| 1. |
- Lozano, Rafael, et al.
(författare)
-
Measuring progress from 1990 to 2017 and projecting attainment to 2030 of the health-related Sustainable Development Goals for 195 countries and territories: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
- 2018
-
Ingår i: The Lancet. - : Elsevier. - 1474-547X .- 0140-6736. ; 392:10159, s. 2091-2138
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Efforts to establish the 2015 baseline and monitor early implementation of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) highlight both great potential for and threats to improving health by 2030. To fully deliver on the SDG aim of “leaving no one behind”, it is increasingly important to examine the health-related SDGs beyond national-level estimates. As part of the Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study 2017 (GBD 2017), we measured progress on 41 of 52 health-related SDG indicators and estimated the health-related SDG index for 195 countries and territories for the period 1990–2017, projected indicators to 2030, and analysed global attainment. Methods: We measured progress on 41 health-related SDG indicators from 1990 to 2017, an increase of four indicators since GBD 2016 (new indicators were health worker density, sexual violence by non-intimate partners, population census status, and prevalence of physical and sexual violence [reported separately]). We also improved the measurement of several previously reported indicators. We constructed national-level estimates and, for a subset of health-related SDGs, examined indicator-level differences by sex and Socio-demographic Index (SDI) quintile. We also did subnational assessments of performance for selected countries. To construct the health-related SDG index, we transformed the value for each indicator on a scale of 0–100, with 0 as the 2·5th percentile and 100 as the 97·5th percentile of 1000 draws calculated from 1990 to 2030, and took the geometric mean of the scaled indicators by target. To generate projections through 2030, we used a forecasting framework that drew estimates from the broader GBD study and used weighted averages of indicator-specific and country-specific annualised rates of change from 1990 to 2017 to inform future estimates. We assessed attainment of indicators with defined targets in two ways: first, using mean values projected for 2030, and then using the probability of attainment in 2030 calculated from 1000 draws. We also did a global attainment analysis of the feasibility of attaining SDG targets on the basis of past trends. Using 2015 global averages of indicators with defined SDG targets, we calculated the global annualised rates of change required from 2015 to 2030 to meet these targets, and then identified in what percentiles the required global annualised rates of change fell in the distribution of country-level rates of change from 1990 to 2015. We took the mean of these global percentile values across indicators and applied the past rate of change at this mean global percentile to all health-related SDG indicators, irrespective of target definition, to estimate the equivalent 2030 global average value and percentage change from 2015 to 2030 for each indicator. Findings: The global median health-related SDG index in 2017 was 59·4 (IQR 35·4–67·3), ranging from a low of 11·6 (95% uncertainty interval 9·6–14·0) to a high of 84·9 (83·1–86·7). SDG index values in countries assessed at the subnational level varied substantially, particularly in China and India, although scores in Japan and the UK were more homogeneous. Indicators also varied by SDI quintile and sex, with males having worse outcomes than females for non-communicable disease (NCD) mortality, alcohol use, and smoking, among others. Most countries were projected to have a higher health-related SDG index in 2030 than in 2017, while country-level probabilities of attainment by 2030 varied widely by indicator. Under-5 mortality, neonatal mortality, maternal mortality ratio, and malaria indicators had the most countries with at least 95% probability of target attainment. Other indicators, including NCD mortality and suicide mortality, had no countries projected to meet corresponding SDG targets on the basis of projected mean values for 2030 but showed some probability of attainment by 2030. For some indicators, including child malnutrition, several infectious diseases, and most violence measures, the annualised rates of change required to meet SDG targets far exceeded the pace of progress achieved by any country in the recent past. We found that applying the mean global annualised rate of change to indicators without defined targets would equate to about 19% and 22% reductions in global smoking and alcohol consumption, respectively; a 47% decline in adolescent birth rates; and a more than 85% increase in health worker density per 1000 population by 2030. Interpretation: The GBD study offers a unique, robust platform for monitoring the health-related SDGs across demographic and geographic dimensions. Our findings underscore the importance of increased collection and analysis of disaggregated data and highlight where more deliberate design or targeting of interventions could accelerate progress in attaining the SDGs. Current projections show that many health-related SDG indicators, NCDs, NCD-related risks, and violence-related indicators will require a concerted shift away from what might have driven past gains—curative interventions in the case of NCDs—towards multisectoral, prevention-oriented policy action and investments to achieve SDG aims. Notably, several targets, if they are to be met by 2030, demand a pace of progress that no country has achieved in the recent past. The future is fundamentally uncertain, and no model can fully predict what breakthroughs or events might alter the course of the SDGs. What is clear is that our actions—or inaction—today will ultimately dictate how close the world, collectively, can get to leaving no one behind by 2030.
