| 11. |
- Bolejko, Anetta, et al.
(author)
-
Facilitators for and barriers to radiography research in public healthcare in Nordic countries
- 2022
-
In: Radiography. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-8174. ; 28:1, s. 88-94
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Introduction:It has been suggested that the future of diagnostic imaging relies on engagement inresearch and evidence-based practice. This implies a role transition from a clinical radiographer to aclinical radiographer-researcher. Clinical radiographers’stimuli for engaging in research in Nordiccountries are unknown. This study aimed to address this gap.Methods:Cross-sectional data collection via an online questionnaire on facilitators for and barriers toparticipation in radiography research was carried out among 507 clinical radiographers in publichealthcare in the Nordic countries: Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden.Results:Support from colleagues (odds ratio [OR] 2.62) and other professionals (OR 2.74), and self-esteem in research skills (OR2.21), were facilitators for radiography research. Lack of knowledgeand skills to conduct research (OR 2.48) was revealed to hinder radiographers’participation in research.The absence of a radiography research culture in the workplace explained non-participation in research(OR 1.75).Conclusion:This study revealed significant factors for clinical radiographers’participation in research.Implications for practice:A strategy for establishing a radiography research culture in healthcare isproposed that is novel for the context. Management support for knowledge development and activityleading to inter-professional research projects across knowledgefields, provision of a radiographyresearch lead and acknowledgement of radiography research among colleagues signify the establishmentof the culture. These prerequisites might provide a paradigm change towards not only the symbiosis of aclinical radiographer and an autonomous researcher but also a partner who adds radiography research toevidence-based practice in diagnostic imaging.
|
|
| 12. |
- Bolejko, Anetta, et al.
(author)
-
Meeting Patient Information Needs Before Magnetic Resonance Imaging : Development and Evaluation of an Information Booklet
- 2008
-
In: Journal of Radiology Nursing. - : Elsevier BV. - 1546-0843. ; 27:3, s. 96-102
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim was to develop and evaluate a preparatory information booklet for adult patients undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The booklet was developed based on pertinent literature and clinical experience. After ethical approval, it was then evaluated qualitatively in 10 people who had received the booklet before their first ever MRI scan. All patients expressed the need for written preparatory information and seven had experienced prescan anxiety and discomfort. Participants found the booklet informative and easily understood, and expressed appreciation related to procedural, behavioral, and sensory information. A few minor misunderstandings were revealed. The impressions by previously MRI-naive participants in this study indicate that the information booklet was successful in providing procedural, behavioral, and sensory information. Minor booklet modifications should provide means to circumvent current misunderstandings. The process used to develop and evaluate the information booklet for this study illustrates an easily implemented strategy to meet patients' needs for preparatory information in clinical practice.
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
- Bolejko, Anetta, et al.
(author)
-
Prevalence, Long-term Development, and Predictors of Psychosocial Consequences of False-Positive Mammography among Women Attending Population-Based Screening
- 2015
-
In: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention. - : American Association for Cancer Research. - 1055-9965 .- 1538-7755. ; 24:9, s. 1388-1397
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Cancer screening aims to detect cancer at an asymptomatic stage, although side effects from screening also occur. We investigated the prevalence, longitudinal development, and predictors of psychosocial consequences of false-positive breast cancer screening. METHODS: Three hundred ninety-nine women with false-positive screening mammography responded to the Consequences of Screening-Breast Cancer (COS-BC) questionnaire immediately after a negative diagnosis (free from breast cancer) following recall examination(s) (baseline), and 6 and 12 months later. Age-matched controls (n = 499) with a negative mammogram responded to the COS-BC at the same occasions. Five COS-BC scales (Sense of dejection, Anxiety, Behavioral, Sleep, and Existential values) were used as outcome measures. RESULTS: Women with false-positive mammography had consistently higher prevalence of all five consequences compared with controls (P < 0.001). The prevalences decreased between baseline and 6 months (P < 0.001) but were stable between 6 and 12 months (P ≥ 0.136). Early recall profoundly predicted long-term consequences for all five outcomes (OR, 3.05-10.31), along with dissatisfaction with information at recall (OR, 2.28-2.56), being foreign-born (OR, 2.35-3.71), and lack of social support (OR, 1.13-1.25). CONCLUSION: This 1-year longitudinal study shows that women experience psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography. Early recall should be performed cautiously, and provision of information as well as social support may reduce psychosocial consequences. IMPACT: Although delivery of population-based screening reduces breast cancer mortality, it also raises the issue of its impact on the psychosocial well-being of healthy women. Our findings identify predictors that can be targeted in future efforts to reduce the side effects of mammographic screening.
