| 1. |
- Charytan, David M, et al.
(author)
-
Early angiography in patients with chronic kidney disease : a collaborative systematic review
- 2009
-
In: Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology. - 1555-905X .- 1555-9041. ; 4:6, s. 1032-1043
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In the general population, an early invasive strategy of routine coronary angiography is superior to a conservative strategy of selective angiography in patients who are admitted with unstable angina or non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), but the effectiveness of this strategy in individuals with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is uncertain. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, & MEASUREMENTS: We conducted a collaborative meta-analysis with data provided by the main authors of identified trials to estimate the effectiveness of early angiography in patients with CKD. The Cochrane, Medline, and EMBASE databases were searched to identify randomized trials that compared invasive and conservative strategies in patients with unstable angina or non-ST MI. Pooled risks ratios were estimated using data from enrolled patients with estimated GFR <60 ml/min per 1.73 m(2). RESULTS: Five randomized trials that enrolled 1453 patients with CKD were included. An early invasive strategy was associated with nonsignificant reductions in all-cause mortality, nonfatal MI, and a composite of death or nonfatal MI. The invasive strategy significantly reduced rehospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: This collaborative study suggests that the benefits of an early invasive strategy are preserved in patients with CKD and that an early invasive approach reduces the risk for rehospitalization and is associated with trends of reduction in the risk for death and nonfatal re-infarction in patients with CKD. Coronary angiography should be considered for patients who have CKD and are admitted with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes.
|
|
| 2. |
- Kacerovsky, Marian, et al.
(author)
-
Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation: a heterogeneous group with differences in adverse outcomes.
- 2022
-
In: The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1476-4954. ; 35:25, s. 9145-9156
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The absence of microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation at the time of hospital admission is the most common condition associated with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM). Although the intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response does not exceed the threshold for the diagnosis of intra-amniotic inflammation in this subgroup of PPROM, whether there could be differences in outcomes concerning the intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response remains unclear. Therefore, the main aims of this study on PPROM without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation were (i) to characterize the association between the intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response, measured according to amniotic fluid interleukin (IL)-6 concentrations, and the presence of acute histological chorioamnionitis and acute inflammation in the amnion; (ii) to characterize the association between the intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response and fetal inflammatory response, and (iii) to describe the short-term morbidity of infants based on the intensity of intra-amniotic inflammatory response.This retrospective study included 131 women with singleton pregnancies with PPROM without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation between gestational ages of 24+0 and 36+6weeks and who had delivered within 72h of membrane rupture. Microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity was assessed based on a combination of cultivation and non-cultivation methods. Intra-amniotic inflammation was characterized based on the amniotic fluid IL-6 concentration. In addition, a histopathological assessment of the placenta was performed. Fetal inflammatory response syndrome was characterized according to IL-6 concentration in the umbilical cord blood of >11pg/mL. Based on the quartiles of IL-6 concentrations in the amniotic fluid, these women were divided into four subgroups (from the lowest to the highest IL-6 concentrations).IL-6 concentrations in amniotic fluid were higher in women with acute histological chorioamnionitis (median: 819pg/mL vs. 520pg/mL; p=.003) and with acute inflammation of the amnion (median: 1116pg/mL vs. 533pg/mL; p=.0002) than in women without these complications. The rates of acute histological chorioamnionitis and acute inflammation of the amnion were the highest in the subgroup with IL-6 concentrations above the 75th percentile in amniotic fluid (chorioamnionitis, p=.02; amnion, p=.0002). No differences in IL-6 concentrations in amniotic fluid were identified between women with and without a fetal inflammatory response syndrome (p=.40). The rate of fetal inflammatory response syndrome did not vary among the amniotic fluid IL-6 quartile subgroups of women. Moreover, no differences were noted in short-term neonatal outcomes among the amniotic fluid IL-6 quartile subgroups.A higher intensity of the intra-amniotic inflammatory response, measured by amniotic fluid IL-6 concentrations, is associated with a higher rate of acute inflammatory lesions in the placenta in the subset of PPROM pregnancies without microbial invasion of the amniotic cavity and intra-amniotic inflammation.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- O'Donoghue, Michelle, et al.
