| 1. |
- Ahonen, Matti, et al.
(författare)
-
Back Pain and Quality of Life 10 Years After Segmental Pedicle Screw Instrumentation for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 48:10, s. 665-671
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design.Comparative cohort study. Objective.The aim of the present study was to evaluate pain and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in surgically managed patients with a minimum follow-up of 10 years compared with patients with untreated adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and a healthy control group. Summary of Background Data.Posterior spinal fusion with pedicle screws is the standard treatment for AIS, although it remains unclear whether this procedure results in improved long-term HRQoL compared with untreated patients with AIS. Patients and Methods.Sixty-four consecutive patients at a minimum follow-up of 10 years, who underwent posterior pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS were prospectively enrolled. Fifty-three (83%) of these patients completed Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) 24 questionnaires, clinical examination, and standing spinal radiographs. Pain and HRQoL were compared with age and sex-matched patients with untreated AIS and healthy individuals. Results.The mean major curve was 57 degrees preoperatively and 15 degrees at the 10-year follow-up. SRS-24 self-image domain score showed a significant improvement from preoperative to 2 years and remained significantly better at the 10-year follow-up (P < 0.001). Patients fused to L3 or below had lower pain, satisfaction, and total score than patients fused to L2 or above (P < 0.05), but self-image, function, and activity scores did not differ between groups at 10-year follow-up. Pain, self-image, general activity, and total SRS domains were significantly better at 10-year follow-up in the surgically treated patients as compared with untreated patients (all P < 0.05). Healthy controls had significantly higher total scores than those surgically treated at 10-year follow-ups (P < 0.001). Conclusion.Patients undergoing segmental pedicle screw instrumentation for AIS maintain high-level HRQoL during a 10-year follow-up. Their HRQoL was significantly better than in the untreated patients with AIS, except for the function domain. However, HRQoL remained at a lower level than in healthy controls.
|
|
| 2. |
- Gerdhem, Lovisa, et al.
(författare)
-
Patient-reported Data as Predictors of Surgical Outcome in Patients With Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy : Analysis of a National Multicenter Dataset
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 48:2, s. 113-119
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study Design: Retrospective study design on prospectively collected registry data.Objective: To investigate whether improvement after surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy is associated with preoperative disease severity and to identify predictors of outcome.Summary of Background Data: Degenerative cervical myelopathy is the most common cause of spinal cord compromise in adults and surgery is often the treatment of choice. Identifying predictors may help to improve patient selection.Materials and Methods: This nationwide study from the Swedish spine registry included 901 patients treated surgically for degenerative cervical myelopathy. To investigate improvement in different disease severity groups, the individuals were divided into quartiles based on their preoperative European Myelopathy Scale (EMS) and EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) index. Statistical analyses were made with analysis of variance, χ2, McNemar, and t tests. Multivariable linear or logistic regression was used to identify predictors for one-year improvement in EMS and EQ-5D index, and satisfaction at one year. In the regressions, the patient-reported outcome measures were dichotomized at their median, except improvement in EMS.Results: All patient-reported outcome measures improved from baseline to the one-year follow-up (P<0.001). Statistically significant outcome improvements were seen in all disease severity groups. Preoperative low EMS (β=−1.37, P<0.001), long walking distance (<500 vs. >500 m; β=0.44, P=0.030), and low NDI (β=−0.43, P=0.048) were independent predictors of improvement in EMS. R2 was 0.11 for the multivariable model. Preoperative low EQ-5D index (odds ratio=0.11; 95% confidence interval: 0.07–0.16) and low NDI (0.56; 0.36–0.88) were independent predictors of improvement in EQ-5D index. Preoperative high EMS (1.86; 1.20–2.90) and shorter arm pain duration [<12 vs. >12 months (0.54; 0.33–0.88)] were independent predictors of satisfaction.Conclusions: Postoperative improvement was seen over the whole range of disease severity. Disease severity, symptom duration, and walking distance were predictors of outcome in patients treated surgically for degenerative cervical myelopathy.
|
|
| 3. |
- Singh, Aman, et al.
(författare)
-
Outcome and Health-Related Quality of Life After Combined Anteroposterior Surgery Versus Anterior Surgery Alone in Subaxial Cervical Spine Fractures Analysis of a National Multicenter Data Set
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Spine. - : Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health). - 0362-2436 .- 1528-1159. ; 48:12, s. 853-858
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Study design.Observational study on prospectively collected data. Objectives.To compare patient-reported outcomes and complications after anteroposterior surgery or anterior surgery in subaxial cervical spine fractures. Summary of Background Data.There is no consensus regarding the optimal surgical approach for subaxial cervical spine fractures. Although anterior surgery is often sufficient to restore stability, anteroposterior surgery is sometimes preferred in severe instability. The effects of a more extensive procedure on patient-reported outcomes have not been investigated. We hypothesized that patient-reported outcomes and complication rates were similar between these surgical approaches. Materials and Methods.Individuals treated with either a combined anteroposterior or anterior surgery alone between 2006 and 2016 and with at least 1-year follow-up were identified in the Swedish Spine Registry. Cases were matched 1:2 for age (+/- 5 y). Outcomes were Neck Disability Index (NDI), EQ-5D-3L index, satisfaction, reoperations, and surgeon-reported and patient-reported complications within 90 days. Mann-Whitney U-tests and chi(2) tests were used in statistical comparisons. Results.The median [interquartile range] number of instrumented vertebrae was 3 [2-5.5] in the anteroposterior group and 2 [2-3] in the anterior group (P<0.001). The mean +/- SD follow-up time was 3.5 +/- 2.3 years in the anteroposterior and 3.8 +/- 2.0 years in the anterior group (P=0.39), respectively. At follow-up, Neck Disability Index was 20 [6-37] in the anteroposterior group and 18 [3.5-40] in the anterior group (P=0.69), and the median EQ-5D-3L index was 0.73 [0.12-0.80] in the anteroposterior group and 0.75 [0.62-0.89] in the anterior group (P=0.27). Satisfaction with the treatment was reported by 90% in the anteroposterior group and by 87% in the anterior group (P=0.98). None of the individuals in the anteroposterior and 6 of the individuals in the anterior group were reoperated (P=0.18). Conclusion.Patients operated on with anteroposterior or anterior surgery for subaxial cervical spine fractures are equally satisfied and report similar health-related quality of life measures.
|
|
