| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Lindskog, Magnus, et al.
(författare)
-
Overall survival in Swedish patients with renal cell carcinoma treated in the period 2002 to 2012: Update of the RENCOMP study with subgroup analysis of the synchronous metastatic and elderly populations
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Urologic Oncology-Seminars and Original Investigations. - : Elsevier BV. - 1078-1439 .- 1873-2496. ; 35:9, s. 541.e15-541.e22
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background: This retrospective study investigated overall survival (OS) and factors influencing OS in Swedish patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) during the pre- (2002-2005), early (2006-2008), and late (2009-2012) targeted therapy (TT) era. Methods: Three national Swedish registries identified patients with mRCC. Median OS was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis was performed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Subgroup analysis was conducted for patients with synchronous metastases (Ml) and the elderly (aged >= 75 y). Results: A total of 4,217 patients with mRCC were identified, including 1,533 patients with Ml and 1,275 elderly patients. For patients with mRCC diagnosed in 2002 to 2005, 2006 to 2008, and 2009 to 2012, median OS was 10.0, 13.0, and 18.0 months. Similarly, median OS improved in the M1 and elderly populations. Elderly patients were less likely to be prescribed TT (>= 75 vs. <75 y): 18.3 vs. 63.5% (in 2006-2008) and 28.6% vs. 55.9% (in 2009-2012). Diagnosis of mRCC in 2009 to 2012, nephrectomy and TT prescription were associated with improved OS in the total mRCC, Ml, and elderly populations. Conclusion: This real-world study showed continued significant improvement in mRCC OS during the late TT era, including in Ml and elderly populations. TT should be considered for all patients with mRCC based on tolerability, regardless of age. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 3. |
- Lindskog, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Overall survival (OS) in Swedish RCC patients treated 2000-2012: Update of the RENCOMP study.
- 2015
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 33:7
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- 413 Background: The RENal COMParison (RENCOMP) study showed a significant improvement in OS for Swedish patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and metastatic (m)RCC in the first years following the introduction of targeted agents (TAs) in 2006 (Br J Cancer 2013;108:1541). Here we investigated whether a further improvement in OS can be detected in the more recent years of the TA era. Methods: Using data from the Swedish Cancer Register (diagnosis and death records), National Patient Register (in-/out-patient visit records), and Swedish Prescribed Drug Register (prescribed/dispensed drug records), we assessed OS in RCC and mRCC patients diagnosed during two periods after (2009–2012 and 2006–2008) and one period before (2000–2005 [RCC]; 2002–2005 [mRCC]) the introduction of TAs, and factors influencing OS in mRCC. Multivariate analysis was performed using a Cox proportional hazards model, including estimates of adjusted HR. The regression model included the covariates age, gender, geographical region, institution size, nephrectomy status, diagnosis period, and TA prescription. Results: In total, 3,980, 2,956, and 5,225 RCC patients were identified from 2009–2012, 2006–2008, and 2000–2005, respectively. From 2002–2012, 4,217 patients met the criteria for mRCC diagnosis. RCC patients diagnosed 2009–2012 and 2006–2008 had a significant improvement in OS compared with patients diagnosed 2000–2005 (median OS: not reached and 86 vs. 48 months, respectively; both P<0.001 [log-rank]). Likewise, mRCC patients diagnosed 2009–2012 and 2006–2008 had a significant improvement in OS compared with patients diagnosed 2002–2005 (median OS: 18.0 and 13.0 vs. 10.0 months, respectively; both P<0.001 [log rank]; with adjusted HR [95% CI] of 0.76 [0.69–0.83] and 0.97 [0.89–1.06], respectively). Factors significantly associated with longer OS in mRCC were (HR, 95% CI): female gender (0.88, 0.82–0.94), lower age (0.97, 0.97–0.98), prior nephrectomy (0.57, 0.53–0.61), and a TA prescription (0.84, 0.77–0.91). Conclusions: A continued significant improvement in OS for RCC and mRCC patients was shown, reflecting intensified medical and surgical treatment, more available TAs, and increased clinical experience.
