and patient educational interventions, frequent use of exercise was maintained, and use of non-evidence-based treatment and medical imaging decreased after implementation. The primary outcome, i.e. referral to specialist consultation, was low in both groups, with no between-group differences. After implementation of the BetterBack☺ MoC, no between-group differences in PROMs were seen except for greater satisfaction with LBP care, greater improvement in illness perception and better health-related quality of life, compared with routine care. However, when PTs’ care adhered to all five CPQI criteria, a greater improvement of most patient-reported outcomes was seen compared to patient care that did not adhere to all five CPQI criteria. Conclusions: The implementation of a best practice physiotherapy healthcare model (BetterBack☺ MoC) for LBP improved both clinician and patient outcomes. PTs increased use of guideline-adherent care, confidence and biopsychosocial orientation in managing LBP. Patients reported improved satisfaction, illness perception and health-related quality of life. The implementation did not decrease referral to specialist consultation from an initial low level; nor did it improve patients’ disability and pain more than routine care. However, when guideline-adherent care was fulfilled, most PROMs improved. It is therefore important to highlight the importance of guideline-based primary care for improving patient-reported LBP outcomes.
|
|
| 23. |
- Wahlstedt, Charlotta, et al.
(författare)
-
Anterior cruciate ligament injury and ankle dorsiflexion
- 2015
-
Ingår i: Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0942-2056 .- 1433-7347. ; 23:11, s. 3202-3207
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim was to study whether the degree of ankle dorsiflexion differs between subjects with an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and uninjured controls. Another aim was to study ankle dorsiflexion between the injured and the uninjured leg and in addition between women and men with an ACL injury. Sixty subjects (ACL injury, n = 30 and controls, n = 30) were enroled consecutively at two physical therapy settings. Ankle dorsiflexion was measured with a goniometer in a standardized way in a weight-bearing lunge position. Repeated-measures ANOVA revealed a significant difference (p < 0.001) in ankle dorsiflexion between subjects with an ACL injury (mean 41.1A degrees SD 5.7) and those without (mean 46.6A degrees SD 5.3). No difference in ankle dorsiflexion was found between the injured leg and the uninjured or between women and men with ACL injury. The present findings suggest lower degree of ankle dorsiflexion in subjects with an ACL injury than in uninjured controls. A functional test measuring ankle dorsiflexion with a goniometer may be one way of identifying individuals at increased risk of ACL injury. Comparative study, Level II.
|
|
| 24. |
- Widerström, Birgitta, et al.
(författare)
-
“How does physical examination findings influence physiotherapists’ decision-making when matching treatment to patients with low back pain?”
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Musculoskeletal Science and Practice. - : Elsevier. - 2468-8630 .- 2468-7812. ; 53
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Further clinical data how low-back pain (LBP) symptoms and signs manifests in physiotherapy clinical reasoning and treatment decision-making is needed. Objective: The aim was to explore and describe how symptoms and signs portrayed in three case descriptions of LBP influences physiotherapy treatment decision-making. Design: This was an exploratory interview study using inductive content analysis. Method: Fifteen semi-structured individual interviews were used to collect data of physiotherapists’ treatment decision-making regrading three diverse LBP case descriptions. The participants were men, women, experienced and novice, working in primary healthcare settings in one sparsely populated region and in one larger city in Sweden. Findings: Two overarching themes were identified influencing decision-making for the treatment of LBP:1) Explicit assessment features distinguish treatment approaches; with categories describing how symptoms and signs were used to target treatment (nature of pain induce reflections on plausible cause; narrative details trigger attention and establishes knowledge-enhancing foci; pain-movement-relationship is essential; diverse emphasis of pain modulation and targeted treatment approaches): and 2) Preconceived notion of treatment, with categories describing personal treatment rationales, unrelated to the presented symptoms and signs (passive treatment avoidance and motor control exercise ambiguity). Conclusion: This study identifies how assessment details lead to decisions on diverse treatment approaches for LBP, but also that treatment decisions can be based on preconceived beliefs unrelated to the clinical presentation. The results underpin the mix of knowledge sources that clinicians need to balance and the necessity of self-awareness of preconceptions for informed and meaningful clinical decision-making.
|
|
