| 1. |
- Loeb, Stacy, et al.
(författare)
-
Evaluation of the 2015 Gleason Grade Groups in a Nationwide Population-based Cohort
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 69:6, s. 1135-1141
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: New five-tiered Gleason grade groups (GGGs) were recently proposed, in which Gleason 6 is GGG 1, Gleason 3 + 4 is GGG 2, Gleason 4 + 3 is GGG 3, Gleason 8 is GGG 4, and Gleason 9-10 is GGG 5. Objective: To examine the performance of the new GGGs in men with prostate cancer from a nationwide population-based cohort. Design, setting, and participants: From the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden, we identified 5880 men diagnosed with prostate cancer from 2005 to 2007, including 4325 who had radical prostatectomy and 1555 treated with radiation therapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards models, and concordance indices were used to examine the relationship between the GGGs and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. Results and limitations: Among men treated with surgery, the 4-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival rates were 89%, 82%, 74%, 77%, and 49% for GGG 1-5 on biopsy, and 92%, 85%, 73%, 63%, and 51% based on prostatectomy GGG, respectively. For men treated by radiation therapy, men with biopsy GGG of 1-5 had 4-yr biochemical recurrence-free survival rates of 95%, 91%, 85%, 78%, and 70%. Adjusting for preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen and clinical stage, biopsy GGGs were significant independent predictors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy. The new 5-tier system resulted in virtually no change in predictive accuracy compared with the current 3- and 4-tier classifications. Limitations include a median follow-up of 4.6 yr, precluding the ability to examine long-term oncologic outcomes. Conclusions: The newly proposed GGGs offer a simplified, user-friendly nomenclature to aid in patient counseling, with similar predictive accuracy in a population-based setting to previous classifications. Patient summary: The new Gleason grade groups, ranging from 1-5, provide a simplified, user-friendly classification system to predict the risk of recurrence after prostatectomy and radiation therapy.
|
|
| 3. |
- Loeb, Stacy, et al.
(författare)
-
Phosphodiesterase Type 5 Inhibitor Use and Disease Recurrence After Prostate Cancer Treatment
- 2016
-
Ingår i: European Urology. - : Elsevier. - 0302-2838 .- 1873-7560. ; 70:5, s. 824-828
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor (PDE5i) use is common for management of erectile dysfunction. Single-institution studies have reported conflicting data on the relationship between PDE5i use and biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer (BCR) after radical prostatectomy.OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between PDE5i use and BCR after radical prostatectomy and radiation therapy in a nationwide population-based cohort.DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a nested case-control study using the National Prostate Cancer Register of Sweden linked to the Prescribed Drug Register. Among men with localized prostate cancer who underwent primary radical prostatectomy or radiation therapy during 2006-2007 with 5 yr of follow-up, 293 had BCR after treatment (cases). For each case we identified 20 BCR-free controls (n=5767) using incidence density sampling.OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Multivariable conditional logistic regression was used to examine the association between PDE5i use and BCR risk. Separate multivariable models including clinical variables for men undergoing prostatectomy or radiotherapy and including surgical pathology after prostatectomy were also analyzed.RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: PDE5i use was not associated with BCR after radical prostatectomy (odds ratio [OR] 0.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-1.03) or radiation therapy (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.49-1.97) after adjusting for marital status, education, income, prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason score, and proportion of positive biopsies. Results were similar after additional adjustment for surgical pathology (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.64-1.16). Men whose cumulative number of PDE5i pills was above the median had a slightly lower BCR risk after prostatectomy in the clinical model, and no difference in BCR risk after adjustment for pathologic tumor features.CONCLUSIONS: Our results from a population-based cohort suggest that BCR risk is not higher among men using PDE5i after prostate cancer treatment.PATIENT SUMMARY: Erectile dysfunction medications are not associated with a higher risk of disease recurrence after prostate cancer treatment.
|
|
