| 1. |
- Ekhtiari, Hamed, et al.
(författare)
-
A methodological checklist for fMRI drug cue reactivity studies : development and expert consensus
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Nature Protocols. - : Nature Portfolio. - 1754-2189 .- 1750-2799. ; 17:3, s. 567-595
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cue reactivity measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging is used in studies of substance-use disorders. This Consensus Statement is the result of a Delphi process to arrive at parameters that should be reported in describing these studies. Cue reactivity is one of the most frequently used paradigms in functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies of substance use disorders (SUDs). Although there have been promising results elucidating the neurocognitive mechanisms of SUDs and SUD treatments, the interpretability and reproducibility of these studies is limited by incomplete reporting of participants characteristics, task design, craving assessment, scanning preparation and analysis decisions in fMRI drug cue reactivity (FDCR) experiments. This hampers clinical translation, not least because systematic review and meta-analysis of published work are difficult. This consensus paper and Delphi study aims to outline the important methodological aspects of FDCR research, present structured recommendations for more comprehensive methods reporting and review the FDCR literature to assess the reporting of items that are deemed important. Forty-five FDCR scientists from around the world participated in this study. First, an initial checklist of items deemed important in FDCR studies was developed by several members of the Enhanced NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta-Analyses (ENIGMA) Addiction working group on the basis of a systematic review. Using a modified Delphi consensus method, all experts were asked to comment on, revise or add items to the initial checklist, and then to rate the importance of each item in subsequent rounds. The reporting status of the items in the final checklist was investigated in 108 recently published FDCR studies identified through a systematic review. By the final round, 38 items reached the consensus threshold and were classified under seven major categories: Participants Characteristics, General fMRI Information, General Task Information, Cue Information, Craving Assessment Inside Scanner, Craving Assessment Outside Scanner and Pre- and Post-Scanning Considerations. The review of the 108 FDCR papers revealed significant gaps in the reporting of the items considered important by the experts. For instance, whereas items in the General fMRI Information category were reported in 90.5% of the reviewed papers, items in the Pre- and Post-Scanning Considerations category were reported by only 44.7% of reviewed FDCR studies. Considering the notable and sometimes unexpected gaps in the reporting of items deemed to be important by experts in any FDCR study, the protocols could benefit from the adoption of reporting standards. This checklist, a living document to be updated as the field and its methods advance, can help improve experimental design, reporting and the widespread understanding of the FDCR protocols. This checklist can also provide a sample for developing consensus statements for protocols in other areas of task-based fMRI.
|
|
| 2. |
- Sangchooli, Arshiya, et al.
(författare)
-
Parameter Space and Potential for Biomarker Development in 25 Years of fMRI Drug Cue Reactivity
- 2024
-
Ingår i: JAMA psychiatry. - : AMER MEDICAL ASSOC. - 2168-6238 .- 2168-622X.
-
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Importance In the last 25 years, functional magnetic resonance imaging drug cue reactivity (FDCR) studies have characterized some core aspects in the neurobiology of drug addiction. However, no FDCR-derived biomarkers have been approved for treatment development or clinical adoption. Traversing this translational gap requires a systematic assessment of the FDCR literature evidence, its heterogeneity, and an evaluation of possible clinical uses of FDCR-derived biomarkers. Objective To summarize the state of the field of FDCR, assess their potential for biomarker development, and outline a clear process for biomarker qualification to guide future research and validation efforts. Evidence Review The PubMed and Medline databases were searched for every original FDCR investigation published from database inception until December 2022. Collected data covered study design, participant characteristics, FDCR task design, and whether each study provided evidence that might potentially help develop susceptibility, diagnostic, response, prognostic, predictive, or severity biomarkers for 1 or more addictive disorders. Findings There were 415 FDCR studies published between 1998 and 2022. Most focused on nicotine (122 [29.6%]), alcohol (120 [29.2%]), or cocaine (46 [11.1%]), and most used visual cues (354 [85.3%]). Together, these studies recruited 19 311 participants, including 13 812 individuals with past or current substance use disorders. Most studies could potentially support biomarker development, including diagnostic (143 [32.7%]), treatment response (141 [32.3%]), severity (84 [19.2%]), prognostic (30 [6.9%]), predictive (25 [5.7%]), monitoring (12 [2.7%]), and susceptibility (2 [0.5%]) biomarkers. A total of 155 interventional studies used FDCR, mostly to investigate pharmacological (67 [43.2%]) or cognitive/behavioral (51 [32.9%]) interventions; 141 studies used FDCR as a response measure, of which 125 (88.7%) reported significant interventional FDCR alterations; and 25 studies used FDCR as an intervention outcome predictor, with 24 (96%) finding significant associations between FDCR markers and treatment outcomes. Conclusions and Relevance Based on this systematic review and the proposed biomarker development framework, there is a pathway for the development and regulatory qualification of FDCR-based biomarkers of addiction and recovery. Further validation could support the use of FDCR-derived measures, potentially accelerating treatment development and improving diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive clinical judgments.