|
|
| 2. |
- Stanaway, Jeffrey D., et al.
(författare)
-
Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990-2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017
- 2018
-
Ingår i: The Lancet. - 1474-547X .- 0140-6736. ; 392:10159, s. 1923-1994
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries, and Risk Factors Study (GBD) 2017 comparative risk assessment (CRA) is a comprehensive approach to risk factor quantification that offers a useful tool for synthesising evidence on risks and risk-outcome associations. With each annual GBD study, we update the GBD CRA to incorporate improved methods, new risks and risk-outcome pairs, and new data on risk exposure levels and risk- outcome associations. Methods We used the CRA framework developed for previous iterations of GBD to estimate levels and trends in exposure, attributable deaths, and attributable disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs), by age group, sex, year, and location for 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or groups of risks from 1990 to 2017. This study included 476 risk-outcome pairs that met the GBD study criteria for convincing or probable evidence of causation. We extracted relative risk and exposure estimates from 46 749 randomised controlled trials, cohort studies, household surveys, census data, satellite data, and other sources. We used statistical models to pool data, adjust for bias, and incorporate covariates. Using the counterfactual scenario of theoretical minimum risk exposure level (TMREL), we estimated the portion of deaths and DALYs that could be attributed to a given risk. We explored the relationship between development and risk exposure by modelling the relationship between the Socio-demographic Index (SDI) and risk-weighted exposure prevalence and estimated expected levels of exposure and risk-attributable burden by SDI. Finally, we explored temporal changes in risk-attributable DALYs by decomposing those changes into six main component drivers of change as follows: (1) population growth; (2) changes in population age structures; (3) changes in exposure to environmental and occupational risks; (4) changes in exposure to behavioural risks; (5) changes in exposure to metabolic risks; and (6) changes due to all other factors, approximated as the risk-deleted death and DALY rates, where the risk-deleted rate is the rate that would be observed had we reduced the exposure levels to the TMREL for all risk factors included in GBD 2017.
|
|
| 3. |
- Abolfathi, Bela, et al.
(författare)
-
The Fourteenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey : First Spectroscopic Data from the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey and from the Second Phase of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. - : IOP Publishing Ltd. - 0067-0049 .- 1538-4365. ; 235:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The fourth generation of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS-IV) has been in operation since 2014 July. This paper describes the second data release from this phase, and the 14th from SDSS overall (making this Data Release Fourteen or DR14). This release makes the data taken by SDSS-IV in its first two years of operation (2014-2016 July) public. Like all previous SDSS releases, DR14 is cumulative, including the most recent reductions and calibrations of all data taken by SDSS since the first phase began operations in 2000. New in DR14 is the first public release of data from the extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey; the first data from the second phase of the Apache Point Observatory (APO) Galactic Evolution Experiment (APOGEE-2), including stellar parameter estimates from an innovative data-driven machine-learning algorithm known as "The Cannon"; and almost twice as many data cubes from the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at APO (MaNGA) survey as were in the previous release (N = 2812 in total). This paper describes the location and format of the publicly available data from the SDSS-IV surveys. We provide references to the important technical papers describing how these data have been taken (both targeting and observation details) and processed for scientific use. The SDSS web site (www.sdss.org) has been updated for this release and provides links to data downloads, as well as tutorials and examples of data use. SDSS-IV is planning to continue to collect astronomical data until 2020 and will be followed by SDSS-V.
|
|
| 4. |
- Aguado, D. S., et al.
