| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Hansson, Bengt, et al.
(author)
-
Increase of genetic variation over time in a recently founded population of great reed warblers (Acrocephalus arundinaceus) revealed by microsatellites and DNA fingerprinting
- 2000
-
In: Molecular Ecology. - : Wiley. - 0962-1083 .- 1365-294X. ; 9:10, s. 1529-1538
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Genetic similarity within pairs of individuals was examined using both 10 polymorphic microsatellite loci and multi-locus DNA fingerprinting profiles in a semi-isolated population of great reed warblers at Lake Kvismaren, south Central Sweden, in 1987-1993. The population was founded by a few individuals in 1978, followed by a gradual increase in numbers until 1988, since when the population has remained relatively stable with about 60 breeding birds. We have previously found that high genetic similarity between pairmates in the population during the early part of the study period reduced egg hatching success, and hence reproductive success. The measures of pairwise genetic similarity, microsatellite allele sharing and DNA fingerprinting band sharing, were highly correlated with pedigree-based relatedness. Both microsatellite and DNA fingerprinting similarities between pair-mates declined significantly over the study period, and the pattern was most pronounced in the DNA fingerprinting data. Analyses restricted to the microsatellite data showed that the average annual microsatellite similarity between pairwise combinations of individuals, as well as individual homozygosity in males, declined significantly over the study period, and that several immigrants carrying novel alleles entered the population during the study. Hence, the temporal decline in genetic similarity of mates in the population is probably a consequence of increased immigration, facilitated by the recent expansion of the species in the region. These results suggest that the population has now recovered genetically, or is in the process of recovering, from a recent founder event.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Wang, ZH, et al.
(author)
-
Cervical mucus antibodies against human papillomavirus type 16, 18, and 33 capsids in relation to presence of viral DNA
- 1996
-
In: Journal of clinical microbiology. - : American Society for Microbiology. - 0095-1137 .- 1098-660X. ; 34:12, s. 3056-3062
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- To investigate whether cervical mucus antibodies against human papillomavirus (HPV) capsids are associated with the detection of HPV DNA or HPV-related cytological diagnoses, 611 samples of cervical secretions from 359 women referred to a colposcopy clinic were tested by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for the presence of immunoglobulin A (IgA) antibodies against HPV capsids of HPV type 16, 18, or 33 and for the presence of cervical HPV DNA by PCR. Among subjects with at least one cervical sample positive for HPV type 16 (HPV-16) DNA, 28.1% also had at least one HPV-16 IgA-positive cervical sample (odds ratio [OR] = 2.9; P = 0.0003). IgA to HPV-18 was also more common among HPV-18 DNA-positive subjects (OR = 3.1; P = 0.0325) and IgA to HPV-33 was more common among HPV-33 DNA-positive subjects (OR = 4.2; P = 0.0023). Cervical IgA antibodies to HPV-16 were also more common among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, particularly among patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (P < 0.0005). The data indicate that an HPV type-restricted IgA antibody response against HPV capsids is detectable in cervical mucus and is associated with a concomitant cervical HPV infection.
|
|
| 10. |
- Went, M, et al.
(author)
-
Author Correction: Identification of multiple risk loci and regulatory mechanisms influencing susceptibility to multiple myeloma
- 2019
-
In: Nature communications. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 2041-1723. ; 10:1, s. 213-
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The original version of this Article contained an error in the spelling of a member of the PRACTICAL Consortium, Manuela Gago-Dominguez, which was incorrectly given as Manuela Gago Dominguez. This has now been corrected in both the PDF and HTML versions of the Article. Furthermore, in the original HTML version of this Article, the order of authors within the author list was incorrect. The PRACTICAL consortium was incorrectly listed after Richard S. Houlston and should have been listed after Nora Pashayan. This error has been corrected in the HTML version of the Article; the PDF version was correct at the time of publication.
|
|