|
|
| 15. |
- Bolejko, Anetta, et al.
(author)
-
Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Consequences of Screening : Breast Cancer questionnaire
- 2014
-
In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648. ; 70:10, s. 2373-2388
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- AIM: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire addressing psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographic screening.BACKGROUND: The Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer questionnaires target psychosocial consequences of false-positive cancer screening. The Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer questionnaire and ten items not considered lung cancer specific from the Lung Cancer questionnaire have been adapted for use in mammographic screening in Sweden, but remain psychometrically untested.DESIGN: Instrument development paper with psychometric cross-sectional and test-retest design.METHODS: Twelve scales of a Swedish questionnaire version were tested by the Rasch model and traditional psychometric methods. Women with false-positive (Group I, n = 640) and negative (Group II, n = 802) screening mammography responded to the study questionnaire and the Nottingham Health Profile during 2009-2011.RESULTS: Iterative analyses resulted in nine scales demonstrating Rasch model fit, but all scales exhibited poor targeting with relatively large floor effects. Corrected item-total correlations exceeded the recommended criterion. Score differences between Groups I and II and correlations with Nottingham Health Profile sections followed an expected pattern. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability was acceptable for group-level assessments for ten and seven scales, respectively.CONCLUSIONS: Five scales (Sense of dejection, Anxiety, Behavioural, Sleep and Existential values) of the Swedish questionnaire version demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Other scales should be used more cautiously. Although filling an important gap, causes of concern were identified across scales. The questionnaire should therefore be considered for group-level assessments rather than for measurement of individual degrees of psychosocial consequences.
|
|
| 16. |
- Bolejko, Anetta, et al.
(author)
-
Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Consequences of Screening : Breast Cancer questionnaire
- 2014
-
In: Journal of Advanced Nursing. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 0309-2402 .- 1365-2648. ; 70:10, s. 2373-2388
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- AIM: To evaluate the psychometric properties of a questionnaire addressing psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammographic screening. BACKGROUND: The Consequences of Screening--Breast Cancer and Lung Cancer questionnaires target psychosocial consequences of false-positive cancer screening. The Consequences of Screening--Breast Cancer questionnaire and ten items not considered lung cancer specific from the Lung Cancer questionnaire have been adapted for use in mammographic screening in Sweden, but remain psychometrically untested. DESIGN: Instrument development paper with psychometric cross-sectional and test-retest design. METHODS: Twelve scales of a Swedish questionnaire version were tested by the Rasch model and traditional psychometric methods. Women with false-positive (Group I, n = 640) and negative (Group II, n = 802) screening mammography responded to the study questionnaire and the Nottingham Health Profile during 2009-2011. RESULTS: Iterative analyses resulted in nine scales demonstrating Rasch model fit, but all scales exhibited poor targeting with relatively large floor effects. Corrected item-total correlations exceeded the recommended criterion. Score differences between Groups I and II and correlations with Nottingham Health Profile sections followed an expected pattern. Cronbach's α and test-retest reliability was acceptable for group-level assessments for ten and seven scales, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Five scales (Sense of dejection, Anxiety, Behavioural, Sleep and Existential values) of the Swedish questionnaire version demonstrated the best psychometric properties. Other scales should be used more cautiously. Although filling an important gap, causes of concern were identified across scales. The questionnaire should therefore be considered for group-level assessments rather than for measurement of individual degrees of psychosocial consequences.
|
|
| 17. |
- Bolejko, Anetta
(author)
-
Psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography among women attending breast cancer screening. Assessment, prediction, and coping.