(författare)
-
The Fifteenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys : First Release of MaNGA-derived Quantities, Data Visualization Tools, and Stellar Library
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. - : Institute of Physics Publishing (IOPP). - 0067-0049 .- 1538-4365. ; 240:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Twenty years have passed since first light for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (SDSS). Here, we release data taken by the fourth phase of SDSS (SDSS-IV) across its first three years of operation (2014 July-2017 July). This is the third data release for SDSS-IV, and the 15th from SDSS (Data Release Fifteen; DR15). New data come from MaNGA-we release 4824 data cubes, as well as the first stellar spectra in the MaNGA Stellar Library (MaStar), the first set of survey-supported analysis products (e.g., stellar and gas kinematics, emission-line and other maps) from the MaNGA Data Analysis Pipeline, and a new data visualization and access tool we call "Marvin." The next data release, DR16, will include new data from both APOGEE-2 and eBOSS; those surveys release no new data here, but we document updates and corrections to their data processing pipelines. The release is cumulative; it also includes the most recent reductions and calibrations of all data taken by SDSS since first light. In this paper, we describe the location and format of the data and tools and cite technical references describing how it was obtained and processed. The SDSS website (www.sdss.org) has also been updated, providing links to data downloads, tutorials, and examples of data use. Although SDSS-IV will continue to collect astronomical data until 2020, and will be followed by SDSS-V (2020-2025), we end this paper by describing plans to ensure the sustainability of the SDSS data archive for many years beyond the collection of data.
|
|
| 5. |
- Blanton, Michael R., et al.
(författare)
-
Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV : Mapping the Milky Way, Nearby Galaxies, and the Distant Universe
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Astronomical Journal. - : IOP Publishing Ltd. - 0004-6256 .- 1538-3881. ; 154:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- We describe the Sloan Digital Sky Survey IV (SDSS-IV), a project encompassing three major spectroscopic programs. The Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 (APOGEE-2) is observing hundreds of thousands of Milky Way stars at high resolution and. high signal-to-noise ratios in the near-infrared. The Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey is obtaining spatially resolved spectroscopy for thousands of nearby galaxies (median z similar to 0.03). The extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS) is mapping the galaxy, quasar, and neutral gas distributions between z similar to 0.6 and 3.5 to constrain cosmology using baryon acoustic oscillations, redshift space distortions, and the shape of the power spectrum. Within eBOSS, we are conducting two major subprograms: the SPectroscopic IDentification of eROSITA Sources (SPIDERS), investigating X-ray AGNs. and galaxies in X-ray clusters, and the Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey (TDSS), obtaining spectra of variable sources. All programs use the 2.5 m Sloan Foundation Telescope at the. Apache Point Observatory; observations there began in Summer 2014. APOGEE-2 also operates a second near-infrared spectrograph at the 2.5 m du Pont Telescope at Las Campanas Observatory, with observations beginning in early 2017. Observations at both facilities are scheduled to continue through 2020. In keeping with previous SDSS policy, SDSS-IV provides regularly scheduled public data releases; the first one, Data Release 13, was made available in 2016 July.
|
|
| 6. |
-
The Seventeenth Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys : Complete Release of MaNGA, MaStar, and APOGEE-2 Data
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. - : Institute of Physics (IOP). - 0067-0049 .- 1538-4365. ; 259:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper documents the seventeenth data release (DR17) from the Sloan Digital Sky Surveys; the fifth and final release from the fourth phase (SDSS-IV). DR17 contains the complete release of the Mapping Nearby Galaxies at Apache Point Observatory (MaNGA) survey, which reached its goal of surveying over 10,000 nearby galaxies. The complete release of the MaNGA Stellar Library accompanies this data, providing observations of almost 30,000 stars through the MaNGA instrument during bright time. DR17 also contains the complete release of the Apache Point Observatory Galactic Evolution Experiment 2 survey that publicly releases infrared spectra of over 650,000 stars. The main sample from the Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (eBOSS), as well as the subsurvey Time Domain Spectroscopic Survey data were fully released in DR16. New single-fiber optical spectroscopy released in DR17 is from the SPectroscipic IDentification of ERosita Survey subsurvey and the eBOSS-RM program. Along with the primary data sets, DR17 includes 25 new or updated value-added catalogs. This paper concludes the release of SDSS-IV survey data. SDSS continues into its fifth phase with observations already underway for the Milky Way Mapper, Local Volume Mapper, and Black Hole Mapper surveys.
