| 1. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 2. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 3. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 4. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t
|
|
| 7. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 8. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 9. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 10. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 11. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 12. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2010
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 13. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 14. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 15. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 16. |
- Aad, G., et al.
(författare)
-
- 2011
-
swepub:Mat__t (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 17. |
- Abazov, V. M., et al.
(författare)
-
The upgraded DO detector
- 2006
-
Ingår i: Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A. - : Elsevier BV. - 0168-9002 .- 1872-9576. ; 565:2, s. 463-537
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The DO experiment enjoyed a very successful data-collection run at the Fermilab Tevatron collider between 1992 and 1996. Since then, the detector has been upgraded to take advantage of improvements to the Tevatron and to enhance its physics capabilities. We describe the new elements of the detector, including the silicon microstrip tracker, central fiber tracker, solenoidal magnet, preshower detectors, forward muon detector, and forward proton detector. The uranium/liquid -argon calorimeters and central muon detector, remaining from Run 1, are discussed briefly. We also present the associated electronics, triggering, and data acquisition systems, along with the design and implementation of software specific to DO.
|
|
| 18. |
- Martens, Marvin, et al.
(författare)
-
ELIXIR and Toxicology : a community in development
- 2021
-
Ingår i: F1000 Research. - : F1000 Research Ltd. - 2046-1402. ; 10, s. 1129-1129
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Toxicology has been an active research field for many decades, with academic, industrial and government involvement. Modern omics and computational approaches are changing the field, from merely disease-specific observational models into target-specific predictive models. Traditionally, toxicology has strong links with other fields such as biology, chemistry, pharmacology and medicine. With the rise of synthetic and new engineered materials, alongside ongoing prioritisation needs in chemical risk assessment for existing chemicals, early predictive evaluations are becoming of utmost importance to both scientific and regulatory purposes. ELIXIR is an intergovernmental organisation that brings together life science resources from across Europe. To coordinate the linkage of various life science efforts around modern predictive toxicology, the establishment of a new ELIXIR Community is seen as instrumental. In the past few years, joint efforts, building on incidental overlap, have been piloted in the context of ELIXIR. For example, the EU-ToxRisk, diXa, HeCaToS, transQST, and the nanotoxicology community have worked with the ELIXIR TeSS, Bioschemas, and Compute Platforms and activities. In 2018, a core group of interested parties wrote a proposal, outlining a sketch of what this new ELIXIR Toxicology Community would look like. A recent workshop (held September 30th to October 1st, 2020) extended this into an ELIXIR Toxicology roadmap and a shortlist of limited investment-high gain collaborations to give body to this new community. This Whitepaper outlines the results of these efforts and defines our vision of the ELIXIR Toxicology Community and how it complements other ELIXIR activities.
|
|
| 19. |
|
|
| 20. |
- Escher, Sylvia E., et al.
(författare)
-
Integrate mechanistic evidence from new approach methodologies (NAMs) into a read-across assessment to characterise trends in shared mode of action
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Toxicology in Vitro. - : Elsevier. - 0887-2333 .- 1879-3177. ; 79
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Read-across approaches often remain inconclusive as they do not provide sufficient evidence on a common mode of action across the category members. This read-across case study on thirteen, structurally similar, branched aliphatic carboxylic acids investigates the concept of using human-based new approach methods, such as in vitro and in silico models, to demonstrate biological similarity.Five out of the thirteen analogues have preclinical in vivo studies. Three out of them induced lipid accumulation or hypertrophy in preclinical studies with repeated exposure, which leads to the read-across hypothesis that the analogues can potentially induce hepatic steatosis.To confirm the selection of analogues, the expression patterns of the induced differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analysed in a human liver model. With increasing dose, the expression pattern within the tested analogues got more similar, which serves as a first indication of a common mode of action and suggests differences in the potency of the analogues.Hepatic steatosis is a well-known adverse outcome, for which over 55 adverse outcome pathways have been identified. The resulting adverse outcome pathway (AOP) network, comprised a total 43 MIEs/KEs and enabled the design of an in vitro testing battery. From the AOP network, ten MIEs, early and late KEs were tested to systematically investigate a common mode of action among the grouped compounds.The targeted testing of AOP specific MIE/KEs shows that biological activity in the category decreases with side chain length. A similar trend was evident in measuring liver alterations in zebra fish embryos. However, activation of single MIEs or early KEs at in vivo relevant doses did not necessarily progress to the late KE “lipid accumulation”. KEs not related to the read-across hypothesis, testing for example general mitochondrial stress responses in liver cells, showed no trend or biological similarity.Testing scope is a key issue in the design of in vitro test batteries. The Dempster-Shafer decision theory predicted those analogues with in vivo reference data correctly using one human liver model or the CALUX reporter assays.The case study shows that the read-across hypothesis is the key element to designing the testing strategy. In the case of a good mechanistic understanding, an AOP facilitates the selection of reliable human in vitro models to demonstrate a common mode of action. Testing DEGs, MIEs and early KEs served to show biological similarity, whereas the late KEs become important for confirmation, as progression from MIEs to AO is not always guaranteed.
|
|
| 21. |
|
|