- 2014
-
Doctoral thesis (other academic/artistic)abstract
- One side-effect of breast cancer (BC) screening is a false-positive mammogram among healthy women. That is, finding(s) on a screening mammogram that lead to additional breast examinations but where the woman is eventually considered free from BC. There is evidence of short-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening. Regarding long-term consequences, research findings are inconsistent. Lack of validated condition-specific questionnaires targeting such consequences has been postulated as a potential reason for the inconsistencies. Therefore, the Consequences of Screening - Breast Cancer (COS-BC) questionnaire was developed in Denmark. However, before the COS-BC can be used for studying psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening across countries, it needs to be adapted and psychometrically (validity and reliability) tested therein. Furthermore, studies of prediction of long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening and coping with such consequences might identify women at risk as well as interventions to prevent consequences of screening. Thus, the aim of this thesis was to validate measures of and study the psychosocial consequences of false-positive mammography among women in a Swedish breast cancer screening programme, and to explore how women cope with such a situation. Interviews with 26 women experiencing false-positive screening mammography (Paper I) provided support for the content validity of a Swedish version of the COS-BC; questionnaire items were generally found relevant, understandable, and covering the psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening. Psychometric tests (Paper II) of the COS-BC among 1442 women with false-positive or negative mammography demonstrated support for five COS-BC scales (Sense of dejection, Anxiety, Behavioural, Sleep, and Existential values) for cross-sectional and longitudinal group assessments. The remaining seven COS-BC scales should be used more cautiously. One year follow-up study (Paper III, framework) of 399 recalled women and 449 controls showed that women experience psychosocial consequences targeted by the COS-BC scales, except for breast self-examination consequences. Early recall for subsequent mammography demonstrated the strongest prediction of long-term consequences. Dissatisfaction with information at recall, worry about BC, lack of social support, and being foreign-born were also identified as potential predictors. Interviews with 13 women (Paper IV) experiencing psychosocial consequences of false-positive screening mammography revealed that coping with the situation implied a roller coaster of emotions and sense. Social support, sisterhood, and being professionally taken care of were identified as important aspects of coping with the perceived psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening (Paper IV). In conclusion, findings of this thesis confirm the occurrence of short-term psychosocial consequences and demonstrated long-term consequences of false-positive screening mammography among women. Early recall should be avoided and personalized information and communication could be of value in order to diminish the risk of long-term psychosocial consequences of false-positive BC screening. Further research is needed to investigate adequate communication styles, especially in order to face multicultural populations in the context of BC screening.
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
- Dahlblom, Victor, et al.
(author)
-
Malmö Breast ImaginG database: objectives and development
- 2023
-
In: Journal of Medical Imaging. - 2329-4302. ; 10:6
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- PurposeWe describe the design and implementation of the Malmö Breast ImaginG (M-BIG) database, which will support research projects investigating various aspects of current and future breast cancer screening programs. Specifically, M-BIG will provide clinical data to: 1. investigate the effect of breast cancer screening on breast cancer prognosis and mortality; 2. develop and validate the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning in breast image interpretation; and 3. develop and validate image-based radiological breast cancer risk profiles.ApproachThe M-BIG database is intended to include a wide range of digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) examinations performed on women at the Mammography Clinic in Malmö, Sweden, from the introduction of DM in 2004 through 2020. Subjects may be included multiple times and for diverse reasons. The image data are linked to extensive clinical, diagnostic, and demographic data from several registries.ResultsTo date, the database contains a total of 451,054 examinations from 104,791 women. During the inclusion period, 95,258 unique women were screened. A total of 19,968 examinations were performed using DBT, whereas the rest used DM.ConclusionsWe describe the design and implementation of the M-BIG database as a representative and accessible medical image database linked to various types of medical data. Work is ongoing to add features and curate the existing data.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
