SwePub - sökning: WFRF:(Kelly Brian)

Numrering	Referens	Omslagsbild	Hitta
1.	Ågerfalk, Pär, et al. (författare) Modularization constructs in method engineering : towards common ground? 2007 Ingår i: Situational method engineering. - Berlin : Springer. - 9780387739465 ; , s. 359-368 Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract Although the Method Engineering (ME) research community has reached considerable maturity, it has not yet been able to agree on the granularity and definition of the configurable parts of methods. This state of affairs is causing unnecessary confusion, especially with an ever increasing number of people contributing to ME research. There are several competing notions around, most significantly ‘method fragments’ and ‘method chunks’, but also ‘method components’ and ‘process components’ are used in some quarters and have also been widely published. Sometimes these terms are used interchangeably, but there appears to be important semantic and pragmatic differences. If the differences are unimportant, we should be able to come to an agreement on what construct to promote. Alternatively, the different constructs may serve different purposes and there is a need for them to coexist. If this is the case, it should be possible to pinpoint exactly how they are related and which are useful in what contexts. This panel is a step towards finding common ground in this area, which arguably is at the very core of ME.

Ågerfalk, Pär, et al. (författare)
Modularization constructs in method engineering : towards common ground?
2007
Ingår i: Situational method engineering. - Berlin : Springer. - 9780387739465 ; , s. 359-368
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- Although the Method Engineering (ME) research community has reached considerable maturity, it has not yet been able to agree on the granularity and definition of the configurable parts of methods. This state of affairs is causing unnecessary confusion, especially with an ever increasing number of people contributing to ME research. There are several competing notions around, most significantly ‘method fragments’ and ‘method chunks’, but also ‘method components’ and ‘process components’ are used in some quarters and have also been widely published. Sometimes these terms are used interchangeably, but there appears to be important semantic and pragmatic differences. If the differences are unimportant, we should be able to come to an agreement on what construct to promote. Alternatively, the different constructs may serve different purposes and there is a need for them to coexist. If this is the case, it should be possible to pinpoint exactly how they are related and which are useful in what contexts. This panel is a step towards finding common ground in this area, which arguably is at the very core of ME.

Träfflista för sökning "WFRF:(Kelly Brian) srt2:(2007-2009)"