| 11. |
- Palsdottir, A, et al.
(författare)
-
Study of restriction fragment length polymorphism in the cystatin C gene of elderly patients with dementia and aged Down's syndrome patients
- 1989
-
Ingår i: Progress in Clinical and Biological Research. - 0361-7742. ; 317, s. 235-239
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Using a full length cystatin C cDNA probe and the Alu I restriction enzyme a total of 33 patients with senile dementia, Alzheimer type and 31 Down's syndrome patients have been investigated for the presence of the 630 bp Alu I restriction fragment length polymorphism in the cystatin C gene detected in Icelandic patients with hereditary cystatin C amyloid angiopathy. Results showed that all the patients had normal cystatin C fragment length of 600 bp.
|
|
| 12. |
|
|
| 13. |
|
|
| 14. |
- Pálsdóttir, K, et al.
(författare)
-
Inter-observer agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer.
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology. - : Wiley. - 0960-7692 .- 1469-0705. ; 58:5, s. 773-779
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the inter-observer agreement in relation to observer experience for the assessment of local tumor extension in women with cervical cancer, using transvaginal ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).METHODS: The observers comprised six US specialists with, and seven without previous experience of cervical cancer assessment, five experienced radiologists in pelvic MRI, and four less experienced radiology residents without previous MRI experience. The less experienced US observers, and all MRI observers underwent comprehensive training on assessment of cervical tumor extension while experienced US observers received written directives. All observers were assigned the same images from cervical cancer patients of all stages (n=60) for off-line evaluation on tumor detection, cervical stromal- (>1/3), and parametrial invasion. Inter-observer agreement was measured using Fleiss kappa, with 95% CI.RESULTS: Experienced and less experienced US observers had moderate agreement regarding tumor detection Fleiss κ [95% CI] (0.46 [0.40-0.53], and 0.46 [0.41-0.52]), stromal invasion (0.45 [0.38-0.51] and 0.53 [0.40-0.58]) and parametrial invasion (0.57 [0.51-0.64], and 0.44 [0.39-0.50]), respectively. Experienced and less experienced MRI observers had good κ [95% CI] (0.70 [0.62-0.78]) and moderate agreement (0.51 [0.41-0.62]), regarding tumor detection, good agreement regarding stromal invasion (0.80 [0.72-0.88] and 0.71 [0.61-0.81]) and parametrial invasion (0.69 [0.61-0.77] and 0.71[0.61-0.81]), respectively.CONCLUSION: The inter-observer agreement was moderate for US, and moderate - good for MRI regarding the assessment of local tumor extension. The level of inter-observer agreement was only associated with experience among US observers regarding parametrial invasion. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 15. |
|
|
| 16. |
|
|
| 17. |
- Salvo, G, et al.
(författare)
-
International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study
- 2019
-
Ingår i: International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society. - : BMJ. - 1525-1438. ; 29:3, s. 635-638
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Radical trachelectomy is considered a viable option for fertility preservation in patients with low-risk, early-stage cervical cancer. Standard approaches include laparotomy or minimally invasive surgery when performing radical trachelectomy.Primary ObjectiveTo compare disease-free survival between patients with FIGO (2009) stage IA2 or IB1 (≤2cm) cervical cancer who underwent open versus minimally invasive (laparoscopic or robotic) radical trachelectomy.Study HypothesisWe hypothesize that minimally invasive radical trachelectomy has similar oncologic outcomes to those of the open approach.Study DesignThis is a collaborative, multi-institutional, international, retrospective study. Patients who underwent a radical trachelectomy and lymphadenectomy between January 1, 2005 and December 31, 2017 will be included. Institutional review board approval will be required. Each institution will be provided access to a study-specific REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) database maintained by MD Anderson Cancer Center and will be responsible for entering patient data.Inclusion CriteriaPatients with squamous, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous cervical cancer FIGO (2009) stages IA2 and IB1 (≤2 cm) will be included. Surgery performed by the open approach or minimally invasive approach (laparoscopy or robotics). Tumor size ≤2 cm, by physical examination, ultrasound, MRI, CT, or positron emission tomography (at least one should confirm a tumor size ≤2 cm). Centers must contribute at least 15 cases of radical trachelectomy (open, minimally invasive, or both).Exclusion CriteriaPrior neoadjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy to the pelvis for cervical cancer at any time, prior lymphadenectomy, or pelvic retroperitoneal surgery, pregnant patients, aborted trachelectomy (intra-operative conversion to radical hysterectomy), or vaginal approach.Primary EndpointThe primary endpoint is disease-free survival measured as the time from surgery until recurrence or death due to disease. To evaluate the primary objective, we will compare disease-free survival among patients with FIGO (2009) stage IA2 or IB1 (≤2cm) cervical cancer who underwent open versus minimally invasive radical trachelectomy.Sample SizeAn estimated 535 patients will be included; 256 open and 279 minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. Previous studies have shown that recurrence rates in the open group range from 3.8% to 7.6%. Assuming that the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate for patients who underwent open surgery is 95.0%, we have 80% power to detect a 0.44 HR using α level 0.10. This corresponds to an 89.0% disease-free survival rate at 4.5 years in the minimally invasive group.
