| 1. |
- Brommesson, Sara, et al.
(författare)
-
Tiling array-CGH for the assessment of genomic similarities among synchronous unilateral and bilateral invasive breast cancer tumor pairs.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: BMC Clinical Pathology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6890. ; 8:July 10
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: Today, no objective criteria exist to differentiate between individual primary tumors and intra- or intermammary dissemination respectively, in patients diagnosed with two or more synchronous breast cancers. To elucidate whether these tumors most likely arise through clonal expansion, or whether they represent individual primary tumors is of tumor biological interest and may have clinical implications. In this respect, high resolution genomic profiling may provide a more reliable approach than conventional histopathological and tumor biological factors. METHODS: 32 K tiling microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) was used to explore the genomic similarities among synchronous unilateral and bilateral invasive breast cancer tumor pairs, and was compared with histopathological and tumor biological parameters. RESULTS: Based on global copy number profiles and unsupervised hierarchical clustering, five of ten (p = 1.9 x 10-5) unilateral tumor pairs displayed similar genomic profiles within the pair, while only one of eight bilateral tumor pairs (p = 0.29) displayed pair-wise genomic similarities. DNA index, histological type and presence of vessel invasion correlated with the genomic analyses. CONCLUSION: Synchronous unilateral tumor pairs are often genomically similar, while synchronous bilateral tumors most often represent individual primary tumors. However, two independent unilateral primary tumors can develop synchronously and contralateral tumor spread can occur. The presence of an intraductal component is not informative when establishing the independence of two tumors, while vessel invasion, the presence of which was found in clustering tumor pairs but not in tumor pairs that did not cluster together, supports the clustering outcome. Our data suggest that genomically similar unilateral tumor pairs may represent a more aggressive disease that requires the addition of more severe treatment modalities, and underscores the importance of evaluating the clonality of multiple tumors for optimal patient management. In summary, our findings demonstrate the importance of evaluating the properties of both tumors in order to determine the most optimal patient management.
|
|
| 2. |
- Dihge, Looket, et al.
(författare)
-
Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor modulator amplified in breast cancer (AIB1) for predicting clinical outcome after adjuvant tamoxifen in breast cancer.
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1573-7217 .- 0167-6806. ; 109:2, s. 255-262
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the estrogen receptor (ER) modulator Amplified In Breast cancer-1 (AIB1) have been reported to be of importance for the prognosis of breast cancer patients. We have analyzed AIB1 and EGFR by immunohistochemistry in primary breast cancers (n = 297) arranged in a tissue microarray in order to predict outcome after adjuvant endocrine therapy with tamoxifen for two years. High expression of AIB1 was associated with DNA-nondiploidy, high S-phase fraction, HER2 amplification, and short term (≤2 years) distant disease-free survival (DDFS), independent of ER status. High expression of EGFR was strongly associated to ER negativity and also correlated with progesterone receptor negativity, high S-phase fraction, and inversely correlated with nodal metastases. In univariate analysis, high EGFR was associated with shorter DDFS (hazard ratio 2.1; P = 0.017), and reached borderline significance in a multivariate analysis, adjusting for ER, menopausal and lymph node status, tumor size, and HER2 (P = 0.057). In conclusion, both AIB1 and EGFR were associated to DDFS for breast cancer patients treated with two years of adjuvant tamoxifen; AIB1 with the development of early distant recurrences, indicating association between high AIB1 and resistance to tamoxifen during treatment, and EGFR with distant recurrences up to a follow up of five years.
|
|
| 3. |
- Grabau, Dorthe
(författare)
-
Breast cancer patients with micrometastases only: Is a basis provided for tailored treatment?
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0960-7404. ; 17, s. 211-217
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Women with breast cancer and micrometastases only constitute a treatment dilemma. If only a micrometastasis is found in a sentinel lymph node, an axillary lymph node dissection may be considered to be overtreatment and perhaps could be avoided. However, studies have shown decreased survival in patients with micrometastases only. This paper focuses on the pathological work-up behind the classification of breast cancer patients having micrometastases only and on the most recent literature concerning prognosis for breast cancer patients with micrometastases. The goal was to determine if studies to date have been able to define a population of breast cancer patients with micrometastases where the size of the metastasis could indicate whether an axillary lymph node dissection should be undertaken. Tailored surgical treatment of breast cancer patients with micrometastases only is not possible at the present time, due to lack of standardization in the pathological work-up of lymph nodes, which implies that this group of breast cancer patients cannot be delimited with sufficient precision. Tailored systemic therapy is also impossible due to lack of a precisely defined target for a feasible therapy.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Honeth, Gabriella, et al.
