| 11. |
- Alfonso, Fernando, et al.
(författare)
-
Authorship : from credit to accountability. Reflections from the Editors' Network.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Basic Research in Cardiology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 0300-8428 .- 1435-1803. ; 114:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Editors' Network of the European Society of Cardiology provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility and accountability. These issues are now covered by the new (fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensure that questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implications of this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices.
|
|
| 12. |
- Alfonso, Fernando, et al.
(författare)
-
Authorship : From Credit to Accountability Reflections From the Editors´ Network.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Anatolian journal of cardiology. - 2149-2263 .- 2149-2271. ; 21:5, s. 281-286
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The Editors´ Network of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) provides a dynamic forum for editorial discussions and endorses the recommendations of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) to improve the scientific quality of biomedical journals. Authorship confers credit and important academic rewards. Recently, however, the ICMJE emphasized that authorship also requires responsibility and accountability. These issues are now covered by the new (fourth) criterion for authorship. Authors should agree to be accountable and ensure that questions regarding the accuracy and integrity of the entire work will be appropriately addressed. This review discusses the implications of this paradigm shift on authorship requirements with the aim of increasing awareness on good scientific and editorial practices.
|
|
| 13. |
- Simard, Trevor, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of Center Experience on Patient Radiation Exposure During Transradial Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Intervention : A Patient-Level, International, Collaborative, Multi-Center Analysis
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of the American Heart Association. - Hoboken, USA : Wiley-Blackwell. - 2047-9980. ; 5:6
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: The adoption of the transradial (TR) approach over the traditional transfemoral (TF) approach has been hampered by concerns of increased radiation exposure-a subject of considerable debate within the field. We performed a patient-level, multi-center analysis to definitively address the impact of TR access on radiation exposure.Methods and Results: Overall, 10 centers were included from 6 countries-Canada (2 centers), United Kingdom (2), Germany (2), Sweden (2), Hungary (1), and The Netherlands (1). We compared the radiation exposure of TR versus TF access using measured dose-area product (DAP). To account for local variations in equipment and exposure, standardized TR:TF DAP ratios were constructed per center with procedures separated by coronary angiography (CA) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among 57 326 procedures, we demonstrated increased radiation exposure with the TR versus TF approach, particularly in the CA cohort across all centers (weighted-average ratios: CA, 1.15; PCI, 1.05). However, this was mitigated by increasing TR experience in the PCI cohort across all centers (r=-0.8; P=0.005). Over time, as a center transitioned to increasing TR experience (r=0.9; P=0.001), a concomitant decrease in radiation exposure occurred (r=-0.8; P=0.006). Ultimately, when a center's balance of TR to TF procedures approaches 50%, the resultant radiation exposure was equivalent.Conclusions: The TR approach is associated with a modest increase in patient radiation exposure. However, this increase is eliminated when the TR and TF approaches are used with equal frequency-a guiding principle for centers adopting the TR approach.
|
|
| 14. |
- Delewi, Ronak, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical and Procedural Characteristics Associated With Higher Radiation Exposure During Percutaneous Coronary Interventions and Coronary Angiography.
- 2013
-
Ingår i: Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions. - 1941-7632. ; 6, s. 501-506
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: WE AIM TO STUDY THE CLINICAL AND PROCEDURAL CHARACTERISTICS ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHER RADIATION EXPOSURE IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONS (PCIS) AND CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY.METHODS AND RESULTS: OUR PRESENT STUDY INCLUDED ALL CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND PCI PROCEDURES IN 5 PCI CENTERS IN THE WESTERN PART OF SWEDEN, BETWEEN JANUARY 1, 2008, AND JANUARY 19, 2012. THE RADIATION EXPOSURE AND CLINICAL DATA WERE COLLECTED PROSPECTIVELY IN THESE 5 PCI CENTERS IN SWEDEN AS PART OF THE SWEDISH CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY AND ANGIOPLASTY REGISTRY (SCAAR). A PREDICTION MODEL WAS MADE FOR THE RADIATION EXPOSURE (DOSEAREA PRODUCT) EXPRESSED IN GYCM(2). A TOTAL OF 20 669 PROCEDURES WERE INCLUDED IN THE PRESENT STUDY, CONSISTING OF 9850 PCI AND 10 819 CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY PROCEDURES. IN MULTIVARIABLE ANALYSES, BODY MASS INDEX (=1.04; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL [CI], 1.041.04; P0.001); HISTORY OF CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT SURGERY (=1.32; CI, 1.281.32; P0.001); 2, 3, OR 4 TREATED LESIONS (2 TREATED LESIONS: =1.95; CI, 1.842.03; P0.001; 3 TREATED LESIONS: =2.34; CI, 2.162.53; P0.001; AND 4 TREATED LESIONS: =2.83; CI, 2.533.16; P0.001); AND CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSION LESIONS (=1.39; CI, 1.311.48; P0.001) WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE HIGHEST RADIATION EXPOSURE. AFTER ADJUSTING FOR PROCEDURAL COMPLEXITY, RADIAL ACCESS ROUTE WAS NOT ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RADIATION EXPOSURE (=1.00; CI, 0.981.03; P=0.67).CONCLUSIONS: In the largest study population to assess radiation exposure, we found that high body mass index, history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery, number of treated lesions, and chronic total occlusions were associated with the highest patient radiation exposure. Radial access site was not associated with higher radiation exposure when compared with femoral approach.
