| 1. |
- Gustavsson, Simon T., et al.
(författare)
-
Nicotinamide prevents retinal vascular dropout in a rat model of ocular hypertension and supports ocular blood supply in glaucoma patients
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science. - : Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology (ARVO). - 0146-0404 .- 1552-5783. ; 64
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PURPOSE. To investigate whether nicotinamide (NAM) modulates retinal vasculature in glaucoma.METHODS. This was a prospective controlled clinical trial investigating animal and human histopathology. Participants included normotensive and ocular hypertensive rats, postmortem human ocular tissue, glaucoma patients (n = 90), and healthy controls (n = 30). The study utilized histopathology, computer-assisted retinal vasculature analysis, optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA), and NAM treatment. The main outcome measures included retinal vascular parameters in rats as assessed by AngioTool; retinal vasculature integrity in rats and humans as assessed by histopathology, antibody-staining, and ImageJ-based measurements; and retinal perfusion density (PD) and flux index in humans as assessed by OCTA.RESULTS. A number of vessel parameters were altered in ocular hypertension/glaucoma compared to healthy controls. NAM treatment improved the retinal vasculature in ocular hypertensive rats, with an increase in mean vessel area, percentage area covered by vessels, total vessel length, total junctions, and junction density as assessed by AngioTool (all P < 0.05); vessel wall integrity as assessed by VE-cadherin antibody staining was also improved (P < 0.01). In humans, as assessed by OCTA, increases in PD in the optic nerve head and macula complete image (0.7%, P = 0.04 and 1.0%, P = 0.002, respectively) in healthy controls, and an increase in the temporal quadrant of the macula (0.7%, P = 0.02) in glaucoma patients was seen after NAM treatment.CONCLUSIONS. NAM can prevent retinal vascular damage in an animal model of glaucoma. After NAM treatment, glaucoma patients and healthy controls demonstrated a small increase in retinal vessel parameters as assessed by OCTA.
|
|
| 2. |
- Rutigliani, Carola, et al.
(författare)
-
Widespread retina and optic nerve neuroinflammation in enucleated eyes from glaucoma patients
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Acta neuropathologica communications. - : BioMed Central. - 2051-5960. ; 10:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Neuroinflammation is recognized as a key component of neurodegenerative disease. In glaucoma, a common neurodegenerative disease and the leading cause of irreversible blindness, the evidence for neuroinflammation in patients is lacking. Animal models have demonstrated significant pro-inflammatory activation of resident glia in the retina, as well as influx of blood-derived monocytes and pro-inflammatory factors. Confirmation of this in human donor tissue has been challenging due to a lack of well-preserved and well-characterized post-mortem tissue. To address this we utilize archived, wax embedded eyes fixed immediately following enucleation from living glaucoma patients. We compared glaucoma to control eyes (enucleated for uveal melanoma where the tumor did not impact the central retina or optic nerve). We performed immunolabelling for neurodegenerative and glial markers (CD45, CD163, IBA1, GFAP, Vimentin) which were quantified by high-resolution light microscopy and image analysis in FIJI. Glaucoma eyes demonstrated significant neural loss consistent with advanced neurodegeneration. IBA1 and GFAP were significantly increased in the retina and optic nerve head of the glaucomatous eyes indicating that significant neuroinflammation had occurred which support findings in animal models. Inflammation is a treatable symptom of many diseases and as such, identification of earlier inflammatory processes in glaucoma could be important for potential future treatment options.