|
|
| 7. |
- Dar, Pe'er, et al.
(författare)
-
Cell-free DNA screening for prenatal detection of 22q11.2 deletion syndrome.
- 2022
-
Ingår i: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1097-6868 .- 0002-9378. ; 227:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Prenatal screening has historically focused primarily on detection of fetal aneuploidies. Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) now enables noninvasive screening for subchromosomal copy number variants, including 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS or DiGeorge syndrome), which is the most common microdeletion and a leading cause of congenital heart defects and neurodevelopmental delay. Although smaller studies have demonstrated the feasibility of screening for 22q11.2DS, large cohort studies with postnatal confirmatory testing to assess test performance have not been reported.To assess the performance of SNP-based cfDNA prenatal screening for detection of 22q11.2DS.Patients who had SNP-based cfDNA prenatal screening for 22q11.2DS were prospectively enrolled at 21 centers in 6 countries. Prenatal or newborn DNA samples were requested in all cases for genetic confirmation with chromosomal microarray. The primary outcome was sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of cfDNA for detection of all deletions, including the classical deletion and nested deletions that are ≥500kb, in the 22q11.2 low copy repeat A-D region. Secondary outcomes included the prevalence of 22q11.2DS and performance of an updated cfDNA algorithm that was evaluated blinded to pregnancy outcome.Of 20,887 women enrolled, genetic outcome was available in 18,289 (87.6%). Twelve 22q11.2DS cases were confirmed in the cohort, including five (41.7%) nested deletions, yielding a prevalence of 1:1524. In the total cohort, cfDNA reported 17,976 (98.3%) as low risk for 22q11.2DS and 38 (0.2%) as high-risk; 275 (1.5%) were non-reportable. Overall, 9 of 12 cases of 22q11.2 were detected, yielding a sensitivity of 75.0% (95% CI: 42.8, 94.5); specificity of 99.84% (95% CI: 99.77, 99.89); PPV of 23.7% (95% CI: 11.44, 40.24) and NPV of 99.98% (95% CI: 99.95, 100). None of the cases with a non-reportable result was diagnosed with 22q11.2DS. The updated algorithm detected 10/12 cases (83.3%; 95% CI: 51.6-97.9) with a lower false positive rate (0.05% vs. 0.16%, p<0.001) and a PPV of 52.6% (10/19; 95% CI 28.9-75.6).Noninvasive cfDNA prenatal screening for 22q11.2DS can detect most affected cases, including smaller nested deletions, with a low false positive rate.
|
|
| 8. |
- Dar, Pe'er, et al.
