| 1. |
- Wijns, W, et al.
(författare)
-
Myocardial revascularization
- 2011
-
Ingår i: REVISTA PORTUGUESA DE CARDIOLOGIA. - : Elsevier BV. - 0870-2551 .- 2174-2049. ; 30:12, s. 951-1005
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
- Prescott, E., et al.
(författare)
-
Improving diagnosis and treatment of women with angina pectoris and microvascular disease: The iPOWER study design and rationale
- 2014
-
Ingår i: American Heart Journal. - : Elsevier BV. - 0002-8703. ; 167:4, s. 452-458
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background The iPOWER study aims at determining whether routine assessment of coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease is feasible and identifies women at risk. Methods All women with angina referred to invasive angiographic assessment in Eastern Denmark are invited to join the study according to in- and exclusion criteria. Assessment includes demographic, clinical and psychosocial data, symptoms, electrocardiogram, blood- and urine samples and transthoracic echocardiography during rest and dipyridamol stress with measurement of coronary flow reserve (CFR) by Doppler of the left anterior descending artery. In substudies CMD will be assessed by positron emission tomography, peripheral endothelial function, magnetic resonance imaging-and computed tomography derived myocardial perfusion scans, angiographic corrected TIMI frame counts, advanced echocardiographic modalities at rest and during stress, and invasive measures of CFR and coronary vascular reactivity. The study will include 2000 women who will be followed for 5 years for cardiovascular outcomes. Results By May 2013, 1685 women have been screened, 759 eligible patients identified, 530 contacted, and 299 (56%) agreed to participate. Among the first 50 patients, Doppler CFR was successfully measured in 49 (98%). Conclusions Among women with suspected ischemic heart disease and no obstructive coronary artery disease, non-invasive Doppler CFR is feasible as a routine assessment. The study will provide information on methods to diagnose CMD and determine the prognostic value of routine non-invasive assessment ofmicrovascular function. Future study will provide women identified with CMD participation in interventional substudies designed to test treatment strategies.
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Dallongeville, Jean, et al.
(författare)
-
Survey of physicians' practices in the control of cardiovascular risk factors : the EURIKA study.
- 2012
-
Ingår i: European journal of preventive cardiology. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 2047-4881 .- 2047-4873. ; 19:3, s. 541-550
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES: To assess the practices of physicians in 12 European countries in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD).METHODS: In 2009, 806 physicians from 12 European countries answered a questionnaire, delivered electronically or by post, regarding their assessment of patients with cardiovascular risk factors, and their use of risk calculation tools and clinical practice guidelines (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00882336). Approximately 60 physicians per country were selected (participation rate varied between 3.1% in Sweden and 22.8% in Turkey).RESULTS: Among participating physicians, 85.2% reported using at least one clinical guideline for CVD prevention. The most popular were the ESC guidelines (55.1%). Reasons for not using guidelines included: the wide choice available (47.1%), time constraints (33.3%), lack of awareness of guidelines (27.5%), and perception that guidelines are unrealistic (23.5%). Among all physicians, 68.5% reported using global risk calculation tools. Written charts were the preferred method (69.4%) and the most commonly used was the SCORE equation (35.4%). Reasons for not using equations included time constraints (59.8%), not being convinced of their usefulness (21.7%) and lack of awareness (19.7%). Most physicians (70.8%) believed that global risk-equations have limitations; 89.8% that equations overlook important risk factors, and 66.5% that they could not be used in elderly patients. Only 46.4% of physicians stated that their local healthcare framework was sufficient for primary prevention of CVD, while 67.2% stated that it was sufficient for secondary prevention of CVD.CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of physicians reported using clinical guidelines for primary CVD prevention. However, time constraints, lack of perceived usefulness and inadequate knowledge were common reasons for not using CVD prevention guidelines or global CVD risk assessment tools.
|
|