|
|
| 15. |
- Dewey, Marc, et al.
(författare)
-
Clinical quantitative cardiac imaging for the assessment of myocardial ischaemia
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Nature Reviews Cardiology. - : Springer Nature. - 1759-5002 .- 1759-5010. ; 17:7, s. 427-450
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Cardiac imaging has a pivotal role in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of ischaemic heart disease. SPECT is most commonly used for clinical myocardial perfusion imaging, whereas PET is the clinical reference standard for the quantification of myocardial perfusion. MRI does not involve exposure to ionizing radiation, similar to echocardiography, which can be performed at the bedside. CT perfusion imaging is not frequently used but CT offers coronary angiography data, and invasive catheter-based methods can measure coronary flow and pressure. Technical improvements to the quantification of pathophysiological parameters of myocardial ischaemia can be achieved. Clinical consensus recommendations on the appropriateness of each technique were derived following a European quantitative cardiac imaging meeting and using a real-time Delphi process. SPECT using new detectors allows the quantification of myocardial blood flow and is now also suited to patients with a high BMI. PET is well suited to patients with multivessel disease to confirm or exclude balanced ischaemia. MRI allows the evaluation of patients with complex disease who would benefit from imaging of function and fibrosis in addition to perfusion. Echocardiography remains the preferred technique for assessing ischaemia in bedside situations, whereas CT has the greatest value for combined quantification of stenosis and characterization of atherosclerosis in relation to myocardial ischaemia. In patients with a high probability of needing invasive treatment, invasive coronary flow and pressure measurement is well suited to guide treatment decisions. In this Consensus Statement, we summarize the strengths and weaknesses as well as the future technological potential of each imaging modality.
|
|
| 16. |
- Petraco, Ricardo, et al.
(författare)
-
Real-time use of instantaneous wave-free ratio: Results of the ADVISE in-practice: An international, multicenter evaluation of instantaneous wave-free ratio in clinical practice
- 2014
-
Ingår i: American Heart Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 1097-6744 .- 0002-8703. ; 168:5, s. 739-748
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objectives To evaluate the first experience of real-time instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) measurement by clinicians. Background The iFR is a new vasodilator-free index of coronary stenosis severity, calculated as a trans-lesion pressure ratio during a specific period of baseline diastole, when distal resistance is lowest and stable. Because all previous studies have calculated iFR offline, the feasibility of real-time iFR measurement has never been assessed. Methods Three hundred ninety-two stenoses with angiographically intermediate stenoses were included in this multicenter international analysis. Instantaneous wave free ratio and fractional flow reserve (FFR) were performed in real time on commercially available consoles. The classification agreement of coronary stenoses between iFR and FFR was calculated. Results Instantaneous wave-free ratio and FFR maintain a close level of diagnostic agreement when both are measured by clinicians in real time (for a clinical 0.80 FFR cutoff: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [ROCAUC] 0.87, classification match 80%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.90; for a ischemic 0.75 FFR cutoff: iFR ROCAUC 0.90, classification match 88%, and optimal iFR cutoff 0.85; if the FFR 0.75-0.80 gray zone is accounted for: ROCAUC 0.93, classification match 92%). When iFR and FFR are evaluated together in a hybrid decision-making strategy, 61% of the population is spared from vasodilator while maintaining a 94% overall agreement with FFR lesion classification. Conclusion When measured in real time, iFR maintains the close relationship to FFR reported in offline studies. These findings confirm the feasibility and reliability of real-time iFR calculation by clinicians.
|
|
| 17. |
|
|
