SwePub - sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-14...

Numrering	Referens	Omslagsbild	Hitta
1.	Stolt, Minna, et al. (författare) Measuring Quality of Care : A Rasch Validity Analysis of the Good Nursing Care Scale 2019 Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Care Quality. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1057-3631 .- 1550-5065. ; 34:4, s. E1-E6 Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract BACKGROUND: Patient-centeredness is emphasized in both health policies and practice, calling for reliable instruments for the evaluation of the quality of nursing care. PURPOSE: The purpose was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) in a sample of surgical patients and nurses. METHODS: An explorative cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected with the 40-item GNCS from surgical patients (n = 476) and nurses (n = 167) in Finland. The data were analyzed with Rasch analysis. RESULTS: The GNCS provided evidence of unidimensionality with acceptable goodness-of-fit to the Rasch model in both samples. Person-separation validity was acceptable. Person misfit was reasonable. The Rasch-equivalent Cronbach alpha was 0.81 (patient data) and 0.88 (nurse data). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support that the GNCS is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used in measuring the quality of nursing care, from the perspective of both patients and nurses.

Stolt, Minna, et al. (författare)
Measuring Quality of Care : A Rasch Validity Analysis of the Good Nursing Care Scale
2019
Ingår i: Journal of Nursing Care Quality. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 1057-3631 .- 1550-5065. ; 34:4, s. E1-E6
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Patient-centeredness is emphasized in both health policies and practice, calling for reliable instruments for the evaluation of the quality of nursing care. PURPOSE: The purpose was to analyze the psychometric properties of the Good Nursing Care Scale (GNCS) in a sample of surgical patients and nurses. METHODS: An explorative cross-sectional study design was used. Data were collected with the 40-item GNCS from surgical patients (n = 476) and nurses (n = 167) in Finland. The data were analyzed with Rasch analysis. RESULTS: The GNCS provided evidence of unidimensionality with acceptable goodness-of-fit to the Rasch model in both samples. Person-separation validity was acceptable. Person misfit was reasonable. The Rasch-equivalent Cronbach alpha was 0.81 (patient data) and 0.88 (nurse data). CONCLUSIONS: The findings support that the GNCS is a psychometrically sound instrument that can be used in measuring the quality of nursing care, from the perspective of both patients and nurses.

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:mau-14654" "