(author)
-
Early invasive vs conservative treatment strategies in women and men with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis
- 2008
-
In: Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA). - : American Medical Association (AMA). - 0098-7484 .- 1538-3598. ; 300:1, s. 71-80
-
Research review (peer-reviewed)abstract
- CONTEXT: Although an invasive strategy is frequently used in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACS), data from some trials suggest that this strategy may not benefit women. OBJECTIVE: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized trials to compare the effects of an invasive vs conservative strategy in women and men with NSTE ACS. DATA SOURCES: Trials were identified through a computerized literature search of the MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (1970-April 2008) using the search terms invasive strategy, conservative strategy, selective invasive strategy, acute coronary syndromes, non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction, and unstable angina. STUDY SELECTION: Randomized clinical trials comparing an invasive vs conservative treatment strategy in patients with NSTE ACS. DATA EXTRACTION: The principal investigators for each trial provided the sex-specific incidences of death, myocardial infarction (MI), and rehospitalization with ACS through 12 months of follow-up. DATA SYNTHESIS: Data were combined across 8 trials (3075 women and 7075 men). The odds ratio (OR) for the composite of death, MI, or ACS for invasive vs conservative strategy in women was 0.81 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65-1.01; 21.1% vs 25.0%) and in men was 0.73 (95% CI, 0.55-0.98; 21.2% vs 26.3%) without significant heterogeneity between sexes (P for interaction = .26). Among biomarker-positive women, an invasive strategy was associated with a 33% lower odds of death, MI, or ACS (OR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.50-0.88) and a nonsignificant 23% lower odds of death or MI (OR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.47-1.25). In contrast, an invasive strategy was not associated with a significant reduction in the triple composite end point in biomarker-negative women (OR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.61-1.44; P for interaction = .36) and was associated with a nonsignificant 35% higher odds of death or MI (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.78-2.35; P for interaction = .08). Among men, the OR for death, MI, or ACS was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.46-0.67) if biomarker-positive and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.51-1.01) if biomarker-negative (P for interaction = .09). CONCLUSIONS: In NSTE ACS, an invasive strategy has a comparable benefit in men and high-risk women for reducing the composite end point of death, MI, or rehospitalization with ACS. In contrast, our data provide evidence supporting the new guideline recommendation for a conservative strategy in low-risk women.
|
|
| 5. |
- O'Donoghue, Michelle L., et al.
(author)
-
An Invasive or Conservative Strategy in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Non-ST-Segment Elevation Acute Coronary Syndromes A Collaborative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
- 2012
-
In: Journal of the American College of Cardiology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0735-1097 .- 1558-3597. ; 60:2, s. 106-111
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Objectives The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to examine an invasive or conservative strategy in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients. Background Diabetic patients are at increased risk of cardiovascular events after an acute coronary syndrome, yet it remains unknown whether they derive enhanced benefit from an invasive strategy.Methods Randomized trials comparing an invasive versus conservative treatment strategy were identified. The prevalence of cardiovascular events through 12 months was reported for each trial, stratified by diabetes mellitus status and randomized treatment strategy. Relative risk (RR) ratios and absolute risk reductions were combined using random-effects models.Results Data were combined across 9 trials comprising 9,904 subjects of whom 1,789 (18.1%) had diabetes mellitus. The RRs for death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), or rehospitalization with an acute coronary syndrome for an invasive versus conservative strategy were similar between diabetic patients (RR: 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.73 to 1.03) and nondiabetic patients (RR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.70 to 1.06; p interaction = 0.83). An invasive strategy reduced nonfatal MI in diabetic patients (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.55 to 0.92), but not in nondiabetic patients (RR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.29; p interaction = 0.09). The absolute risk reduction in MI with an invasive strategy was greater in diabetic than nondiabetic patients (absolute risk reduction: 3.7% vs. 0.1%; p interaction = 0.02). There were no differences in death or stroke between groups (p interactions 0.68 and 0.20, respectively).Conclusions An early invasive strategy yielded similar RR reductions in overall cardiovascular events in diabetic and nondiabetic patients. However, an invasive strategy appeared to reduce recurrent nonfatal MI to a greater extent in diabetic patients. These data support the updated guidelines that recommend an invasive strategy for patients with diabetes mellitus and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.
|
|