(författare)
-
The CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype is enriched in basal-like breast tumors
- 2008
-
Ingår i: Breast Cancer Research. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1465-5411 .- 1465-542X. ; 10:3
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction Human breast tumors are heterogeneous and consist of phenotypically diverse cells. Breast cancer cells with a CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype have been suggested to have tumor-initiating properties with stem cell-like and invasive features, although it is unclear whether their presence within a tumor has clinical implications. There is also a large heterogeneity between tumors, illustrated by reproducible stratification into various subtypes based on gene expression profiles or histopathological features. We have explored the prevalence of cells with different CD44/CD24 phenotypes within breast cancer subtypes. Methods Double-staining immunohistochemistry was used to quantify CD44 and CD24 expression in 240 human breast tumors for which information on other tumor markers and clinical characteristics was available. Gene expression data were also accessible for a cohort of the material. Results A considerable heterogeneity in CD44 and CD24 expression was seen both between and within tumors. A complete lack of both proteins was evident in 35% of the tumors, while 13% contained cells of more than one of the CD44(+)/CD24(-), CD44(-)/CD24(+) and CD44(+)/CD24(+) phenotypes. CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells were detected in 31% of the tumors, ranging in proportion from only a few to close to 100% of tumor cells. The CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype was most common in the basal-like subgroup-characterized as negative for the estrogen and progesterone receptors as well as for HER2, and as positive for cytokeratin 5/14 and/or epidermal growth factor receptor, and particularly common in BRCA1 hereditary tumors, of which 94% contained CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells. The CD44(+)/CD24(-) phenotype was surprisingly scarce in HER2+ tumors, which had a predominantly CD24(+) status. A CD44(+)/CD24(-) gene expression signature was generated, which included CD44 and alpha(6)-integrin (CD49f) among the top-ranked overexpressed genes. Conclusion We demonstrate an association between basal-like and particularly BRCA1 hereditary breast cancer and the presence of CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells. Not all basal-like tumors and very few HER2+ tumors, however, contain CD44(+)/CD24(-) cells, emphasizing that a putative tumorigenic ability may not be confined to cells of this phenotype and that other breast cancer stem cell markers remain to be identified.
|
|
| 6. |
- Jönsson, Mats, et al.
(författare)
-
Experiences from treatment-predictive KRAS testing; high mutation frequency in rectal cancers from females and concurrent mutations in the same tumor
- 2009
-
Ingår i: BMC Clinical Pathology. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1472-6890. ; 9:Oct 15, s. 8-8
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: KRAS mutations represent key alterations in colorectal cancer development and lead to constitutive EGFR signaling. Since EGFR inhibition represents a therapeutic strategy in advanced colorectal cancer, KRAS mutation analysis has quickly been introduced as a treatment-predictive test.METHODS: We used a real-time PCR based method to determine KRAS mutations in 136 colorectal cancers with mutations identified in 53 (39%) tumors.RESULTS: KRAS mutations were significantly more often found in rectal cancer (21/38, 55%) than in colon cancer (32/98, 33%) (P = 0.02). This finding was explained by marked differences mutation rates in female patients who showed mutations in 33% of the colon cancers and in 67% of the rectal cancers (P = 0.01). Concurrent KRAS mutations were identified in three tumors; two colorectal cancers harbored Gly12Asp/Gly13Asp and Gly12Cys/Gly13Asp and a third tumor carried Gly12Cys/Gly12Asp in an adenomatous component and additionally acquired Gly12Val in the invasive component.CONCLUSION: The demonstration of a particularly high KRAS mutation frequency among female rectal cancer patients suggests that this subset is the least likely to respond to anti-EGFR therapies, whereas the observation of concurrent KRAS mutations imply that repeated KRAS targeting may occur during tumor progression in a subset of colorectal cancers.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
|
|
