1. |
|
|
2. |
- Hemlin, Sven, 1948, et al.
(författare)
-
Creative Knowledge Environments
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Creativity Research Journal. - : Informa UK Limited. - 1040-0419 .- 1532-6934. ; 20:2, s. 196-210
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The extent to which an individual’s (or a group’s) creative potential is expressed depends considerably on the environment in which that individual (or group) works. To understand scientific and technological creativity, one needs to analyze the interactions between individuals or groups and their environment. We put forward the concept of a creative knowledge environment (CKE) to examine the environmental influences on individual and group creativity.After reviewing the research literature relevant to creativity using the CKE framework, we identify themain influences promoting creativity at different levels of organization. The framework provides suggestions as to how best to stimulate CKEs to be more creative. The article concludes by identifying issues where further research is needed.
|
|
3. |
|
|
4. |
|
|
5. |
|
|
6. |
|
|
7. |
- Allwood, Carl Martin, et al.
(författare)
-
Adjusting new initiatives to the social environment: Organizational decision making as learning, commitment creating and behavior regulation.
- 2005
-
Ingår i: How professionals make decisions. - 1410611728 ; , s. 223-232
-
Konferensbidrag (refereegranskat)abstract
- In this study we investigated how managers make strategical decisions in complex, dynamic, and real-time environments and in different decision domains. The managers we interviewed were usually ‘in charge’ of the tasks. Our results showed that the informants mostly constructed only one or two decision alternatives and that they did this to a large extent through communication with other persons, within and outside the organization. In this way the decision makers accomplished many effects: for example learning about the decision and the constructed alternative/s, selling in the decision, increasing the chances that the decision would be formally accepted by the board and increasing the chances for its implementation. In addition, more than a quarter of our informants thought that selling-in (our translation of the Swedish word ”förankring”) was the most difficult part of the decision process.
|
|
8. |
|
|
9. |
|
|
10. |
|
|