(författare)
-
Cell-free DNA screening for trisomies 21, 18 and 13 in pregnancies at low and high risk for aneuploidy with genetic confirmation
- 2022
-
Ingår i: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1097-6868 .- 0002-9378. ; 227:2
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) non-invasive prenatal screening for trisomy (T) 21, 18, and 13 has been rapidly adopted into clinical practice. However, prior studies are limited by lack of follow up genetic testing to confirm outcomes and accurately assess test performance, particularly in women at low-risk for aneuploidy.To compare the performance of cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 between women at low and high-risk for aneuploidy in a large, prospective cohort with genetic confirmation of results.A multicenter prospective observational study at 21 centers in 6 countries. Women who had SNP-based cfDNA screening for T21, T18 and T13 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was obtained from prenatal or newborn DNA samples. Test performance and test failure (no-call) rates were assessed for the cohort and women with low and high prior risk for aneuploidy were compared. An updated cfDNA algorithm, blinded to pregnancy outcome, was also assessed.20,194 were enrolled at median gestational age of 12.6 weeks (IQR:11.6, 13.9). Genetic outcomes were confirmed in 17,851 (88.4%): 13,043 (73.1%) low-risk and 4,808 (26.9%) high-risk for aneuploidy. Overall, 133 trisomies were diagnosed (100 T21; 18 T18; 15 T13). cfDNA screen positive rate was lower in low- vs. high-risk (0.27% vs. 2.2%, p<0.0001). Sensitivity and specificity were similar between groups. The positive predictive value (PPV) for the low and high-risk groups was 85.7% vs. 97.5%, p=0.058 for T21; 50.0% vs. 81.3%, p=0.283 for T18; and 62.5% vs. 83.3, p=0.58 for T13, respectively. Overall, 602 (3.4%) patients had no-call result after the first draw and 287 (1.61%) after including cases with a second draw. Trisomy rate was higher in the 287 with no-call results than patients with a result on a first draw (2.8% vs. 0.7%, p=0.001). The updated algorithm showed similar sensitivity and specificity to the study algorhitm with a lower no-call rate.In women at low-risk for aneuploidy, SNP-based cfDNA has high sensitivity and specificity, PPV of 85.7% for T21 and 74.3% for the three common trisomies. Patients who receive a no-call result are at increased risk of aneuploidy and require additional investigation.
|
|
| 9. |
- Martin, Kimberly, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of high-risk prenatal screening results for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome on obstetric and neonatal management: Secondary analysis from the SMART study
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Prenatal Diagnosis. - 0197-3851 .- 1097-0223. ; 43:13, s. 1574-1580
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: One goal of prenatal genetic screening is to optimize perinatal care and improve infant outcomes. We sought to determine whether high-risk cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) affected prenatal or neonatal management. Methods: This was a secondary analysis from the SMART study. Patients with high-risk cfDNA results for 22q11.2DS were compared with the low-risk cohort for pregnancy characteristics and obstetrical management. To assess differences in neonatal care, we compared high-risk neonates without prenatal genetic confirmation with a 1:1 matched low-risk cohort. Results: Of 18,020 eligible participants enrolled between 2015 and 2019, 38 (0.21%) were high-risk and 17,982 (99.79%) were low-risk for 22q11.2DS by cfDNA screening. High-risk participants had more prenatal diagnostic testing (55.3%; 21/38 vs. 2.0%; 352/17,982, p<0.001) and fetal echocardiography (76.9%; 10/13 vs. 19.6%; 10/51, p<0.001). High-risk newborns without prenatal diagnostic testing had higher rates of neonatal genetic testing (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 0%; 0/51, P<0.001), echocardiography (30.8%; 4/13 vs. 4.0%; 2/50, p=0.013), evaluation of calcium levels (46.2%; 6/13 vs. 4.1%; 2/49, P<0.001) and lymphocyte count (53.8%; 7/13 vs. 15.7%; 8/51, p=0.008). Conclusions: High-risk screening results for 22q11.2DS were associated with higher rates of prenatal and neonatal diagnostic genetic testing and other 22q11.2DS-specific evaluations. However, these interventions were not universally performed, and >50% of high-risk infants were discharged without genetic testing, representing possible missed opportunities to improve outcomes for affected individuals.
|
|
| 10. |
- Martin, Kimberly, et al.