|
|
| 3. |
- Stålhammar, Gustav
(författare)
-
Validation of biomarkers and digital image analysis in breast pathology
- 2017
-
Doktorsavhandling (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- For women worldwide, the risk of developing breast cancer is second only to that of nonmelanoma skin cancer. Significant improvements have been made in survival over the past decades and today about 80 % of the patients survive 10 years or more after their breast cancer diagnosis. Still, far from all patients enjoy the relatively good survival indicated by statistics on breast cancer patients as one homogenous group. Improving prognostication of aggressive vs. less aggressive disease, and to separate tumors based on genetic differences for optimal treatment strategies, is therefore the focus of intensive research, including this thesis. In paper I, we compared if tumor characteristics differ depending on what method of sampling the tumor that have been used for analysis. We compared routine immunohistochemistry on surgically resected breast specimens, including stains of the Estrogen receptor alpha (ER), the Progesterone receptor (PR), Human Epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) and the proliferation-associated protein Ki67, with analysis of the same stains done on material obtained from fine needle aspiration (immunocytochemistry). We found that there were substantial differences in the expression of these biomarkers between the two methods. Thus, the same rules for interpretation of biomarkers cannot be used for immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry, and consequently, validation of each method should be performed individually. In paper II, we explored the scope of digital image analysis in biomarker evaluations. We scored ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 status in several different regions of breast tumors by both manual methods and digital image analysis. The outcomes of the scoring of these biomarkers were then combined into IHC surrogate subtypes and compared to PAM50 gene expression-based subtypes as well as patient survival. All tested methods of automated digital image analysis of Ki67 outperformed manual scores in terms of sensitivity and specificity for the Luminal B subtype. Comparing digital versus manual testing concordance to all breast cancer subtypes as determined by PAM50 assays, the digital approach was superior to the manual method. The manual and digital image analysis methods matched each other in hazard ratio for all-cause mortality of patients with tumors with a “high” vs “low” Ki67 index. Manual assessments of the biomarkers ER, PR, HER2 and Ki67 were in most aspects less precise than digital image analysis. In paper III, we evolved the concept of paper I with an evaluation of the concordance of consecutive Ki67 assessments performed on fine needle aspiration cytology versus resected tumor specimens. We investigated how a status of Ki67 “low” and “high” as determined by immunohistochemistry and immunocytochemistry corresponded to overall survival, respectively. Again, Ki67-index varied when the two methods were used on the same tumors, and was prone to switch the classification between low and high proliferation. ER evaluations were discordant in 5.3 % of the tumors, which in the clinical setting would mean that 1 in 20 patients would risk being left out of beneficial endocrine treatment or being given it without benefit. Ki67 “high”, as determined by immunohistochemistry, defined as a proportion of Ki67-positive cells above the 67th percentile of the material, was significantly associated with poor overall survival and a significantly higher probability of axillary lymph node metastasis. This could not be reproduced for immunocytochemistry. In summary, this study adds to the results of paper I, in which we showed discordance between the methods. By including survival data, we now conclude that not merely are the methods discordant, but immunocytochemistry fails to provide prognostic information. Consequently, immunohistochemistry should be regarded as the superior method. In paper IV, we focused on proliferation comparing the results in the tumors’ hot spot, in the tumor periphery, and as the average proportion of Ki67-positive cells across the whole tumor section. Both manual and digital scores of Ki67 and the recently described marker for mitotic activity, PHH3, were evaluated along with mitotic counts. Their sensitivity and specificity for the gene expression based Luminal B versus A breast cancer subtypes, for the high versus low transcriptomic grade, for axillary lymph node status as well as for their prognostic value for breast cancer specific and overall survival were analyzed. Digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots outperformed the other markers in sensitivity and specificity both for gene expression subtypes and transcriptomic grade. In contrast to mitotic counts, tumors with high expression of Ki67, as defined by digital image analysis and high numbers of PHH3-positive cells, had significantly increased HR for all-cause mortality at 10 years from diagnosis. When we replaced the manual mitotic counts with digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots as the marker for proliferation when determining histological grade, the differences in estimated mean overall survival between the highest and lowest grades increased. It also added significantly more prognostic information to the classic Nottingham combined histological grade. We conclude that digital image analysis of Ki67 in hot spots might be suggested as the marker of choice for proliferative activity in breast cancer.
|
|
| 4. |
- Tesi, Bianca, et al.
