SwePub - search: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalme...

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:685dd455-5217-4fbd-a279-5211a4b70261" "

Search: id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:685dd455-5217-4fbd-a279-5211a4b70261"

Sort/group result

Sort by: Hits per page:

Enumeration	Reference	Cover	Find
1.	Hansson, Julia, 1978, et al. (author) Future bioenergy trade in the EU: modelling trading options from a cost-effectiveness perspective 2009 In: Journal of Cleaner Production. - : Elsevier BV. - 0959-6526. ; 17:1, s. 27-36 Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract The purpose of this paper is to analyse under what conditions, with respect to CO2 emission-reduction and biofuels-for-transport targets, the trading in the EU of CO2 credits and solid and/or liquid biofuels is cost-effective from the perspective of an optimisation energy systems model. We use the PEEP model covering the EU27 (except Bulgaria, Malta, and Cyprus) to generate insights about the cost-effectiveness of different options under different policy scenarios. Trade in CO2 credits is a cost-effective option, in all relevant policy scenarios. Trade in some biofuels (mainly from Central and Eastern European countries to the EU15) is cost-effective in all assessed scenarios. In the case of CO2 targets (whether national or at the EU level) there is trade in solid biofuels. When biofuels-for-transport targets are also implemented, trading both solid and liquid biofuels is cost-effective.

Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka

Träfflista för sökning "id:"swepub:oai:research.chalmers.se:685dd455-5217-4fbd-a279-5211a4b70261" "