(författare)
-
Performance of prenatal cfDNA screening for sex chromosomes.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics. - 1530-0366. ; 25:8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To assess the performance of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening to detect sex chromosome aneuploidies (SCA) in an unselected obstetrical population with genetic confirmation.This was a planned secondary analysis of the multicenter, prospective SMART study. Patients receiving cfDNA results for autosomal aneuploidies and who had confirmatory genetic results for the relevant sex chromosomal aneuploidies were included. Screening performance for SCAs, including monosomy X (MX) and the sex chromosome trisomies (SCTs; 47,XXX; 47,XXY; 47,XYY) was determined. Fetal sex concordance between cfDNA and genetic screening was also evaluated in euploid pregnancies.17,538 cases met inclusion criteria. Performance of cfDNA for MX, SCTs and fetal sex was determined in 17,297, 10,333 and 14,486 pregnancies, respectively. Sensitivity, specificity, and PPV of cfDNA were 83.3%, 99.9%, and 22.7% for MX, and 70.4%, 99.9%, and 82.6% for the combined SCTs. The accuracy of fetal sex prediction by cfDNA was 100%.Screening performance of cfDNA for SCAs is comparable to that reported in other studies. The PPV for the SCTs was similar to the autosomal trisomies, while the PPV for MX was substantially lower. No discordance in fetal sex was observed between cfDNA and postnatal genetic screening in euploid pregnancies. These data will assist interpretation and counseling for cfDNA results for sex chromosomes.
|
|
| 11. |
- Norton, Mary E, et al.
(författare)
-
Obstetrical, perinatal and genetic outcomes associated with non-reportable prenatal cell free DNA screening results.
- 2023
-
Ingår i: American journal of obstetrics and gynecology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9378 .- 1097-6868. ; 229:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The clinical implications of non-reportable cfDNA screening results are uncertain, but this may reflect poor placental implantation in some cases and be associated with adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes.To assess the outcomes of pregnancies with non-reportable cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening in a cohort of patients with complete genetic and obstetric outcomes.This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective observational study of prenatal cfDNA screening for fetal aneuploidy and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Participants who underwent cfDNA screening from April 2015 through January 2019 were offered participation. Obstetric outcomes and neonatal genetic testing results were collected from 21 primary care and referral centers in the US, Europe, and Australia. The primary outcome was risk for adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes (aneuploidy, preterm birth (PTB) at <28, <34, and <37 weeks' gestation, preeclampsia, small for gestational age (SGA) or birthweight <10th percentile for gestational week, and a composite outcome that included PTB<37 weeks, preeclampsia, SGA, and stillbirth>20 weeks') after non-reportable cfDNA screening due to low fetal fraction or other causes. Multivariable analyses were performed, adjusting for variables known to be associated with obstetrical and perinatal outcomes, non-reportable results, or fetal fraction.In total, 25,199 pregnant individuals were screened, and 20,194 were enrolled. Genetic confirmation was missing in 1165 (5.8%), 1085 (5.4%) were lost to follow-up, and 93 (0.5%) withdrew; the final study cohort included 17,851 (88.4%) participants who had cfDNA, fetal or newborn genetic confirmatory testing, and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes collected. Results were non-reportable in 602 (3.4%). A sample was redrawn and testing again attempted in 427; in 112 (26.2%) results were again non-reportable. Non-reportable results were associated with higher BMI, chronic hypertension, later gestational age, lower fetal fraction, and Black race. Trisomy 13, 18, or 21 was confirmed in 1.6% with non-reportable tests vs. 0.7% with results (p=.013). PTB <28, 34, and 37 weeks, preeclampsia, and the composite outcome were higher after non-reportable results, and further increased with a second non-reportable test, while SGA was not increased. After adjustment for confounders, the aOR for aneuploidy was 2.2 (95% CI 1.1, 4.4) and 2.6 (95% CI 0.6, 10.8) and for the composite outcome was 1.5 (95% CI 1.2, 1.8) and 2.1 (95% CI 1.4, 3.2) after a first and second non-reportable test. In all, 94.9% of patients with non-reportable tests had a livebirth as compared to 98.8% with those with test results obtained (aOR for livebirth: 0.20 [95% CI 0.13-0.30]).Patients with non-reportable cfDNA results are at increased risk for a number of adverse outcomes, including aneuploidy as well as preeclampsia and preterm birth. They should be offered diagnostic genetic testing and clinicians should be aware of the increased risk of pregnancy complications.
|
|
| 12. |
- Norton, Mary E., et al.
