SwePub - sökning: id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:oru-32...

Numrering	Referens	Omslagsbild	Hitta
1.	Salzmann-Erikson, Martin (författare) IMPAD-22 : A checklist for authors of qualitative nursing research manuscripts 2013 Ingår i: Nurse Education Today. - : Elsevier BV. - 0260-6917 .- 1532-2793. ; 33:11, s. 1295-1300 Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract Objective: The aim of this paper is to develop a checklist for authors preparing qualitative nursing research manuscripts, specifically focusing on the method section.Design: Literature review.Data Sources: 15 articles were purposefully selected from three different nursing journals.Review Methods: Evans' four step process was used to synthesize the method sections of the included articles. Results: Four main categories were identified 1) Ingress and Methodology, 2) Participants, 3) Approval, and 4) Data: Collection and Management. Based on the categories and sub-categories, a 22-item checklist was developed.Discussion and Conclusions: Earlier guidelines for formal reporting were developed for qualitative research in general. The main advantage and contribution of IMPAD is that it provides a 22-item checklist specifically aimed towards the method section, and furthermore, it was developed specifically for authors within the field of nursing research. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Salzmann-Erikson, Martin (författare)
IMPAD-22 : A checklist for authors of qualitative nursing research manuscripts
2013
Ingår i: Nurse Education Today. - : Elsevier BV. - 0260-6917 .- 1532-2793. ; 33:11, s. 1295-1300
Forskningsöversikt (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The aim of this paper is to develop a checklist for authors preparing qualitative nursing research manuscripts, specifically focusing on the method section.Design: Literature review.Data Sources: 15 articles were purposefully selected from three different nursing journals.Review Methods: Evans' four step process was used to synthesize the method sections of the included articles. Results: Four main categories were identified 1) Ingress and Methodology, 2) Participants, 3) Approval, and 4) Data: Collection and Management. Based on the categories and sub-categories, a 22-item checklist was developed.Discussion and Conclusions: Earlier guidelines for formal reporting were developed for qualitative research in general. The main advantage and contribution of IMPAD is that it provides a 22-item checklist specifically aimed towards the method section, and furthermore, it was developed specifically for authors within the field of nursing research. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:DiVA.org:oru-32624" "