(författare)
-
Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of germline sequencing in children with CNS and extracranial solid tumors : a nationwide, prospective Swedish study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: The Lancet Regional Health. - : Elsevier. - 2666-7762. ; 39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BackgroundChildhood cancer predisposition (ChiCaP) syndromes are increasingly recognized as contributing factors to childhood cancer development. Yet, due to variable availability of germline testing, many children with ChiCaP might go undetected today. We report results from the nationwide and prospective ChiCaP study that investigated diagnostic yield and clinical impact of integrating germline whole-genome sequencing (gWGS) with tumor sequencing and systematic phenotyping in children with solid tumors.MethodsgWGS was performed in 309 children at diagnosis of CNS (n = 123, 40%) or extracranial (n = 186, 60%) solid tumors and analyzed for disease-causing variants in 189 known cancer predisposing genes. Tumor sequencing data were available for 74% (227/309) of patients. In addition, a standardized clinical assessment for underlying predisposition was performed in 95% (293/309) of patients.FindingsThe prevalence of ChiCaP diagnoses was 11% (35/309), of which 69% (24/35) were unknown at inclusion (diagnostic yield 8%, 24/298). A second-hit and/or relevant mutational signature was observed in 19/21 (90%) tumors with informative data. ChiCaP diagnoses were more prevalent among patients with retinoblastomas (50%, 6/12) and high-grade astrocytomas (37%, 6/16), and in those with non-cancer related features (23%, 20/88), and ≥2 positive ChiCaP criteria (28%, 22/79). ChiCaP diagnoses were autosomal dominant in 80% (28/35) of patients, yet confirmed de novo in 64% (18/28). The 35 ChiCaP findings resulted in tailored surveillance (86%, 30/35) and treatment recommendations (31%, 11/35).InterpretationOverall, our results demonstrate that systematic phenotyping, combined with genomics-based diagnostics of ChiCaP in children with solid tumors is feasible in large-scale clinical practice and critically guides personalized care in a sizable proportion of patients.
|
|
| 5. |
- Tesi, Bianca, et al.
(författare)
-
Diagnostic yield and clinical impact of germline sequencing in children with CNS and extracranial solid tumors : a nationwide, prospective Swedish study
- 2024
-
Ingår i: The Lancet Regional Health. - : Elsevier. - 2666-7762. ; 39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Childhood cancer predisposition (ChiCaP) syndromes are increasingly recognized as contributing factors to childhood cancer development. Yet, due to variable availability of germline testing, many children with ChiCaP might go undetected today. We report results from the nationwide and prospective ChiCaP study that investigated diagnostic yield and clinical impact of integrating germline whole-genome sequencing (gWGS) with tumor sequencing and systematic phenotyping in children with solid tumors.Methods: gWGS was performed in 309 children at diagnosis of CNS (n = 123, 40%) or extracranial (n = 186, 60%) solid tumors and analyzed for disease-causing variants in 189 known cancer predisposing genes. Tumor sequencing data were available for 74% (227/309) of patients. In addition, a standardized clinical assessment for underlying predisposition was performed in 95% (293/309) of patients.Findings: The prevalence of ChiCaP diagnoses was 11% (35/309), of which 69% (24/35) were unknown at inclusion (diagnostic yield 8%, 24/298). A second-hit and/or relevant mutational signature was observed in 19/21 (90%) tumors with informative data. ChiCaP diagnoses were more prevalent among patients with retinoblastomas (50%, 6/12) and high-grade astrocytomas (37%, 6/16), and in those with non-cancer related features (23%, 20/88), and ≥2 positive ChiCaP criteria (28%, 22/79). ChiCaP diagnoses were autosomal dominant in 80% (28/35) of patients, yet confirmed de novo in 64% (18/28). The 35 ChiCaP findings resulted in tailored surveillance (86%, 30/35) and treatment recommendations (31%, 11/35).Interpretation: Overall, our results demonstrate that systematic phenotyping, combined with genomics-based diagnostics of ChiCaP in children with solid tumors is feasible in large-scale clinical practice and critically guides personalized care in a sizable proportion of patients.Funding: The study was supported by the Swedish Childhood Cancer Fund and the Ministry of Health and Social Affairs.
|
|