|
|
| 18. |
|
|
| 19. |
- Salvo, Gloria, et al.
(författare)
-
Open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer : International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study
- 2022
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-9378 .- 1097-6868. ; 226:1, s. 1-97
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: Minimally invasive radical trachelectomy has emerged as an alternative to open radical hysterectomy for patients with early-stage cervical cancer desiring future fertility. Recent data suggest worse oncologic outcomes after minimally invasive radical hysterectomy than after open radical hysterectomy in stage I cervical cancer. Objective: We aimed to compare 4.5-year disease-free survival after open vs minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. Study Design: This was a collaborative, international retrospective study (International Radical Trachelectomy Assessment Study) of patients treated during 2005–2017 at 18 centers in 12 countries. Eligible patients had squamous carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, or adenosquamous carcinoma; had a preoperative tumor size of ≤2 cm; and underwent open or minimally invasive (robotic or laparoscopic) radical trachelectomy with nodal assessment (pelvic lymphadenectomy and/or sentinel lymph node biopsy). The exclusion criteria included neoadjuvant chemotherapy or preoperative pelvic radiotherapy, previous lymphadenectomy or pelvic retroperitoneal surgery, pregnancy, stage IA1 disease with lymphovascular space invasion, aborted trachelectomy (conversion to radical hysterectomy), or vaginal approach. Surgical approach, indication, and adjuvant therapy regimen were at the discretion of the treating institution. A total of 715 patients were entered into the study database. However, 69 patients were excluded, leaving 646 in the analysis. Endpoints were the 4.5-year disease-free survival rate (primary), 4.5-year overall survival rate (secondary), and recurrence rate (secondary). Kaplan-Meier methods were used to estimate disease-free survival and overall survival. A post hoc weighted analysis was performed, comparing the recurrence rates between surgical approaches, with open surgery being considered as standard and minimally invasive surgery as experimental. Results: Of 646 patients, 358 underwent open surgery, and 288 underwent minimally invasive surgery. The median (range) patient age was 32 (20–42) years for open surgery vs 31 (18–45) years for minimally invasive surgery (P=.11). Median (range) pathologic tumor size was 15 (0–31) mm for open surgery and 12 (0.8–40) mm for minimally invasive surgery (P=.33). The rates of pelvic nodal involvement were 5.3% (19 of 358 patients) for open surgery and 4.9% (14 of 288 patients) for minimally invasive surgery (P=.81). Median (range) follow-up time was 5.5 (0.20–16.70) years for open surgery and 3.1 years (0.02–11.10) years for minimally invasive surgery (P<.001). At 4.5 years, 17 of 358 patients (4.7%) with open surgery and 18 of 288 patients (6.2%) with minimally invasive surgery had recurrence (P=.40). The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates were 94.3% (95% confidence interval, 91.6–97.0) for open surgery and 91.5% (95% confidence interval, 87.6–95.6) for minimally invasive surgery (log-rank P=.37). Post hoc propensity score analysis of recurrence risk showed no difference between surgical approaches (P=.42). At 4.5 years, there were 6 disease-related deaths (open surgery, 3; minimally invasive surgery, 3) (log-rank P=.49). The 4.5-year overall survival rates were 99.2% (95% confidence interval, 97.6–99.7) for open surgery and 99.0% (95% confidence interval, 79.0–99.8) for minimally invasive surgery. Conclusion: The 4.5-year disease-free survival rates did not differ between open radical trachelectomy and minimally invasive radical trachelectomy. However, recurrence rates in each group were low. Ongoing prospective studies of conservative management of early-stage cervical cancer may help guide future management.
|
|
| 20. |
|
|
