| 1. |
- Dema, Emily, et al.
(författare)
-
How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect access to condoms, chlamydia and HIV testing, and cervical cancer screening at a population level in Britain? (Natsal-COVID)
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Sexually Transmitted Infections. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1368-4973 .- 1472-3263. ; 99:4, s. 261-267
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives: To investigate how differential access to key interventions to reduce STIs, HIV and their sequelae changed during the COVID-19 pandemic.Methods: British participants (18-59 years) completed a cross-sectional web survey 1 year (March-April 2021) after the initial lockdown in Britain. Quota-based sampling and weighting resulted in a quasi-representative population sample. We compared Natsal-COVID data with Natsal-3, a household-based probability sample cross-sectional survey (16-74 years) conducted in 2010-2012. Reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic and uptake of chlamydia testing/HIV testing/cervical cancer screening were analysed among sexually experienced participants (18-44 years) (n=3869, Natsal-COVID; n=8551, Natsal-3). ORs adjusted for age and other potential confounders describe associations with demographic and behavioural factors.Results: In 2021, 6.9% of women and 16.2% of men reported unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic. This was more likely among participants: aged 18-24 years, of black or black British ethnicity, and reporting same-sex sex (past 5 years) or one or more new relationships (past year). Chlamydia and HIV testing were more commonly reported by younger participants, those reporting condomless sex with new sexual partners and men reporting same-sex partners; a very similar distribution to 10 years previously (Natsal-3). However, there were differences during the pandemic, including stronger associations with chlamydia testing for men reporting same-sex partners; with HIV testing for women reporting new sexual partners and with cervical screening among smokers.Conclusions: Our study suggests differential access to key primary and secondary STI/HIV prevention interventions continued during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there was not strong evidence that differential access has changed during the pandemic when compared with 2010-2012. While the pandemic might not have exacerbated inequalities in access to primary and secondary prevention, it is clear that large inequalities persisted, typically among those at greatest STI/HIV risk.
|
|
| 2. |
- Dema, Emily, et al.
(författare)
-
How did the COVID-19 pandemic affect unmet need for condoms at a population level? (Natsal-COVID)
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Sexually Transmitted Infections. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1368-4973 .- 1472-3263. ; 98:Suppl. 1, s. A42-A42
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: Use of condoms to prevent STIs/HIV and unplanned pregnancy remains important during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, it is unknown whether the pandemic affected condom access and which population groups were most impacted.Methods: 6658 participants (18-59y) completed a cross-sectional web survey one-year after the initial British lockdown from 23 March 2020. Quota-based sampling and weighting resulted in a sample that was quasi-representative of the British population. We report the prevalence of unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic among sexually-experienced participants aged 18-44 years (n=2869). Adjusted odds ratios (AOR) quantify associations with demographic and behavioural factors.Results: Overall, 6.9% of women and 16.2% of men reported unmet need for condoms in the past year because of the pandemic. This was more likely to be reported by participants who: were aged 18-24 years vs. 35-44 (AOR: men 2.25 [95%CI:1.26-4.01], women 2.95[1.42-6.16]); were Black or Black British vs. White (men 2.86 [1.45-5.66], women 1.93 [1.03-8.30]); reported same-sex sex vs. not (past five years; men 2.85 [1.68-4.86], women 5.00 [2.48-10.08]); or ≥1 new relationships vs. not (past year, men 5.85 [3.55-9.66], women 6.38 [3.24-12.59]). Men, but not women, reporting STI-related service use (past year) were more likely to report unmet need for condoms compared to men that did not report service use (3.83 [2.18-6.71]).Discussion: Unmet need for condoms because of the pandemic was more likely to be reported by populations at higher risk of adverse sexual health outcomes, including STI/HIV transmission. Improved access to free/low-cost condoms is crucial for all.
|
|
| 3. |
- Ratna, Natasha, et al.
(författare)
-
Ethnic variations in sexual risk behaviour, sexual health service use and unmet need during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic : an analysis of population-based survey and surveillance data
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Sexually Transmitted Infections. - : BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. - 1368-4973 .- 1472-3263. ; 98:Suppl. 1, s. A8-A9
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Introduction: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, STIs disproportionately affected some Black communities. We examined ethnic inequalities in sexual health during the pandemic.Methods: Analyses were restricted to England residents aged 18–59. We included 5,240 sexually-experienced participants from Natsal-COVID survey Wave 2 (quasi-representative web panel survey) reporting one-year outcomes from March 2020-April 2021. We estimated weighted proportions and adjusted odds ratios (AORs) between ethnicity and sexual risk behaviour (condomless sex with new partner on first occasion), sexual health service (SHS) use, and unmet need (trying but failing to access SHS). Using GUMCAD national surveillance data from before (March 2019-March 2020) and during (March 2020-March 2021) the pandemic, we compared proportional differences in rates of STI tests and diagnoses by ethnicity.Results: Compared to Natsal-COVID participants of White ethnicity, sexual risk behaviour (8%) was higher among participants of Mixed/Other (22%, AOR:2.26 [95% CI 1.08-4.73]) and Asian (15%, 1.58 [1.07-2.35]); SHS use (5%) was higher in Black (20%, 3.04 [1.75-5.28]) and Mixed/Other (20%, 2.64 [1.35-5.14]); and unmet need (2%) was higher in Black (11%, 5.01 [2.26-11.09]) and Asian (5%, 2.33 [1.11-4.90]) ethnicity. In GUMCAD, among people attending SHS, we observed similar reductions of around 50% in testing and diagnoses during the pandemic across different ethnic groups, although the greatest reduction was in people of Asian ethnicity (56% and 52% respectively).Discussion: Two independent national data sources showed sexual health inequalities persisted during the first year of the pandemic with evidence of more unmet need among minority ethnicities, but further work is needed to assess whether these worsened.
|
|