|
|
| 3. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
Commissioning of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer with cosmic rays
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Physical Journal C. Particles and Fields. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1434-6044 .- 1434-6052. ; 70:3, s. 875-916
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider has collected several hundred million cosmic ray events during 2008 and 2009. These data were used to commission the Muon Spectrometer and to study the performance of the trigger and tracking chambers, their alignment, the detector control system, the data acquisition and the analysis programs. We present the performance in the relevant parameters that determine the quality of the muon measurement. We discuss the single element efficiency, resolution and noise rates, the calibration method of the detector response and of the alignment system, the track reconstruction efficiency and the momentum measurement. The results show that the detector is close to the design performance and that the Muon Spectrometer is ready to detect muons produced in high energy proton-proton collisions.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
Readiness of the ATLAS Tile Calorimeter for LHC collisions
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Physical Journal C. Particles and Fields. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1434-6044 .- 1434-6052. ; 70:4, s. 1193-1236
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Tile hadronic calorimeter of the ATLAS detector has undergone extensive testing in the experimental hall since its installation in late 2005. The readout, control and calibration systems have been fully operational since 2007 and the detector has successfully collected data from the LHC single beams in 2008 and first collisions in 2009. This paper gives an overview of the Tile Calorimeter performance as measured using random triggers, calibration data, data from cosmic ray muons and single beam data. The detector operation status, noise characteristics and performance of the calibration systems are presented, as well as the validation of the timing and energy calibration carried out with minimum ionising cosmic ray muons data. The calibration systems' precision is well below the design value of 1%. The determination of the global energy scale was performed with an uncertainty of 4%.
|
|
| 6. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
Studies of the performance of the ATLAS detector using cosmic-ray muons
- 2011
-
Ingår i: European Physical Journal C. Particles and Fields. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1434-6044 .- 1434-6052. ; 71:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Muons from cosmic-ray interactions in the atmosphere provide a high-statistics source of particles that can be used to study the performance and calibration of the ATLAS detector. Cosmic-ray muons can penetrate to the cavern and deposit energy in all detector subsystems. Such events have played an important role in the commissioning of the detector since the start of the installation phase in 2005 and were particularly important for understanding the detector performance in the time prior to the arrival of the first LHC beams. Global cosmic-ray runs were undertaken in both 2008 and 2009 and these data have been used through to the early phases of collision data-taking as a tool for calibration, alignment and detector monitoring. These large datasets have also been used for detector performance studies, including investigations that rely on the combined performance of different subsystems. This paper presents the results of performance studies related to combined tracking, lepton identification and the reconstruction of jets and missing transverse energy. Results are compared to expectations based on a cosmic-ray event generator and a full simulation of the detector response.
|
|
| 7. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
The ATLAS Inner Detector commissioning and calibration
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Physical Journal C. Particles and Fields. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1434-6044 .- 1434-6052. ; 70:3, s. 787-821
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The ATLAS Inner Detector is a composite tracking system consisting of silicon pixels, silicon strips and straw tubes in a 2 T magnetic field. Its installation was completed in August 2008 and the detector took part in data-taking with single LHC beams and cosmic rays. The initial detector operation, hardware commissioning and in-situ calibrations are described. Tracking performance has been measured with 7.6 million cosmic-ray events, collected using a tracking trigger and reconstructed with modular pattern-recognition and fitting software. The intrinsic hit efficiency and tracking trigger efficiencies are close to 100%. Lorentz angle measurements for both electrons and holes, specific energy-loss calibration and transition radiation turn-on measurements have been performed. Different alignment techniques have been used to reconstruct the detector geometry. After the initial alignment, a transverse impact parameter resolution of 22.1 +/- 0.9 mu m and a relative momentum resolution sigma (p) /p=(4.83 +/- 0.16)x10(-4) GeV(-1)xp (T) have been measured for high momentum tracks.
|
|
| 8. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
The ATLAS Simulation Infrastructure
- 2010
-
Ingår i: European Physical Journal C. Particles and Fields. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1434-6044 .- 1434-6052. ; 70:3, s. 823-874
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The simulation software for the ATLAS Experiment at the Large Hadron Collider is being used for large-scale production of events on the LHC Computing Grid. This simulation requires many components, from the generators that simulate particle collisions, through packages simulating the response of the various detectors and triggers. All of these components come together under the ATLAS simulation infrastructure. In this paper, that infrastructure is discussed, including that supporting the detector description, interfacing the event generation, and combining the GEANT4 simulation of the response of the individual detectors. Also described are the tools allowing the software validation, performance testing, and the validation of the simulated output against known physics processes.
|
|
| 9. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 10. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 11. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 12. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 13. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 14. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2013
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 15. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 16. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 17. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 18. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 19. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 20. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 21. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 22. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 23. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 24. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 25. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 26. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 27. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 28. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 29. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 30. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 31. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 32. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 33. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 34. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2013
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 35. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 36. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 37. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 38. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 39. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 40. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 41. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 42. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 43. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 44. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 45. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 46. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 47. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 48. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 49. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2012
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 50. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