(författare)
-
Obstetrical, Perinatal, and Genetic Outcomes Associated With Nonreportable Prenatal Cell-Free DNA Screening Results
- 2024
-
Ingår i: OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY. - 0029-7828 .- 1533-9866. ; 79:3, s. 146-148
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although cell-free DNA (cfDNA) prenatal screening is widely used and has high sensitivity and specificity, there are circumstances in which the screening does not provide an interpretable result. Although this is relatively uncommon, it happens enough that clinical implications and potential reasons for follow-up should be studied and assessed. This study was designed to evaluate outcomes for pregnancies with nonreportable results on cfDNA screening tests. This study was a secondary analysis of the data from a multicenter prospective observational study of cfDNA screening for aneuploidy and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. All patients were tested for trisomies 13, 18, and 21, as well as the 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, and all patients had confirmatory testing on the newborns in addition to collecting obstetric and perinatal outcomes. Inclusion criteria were women older than 18 years and at greater than 9 weeks of gestation with a singleton pregnancy. Exclusion criteria were having received cfDNA screening results before enrollment, organ transplant, ovum donation, vanishing twin, or being unwilling to provide a newborn sample. The primary outcome was the rate of adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcomes, including aneuploidy; preterm birth at less than 28, 34, or 37 weeks' gestation; preeclampsia; small for gestational age birth; and a composite outcome that included preterm birth before 37 weeks, preeclampsia, stillbirth at greater than 20 weeks, and small for gestational age. Final analyses included 17,851 individuals who had cfDNA screening, confirmatory genetic testing on the newborn, and obstetrical and perinatal outcomes recorded. Nonreportable results were found in 602 individuals (3.4%) after the first draw, with 32.2% of these due to low fetal fraction. Another third of the cohort had patterns where the risk of aneuploidy was uninterpretable but with an adequate fetal fraction, and in the final third, the fetal fraction could not be measured. Of the original 602 cases of nonreportable findings, 427 had a second draw, with 112 of these (26.2%) again having nonreportable results. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics of age and parity for those with successful versus nonreportable test results; gestational age was significantly higher in individuals with nonreportable results (14.4 vs 13.4 weeks, P < 0.001), as was body mass index (26.2 vs 31.3), and the rate of chronic hypertension (4.0% vs 9.7%). In this cohort, there were 133 genetically confirmed trisomies, with 100 fetuses with trisomy 21, 18 individuals with trisomy 18, and 15 individuals with trisomy 13. Overall, the rate of aneuploidy was 1.7% in individuals with nonreportable results, versus 0.7% in those with reported results (P = 0.013; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.0). Rates of preterm birth were also higher in those with nonreportable test results, with delivery at less than 34 weeks at 1.5% in those with a test result, 4.6% in those with one nonreportable test result and 6.9% in those with a second nonreportable test result (aOR, 2.2 and 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4-3.4 and 1.2-6.0, respectively). Preeclampsia showed a similar trend, with rates climbing from 3.9% in those with a reported result to 9.4% with 1 nonreportable result and 16.8% with 2 (aOR, 1.4 and 2.0; 95% CI, 1.0-1.9 and 1.1-3.7, respectively). Chances of live birth were significantly reduced in pregnancies with a nonreportable results (aOR, 0.20; 95% CI, 0.13-0.30), with the chances decreasing more after a second nonreportable test result (aOR, 0. 11; 95% CI, 0.06-0.23). The study found that nonreportable cfDNA screening results are associated with an increased risk for aneuploidy, preterm birth, and preeclampsia, with a gradient of increased risk with a second failed test. This adds to literature with conflicting findings surrounding obstetrical complications in those with altered cfDNA levels and with most studies largely focused on characteristics that may be predictive of a nonreportable result rather than outcomes associated with nonreportable results. These results can inform clinicians who have patients with nonreportable test results in a way that may help them provide better care; future research should focus on more fully understanding the adverse outcomes associated with nonreportable tests to maximize this ability for clinicians in the future. Further research should also focus on specific populations or diagnoses to understand if there are fundamental differences in different groups of individuals.
|
|
