| 1. |
- Bevan, David, et al.
(författare)
-
Responsibility beyond CSR
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Business Ethics. - 0167-4544 .- 1573-0697. ; 101:Supplement 1, s. 1-4
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
|
|
| 2. |
- Boholm, Åsa, 1953, et al.
(författare)
-
A relational theory of risk
- 2011
-
Ingår i: Journal of Risk Research. - : Informa UK Limited. ; 14:2, s. 175-190
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This paper outlines a relational theory of risk. According to this theory, risk emerges from situated cognition that establishes a relationship of risk between a risk object and an object at risk, so that the risk object is considered, under certain contingent circumstances and in some causal way, to threaten the valued object at risk. This relational theory of risk is a theory about the interpretative nature of risk that answers the key theoretical and practical questions of why and how something is considered a risk. The relational theory of risk allows for the interpretation of risk situations as culturally informed, and thereby suggests new ways to approach risk communication, risk governance, and risk management by taking into account bounded rationalities of thought and action.
|
|
| 3. |
- Boholm, Åsa, 1953, et al.
(författare)
-
The practice of risk governance: lessons from the field
- 2012
-
Ingår i: Journal of Risk Research. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1366-9877 .- 1466-4461. ; 15:1, s. 1-20
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- In contradistinction to generic and formal risk governance models such as the IRGC framework, this paper advocates the relevance of a contextual and practice-based approach to organizational risk governance. Three cases illustrate the socially situated dynamics of risk governance practice: public transportation management, river management, and railway planning. Risk governance is shown to derive from how actors, in their daily activities, mediate multi-level and regulatory institutional constraints, and solve actual problems through routines, trust, mutual understanding and not least, shared commitment to the societal role of infrastructure. Our findings underscore that risk governance takes place in contexts that are historically, spatially and institutionally situated. We therefore suggest that one needs to pay attention to the characteristics of this contextuality to understand the social dynamics of governance.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
