| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Dikken, J. L., et al.
(författare)
-
Differences in outcomes of oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery across Europe
- 2013
-
Ingår i: British Journal of Surgery. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 1365-2168 .- 0007-1323. ; 100:1, s. 83-94
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In several European countries, centralization of oesophagogastric cancer surgery has been realized and clinical audits initiated. The present study was designed to evaluate differences in resection rates, outcomes and annual hospital volumes between these countries, and to analyse the relationship between hospital volume and outcomes. Methods: National data were obtained from cancer registries or clinical audits in the Netherlands, Sweden, Denmark and England. Differences in outcomes were analysed between countries and between hospital volume categories, adjusting for available case-mix factors. Results: Between 2004 and 2009, 10 854 oesophagectomies and 9010 gastrectomies were registered. Resection rates in England were 18.2 and 21.6 per cent for oesophageal and gastric cancer respectively, compared with 28.529.9 and 41.441.9 per cent in the Netherlands and Denmark (P < 0.001). The adjusted 30-day mortality rate after oesophagectomy was lowest in Sweden (1.9 per cent). After gastrectomy, the adjusted 30-day mortality rate was significantly higher in the Netherlands (6.9 per cent) than in Sweden (3.5 per cent; P = 0.017) and Denmark (4.3 per cent; P = 0.029). Increasing hospital volume was associated with a lower 30-day mortality rate after oesophagectomy (odds ratio 0.55 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.42 to 0.72) for at least 41 versus 110 procedures per year) and gastrectomy (odds ratio 0.64 (0.41 to 0.99) for at least 21 versus 110 procedures per year). Conclusion: Hospitals performing larger numbers of oesophagogastric cancer resections had a lower 30-day mortality rate. Differences in outcomes between several European countries could not be explained by differences in hospital volumes. To understand these differences in outcomes and resection rates, with reliable case-mix adjustments, a uniform European upper gastrointestinal cancer audit with recording of standardized data is warranted. Copyright (c) 2012 British Journal of Surgery Society Ltd. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
|
|
| 3. |
- Busweiler, L A D, et al.
(författare)
-
International benchmarking in oesophageal and gastric cancer surgery
- 2019
-
Ingår i: BJS Open. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2474-9842. ; 3:1, s. 62-73
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Benchmarking on an international level might lead to improved outcomes at a national level. The aim of this study was to compare treatment and surgical outcome data from the Swedish National Register for Oesophageal and Gastric Cancer (NREV) and the Dutch Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer Audit (DUCA).Methods: All patients with primary oesophageal or gastric cancer who underwent a resection and were registered in NREV or DUCA between 2012 and 2014 were included. Differences in 30-day mortality were analysed using case mix-adjusted multivariable logistic regression.Results: In total, 4439 patients underwent oesophagectomy (2509 patients) or gastrectomy (1930 patients). Estimated resection rates were comparable. Swedish patients were older but had less advanced disease and less co-morbidity than Dutch patients. Neoadjuvant treatment rates were lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands, both for patients who underwent oesophagectomy (68·6 versus 90·0 per cent respectively; P < 0·001) and for those having gastrectomy (38·3 versus 56·6 per cent; P < 0·001). In Sweden, transthoracic oesophagectomy was performed in 94·7 per cent of patients, whereas in the Netherlands, a transhiatal approach was undertaken in 35·8 per cent. Higher annual procedural volumes per hospital were observed in the Netherlands. Adjusted 30-day and/or in-hospital mortality after gastrectomy was statistically significantly lower in Sweden than in the Netherlands (odds ratio 0·53, 95 per cent c.i. 0·29 to 0·95).Conclusion: For oesophageal and gastric cancer, there are differences in patient, tumour and treatment characteristics between Sweden and the Netherlands. Postoperative mortality in patients with gastric cancer was lower in Sweden.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Caspers, Irene A., et al.
(författare)
-
The impact of sex on treatment and outcome in relation to histological subtype in patients with resectable gastric cancer : Results from the randomized CRITICS trial
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0022-4790 .- 1096-9098. ; 129:4, s. 734-744
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and ObjectiveThis study aims to investigate the impact of sex on outcome measures stratified by histological subtype in patients with resectable gastric cancer (GC).MethodsA post-hoc analysis of the CRITICS-trial, in which patients with resectable GC were treated with perioperative therapy, was performed. Histopathological characteristics and survival were evaluated for males and females stratified for histological subtype (intestinal/diffuse). Additionally, therapy-related toxicity and compliance were compared.ResultsData from 781 patients (523 males) were available for analyses. Female sex was associated with a distal tumor localization in intestinal (p = 0.014) and diffuse tumors (p < 0.001), and younger age in diffuse GC (p = 0.035). In diffuse GC, tumor-positive resection margins were also more common in females than males (21% vs. 10%; p = 0.020), specifically at the duodenal margin. During preoperative chemotherapy, severe toxicity occurred in 327 (63%) males and 184 (71%) females (p = 0.015). Notwithstanding this, relative dose intensities were not significantly different between sexes.ConclusionsPositive distal margin rates were higher in females with diffuse GC, predominantly at the duodenal site. Females also experience more toxicity, but this neither impacts dose intensities nor surgical resection rates. Clinicians should be aware of these different surgical outcomes when treating males and females with GC.
|
|
| 6. |
- Caspers, I. A., et al.
(författare)
-
Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on the histopathological classification of gastric cancer
- 2024
-
Ingår i: Gastric Cancer. - : Springer. - 1436-3291 .- 1436-3305. ; 27, s. 102-109
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: In the era of individualized gastric cancer (GC) treatment, accurate determination of histological subtype becomes increasingly relevant. As yet, it is unclear whether preoperative chemotherapy may affect the histological subtype. The aim of this study was to assess concordance in histological subtype between pretreatment biopsies and surgical resection specimens before and after the introduction of perioperative treatment.Methods: Histological subtype was centrally determined in paired GC biopsies and surgical resection specimens of patients treated with either surgery alone (SA) in the Dutch D1/D2 study or with preoperative chemotherapy (CT) in the CRITICS trial. The histological subtype as determined in the resection specimen was considered the gold standard. Concordance rates and sensitivity and specificity of intestinal, diffuse, mixed, and "other" subtypes of GC were analyzed.Results: In total, 105 and 515 pairs of GC biopsies and resection specimens of patients treated in the SA and CT cohorts, respectively, were included. Overall concordance in the histological subtype was 72% in the SA and 74% in the CT cohort and substantially higher in the diffuse subtype (83% and 86%) compared to the intestinal (70% and 74%), mixed (21% and 33%) and "other" subtypes (54% and 54%). In the SA cohort, sensitivities and specificities were 0.88 and 0.71 in the intestinal, 0.67 and 0.93 in the diffuse, 0.20 and 0.98 in the mixed, and 0.50 and 0.93 in the "other" subtypes, respectively.Conclusion: Our results suggest that accurate determination of histological subtype on gastric cancer biopsies is suboptimal but that the impact of preoperative chemotherapy on histological subtype is negligible.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
