| 1. |
- Axelsson Bjerg, Mette, et al.
(författare)
-
Moderate thermal post-treatment of digestate to improve biomethane production from agricultural- and food waste
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Bioresource Technology Reports. - 2589-014X. ; 27, s. 101887-101887
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility of moderate thermal treatment (70 ◦C for one hour) of digestate in combination with post-digestion targeting residual biomethane potentials from three full-scale biogas plants digesting food waste (FW), agricultural waste (AW) and a mixture of AW and manure (AWM). Dissolved organic carbon (DOC), biomethane production, and digestate quality were investigated. For the study six laboratory-scale continuously stirred tank biogas reactors working as post-digesters, with thermally-treated and non-treated digestate were used. DOC for thermally-treated digestates increased significantly (t-test, p < 0.05); FW-digestate (110–200 %), AW-digestate (24–92 %) and for AWM-digestate (4–73 %). Indexes for corresponding DOC quality showed lower apparent organic molecular weights and decreased aromaticity (with the exception of FW-digestate). Thermal treatment of digestate improved the biomethane production during post-digestion by 21–22 % (FW-digestate) and 9 % (AW-digestate). For AMW-digestate no clear positive effect was observed, most likely due to biogas plant operational process disturbances.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Nordell, Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
Thermal post-treatment of digestate in order to increase biogas production with simultaneous pasteurization
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Biotechnology. - : Elsevier. - 0168-1656 .- 1873-4863. ; :344, s. 32-39
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Biogas production by anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic wastes is important for the transition to fossil free fuelsin both the transport sector, industries and shipping. The aim of this study was to target the residual organicmatter in the outgoing residue from the AD process, so called digestate, with different thermal treatmentmethods in order to improve digestate degradability and biogas potential upon post-digestion. The thermaltreatment was performed at 55 ◦C in 24 h, 70 ◦C in 1 h and by thermal hydrolysis process (THP; 165 ◦C, 8 bar in0.33 h), and were carefully selected to offer a simultaneous possibility for pasteurization of the digestate accordingto the regulations in Sweden. Digestates from ten full-scale biogas plants were collected, with differentsubstrate profiles including wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), food waste digestion, agriculture digestion andmanure digestion. The results showed that all thermal treatment methods caused increased dissolved organiccarbon concentration (DOC). Four of the thermal treated digestates with the highest increase in DOC weresubsequently tested for the bio-methane potential. Thermal treatments at 70 ◦C and THP, respectively, resulted inthe highest increase in bio-methane potentials, with an increase of 15–39% for one WWTP, 38 – 40% fordigestate from an agriculture digestion plant and 20 – 22% for digestate from a co-digestion plant treating foodwaste. Interestingly, the bio-methane potential from digestate treated with the energy-intense THP method, didnot show any significant difference compared to thermal treatment at 70 ◦C for 1 h. The outcomes of this studysuggest that placing a pasteurization unit between a main digester and a post digester, when applying two-stepdigestion allows for a combined pasteurization and increased biogas production.
|
|
| 4. |
- Bastviken, David, Professor, 1971-, et al.
(författare)
-
Measuring greenhouse gas fluxes : what methods do we have versus what methods do we need?
- 2022
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Appropriate methods to measure greenhouse gas (GHG) fluxes are critical for our ability to detect fluxes, understand regulation, make adequate priorities for climate change mitigation efforts, and verify that these efforts are effective. Ideally, we need reliable, accessible, and affordable measurements at relevant scales. We surveyed present GHG flux measurement methods, identified from an analysis of >11000 scientific publications and a questionnaire to sector professionals and analysed method pros and cons versus needs for novel methodology. While existing methods are well-suited for addressing certain questions, this presentation presents fundamental limitations relative to GHG flux measurement needs for verifiable and transparent action to mitigate many types of emissions. Cost and non-academic accessibility are key aspects, along with fundamental measurement performance. These method limitations contribute to the difficulties in verifying GHG mitigation efforts for transparency and accountability under the Paris agreement. Resolving this mismatch between method capacity and societal needs is urgently needed for effective climate mitigation. This type of methodological mismatch is common but seems to get high priority in other knowledge domains. The obvious need to prioritize development of accurate diagnosis methods for effective treatments in healthcare is one example. This presentation provides guidance regarding the need to prioritize the development of novel GHG flux measurement methods.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
