| 1. |
- Niemi, MEK, et al.
(författare)
-
- 2021
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 2. |
- Jespersen, Nathan, et al.
(författare)
-
Systematic identification of recognition motifs for the hub protein LC8
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Life Science Alliance. - : Life Science Alliance, LLC. - 2575-1077. ; 2:4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Hub proteins participate in cellular regulation by dynamic binding of multiple proteins within interaction networks. The hub protein LC8 reversibly interacts with more than 100 partners through a flexible pocket at its dimer interface. To explore the diversity of the LC8 partner pool, we screened for LC8 binding partners using a proteomic phage display library composed of peptides from the human proteome, which had no bias toward a known LC8 motif. Of the identified hits, we validated binding of 29 peptides using isothermal titration calorimetry. Of the 29 peptides, 19 were entirely novel, and all had the canonical TQT motif anchor. A striking observation is that numerous peptides containing the TQT anchor do not bind LC8, indicating that residues outside of the anchor facilitate LC8 interactions. Using both LC8-binding and nonbinding peptides containing the motif anchor, we developed the "LC8Pred" algorithm that identifies critical residues flanking the anchor and parses random sequences to predict LC8-binding motifs with similar to 78% accuracy. Our findings significantly expand the scope of the LC8 hub interactome.
|
|
| 3. |
- Jönsson, Bengt, et al.
(författare)
-
Priorities for health Economic Methodological Research: Results of an expert consultation
- 2017
-
Ingår i: International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care. - : Cambridge University Press (CUP): HSS Journals. - 1471-6348 .- 0266-4623. ; 33:6, s. 609-619
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The importance of economic evaluation in decision making is growing with increasing budgetary pressures on health systems. Diverse economic evidence is available for a range of interventions across national contexts within Europe, but little attention has been given to identifying evidence gaps that, if filled, could contribute to more efficient allocation of resources. One objective of the Research Agenda for Health Economic Evaluation project is to determine the most important methodological evidence gaps for the ten highest burden conditions in the European Union (EU), and to suggest ways of filling these gaps. Methods: The highest burden conditions in the EU by Disability Adjusted Life Years were determined using the Global Burden of Disease study. Clinical interventions were identified for each condition based on published guidelines, and economic evaluations indexed in MEDLINE were mapped to each intervention. A panel of public health and health economics experts discussed the evidence during a workshop and identified evidence gaps. Results: The literature analysis contributed to identifying cross-cutting methodological and technical issues, which were considered by the expert panel to derive methodological research priorities. Conclusions: The panel suggests a research agenda for health economics which incorporates the use of real-world evidence in the assessment of new and existing interventions; increased understanding of cost-effectiveness according to patient characteristics beyond the -omics approach to inform both investment and disinvestment decisions; methods for assessment of complex interventions; improved cross-talk between economic evaluations from health and other sectors; early health technology assessment; and standardized, transferable approaches to economic modeling. © Cambridge University Press 2017.
|
|
| 4. |
- Kanai, M, et al.
(författare)
-
- 2023
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