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
- Stenman, M, et al.
(författare)
-
Metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma: A retrospective study from two large academic centers in Sweden.
- 2016
-
Ingår i: JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY. - : American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO). - 0732-183X .- 1527-7755. ; 34:2
-
Konferensbidrag (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- 535 Background: Non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (nccRCC) constitute about 10-15% of all metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and typically include papillary, chromophobe and collecting duct histologies. Despite differences in clinical behavior between subtypes they are often grouped as one due to small patient numbers. Hence, there is a lack of knowledge on type-specific prognosis and treatment options. Methods: Patients diagnosed with metastatic nncRRC (56 out of 526 patients; 10.8%) during the years 2005-2013 were retrospectively identified using data from medical records at two large academic centers in Sweden. The characteristics and outcome of those with papillary subtype (n = 44; 79% of nccRCC) was analyzed. Results: Metastatic papillary RCC patients were more often male (82%), had a median age of 69 years and 48% had M1 disease. 9% were type I, 41% type II, 4% mixed and 41% papillary NOS. 89% had a nephrectomy and 56% received at least one line of systemic therapy. The median overall survival (OS) of all papillary patients was 10.1 months. Factors associated with OS included performance status (PS; OS 25.8 months for ECOG PS 0-1 patients vs OS 3.1 months for ECOG PS > 1 patients, p = 0.00002), and systemic therapy (OS 23.4 months vs 3.8 months for patients not treated systemically, p = 0.002). Systemic therapies (ST) included VEGF targeting agents (88%), mTOR inhibitors (50%), or interferon (21%) for all lines. The most common first line ST was VEGF targeting agents (75%). 42% received one line, 33% two lines, and 25% three or more lines of ST. Characteristics of patients treated with ST included lower age at diagnosis, higher proportion of M1 disease and better PS. The reasons for not giving systemic treatment were primarily poor performance status or comorbidities. ECOG PS > 1 (p = 0.04) and poor MSKCC risk group (p = 0.02) were predictive of OS among patients treated with ST. Conclusions: Patients with metastatic papillary RCC and good performance status (ECOG PS 0-1) seem to benefit from systemic therapy using drugs primarily evaluated for clear cell RCC. However, patients not eligible for systemic therapy due to poor performance status or other reasons have a dismal prognosis.
|
|
| 6. |
- Stenman, Maria, et al.
(författare)
-
Overall survival after stereotactic radiotherapy or surgical metastasectomy in oligometastatic renal cell carcinoma patients treated at two Swedish centres 2005-2014
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Radiotherapy and Oncology. - : ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD. - 0167-8140 .- 1879-0887. ; 127:3, s. 501-506
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Background and purpose: Investigate effects of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) or surgical metastasectomy (SM) on overall survival (OS) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) in the era of targeted agents (TA).Material and methods: mRCC patients (n = 117) treated with SRT (n = 57), SM (n = 30) or both modalities sequentially (n = 30) at two oncological centres in Sweden in 2005-2014 were retrospectively included. Median follow-up (mFU) was 63 months.Results: A majority had clear cell histology, 1-3 metastases, and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1. Two thirds had intermediate or poor risk and 44% synchronous metastases. 65% received TA. SRT patients were more likely to have adverse risk profiles. Median OS was 51 months without significant differences between SRT and SM. ECOG 1 vs 0 (HR 2.9; CI 1.6-5.2; p < 0.001), intracranial targets (HR 1.8; CI 1.1-3.2; p = 0.03) and watchful waiting >18 months prior to treatment (HR 0.3; CI 0.2-0.6; p = 0.001) were independently associated with OS. 15% of curatively treated patients (n = 60) were relapse-free with mFU of 87 months.Conclusions: OS after SRT was comparable to SM and longer than expected considering patients with adverse risk profiles were common. Fit patients with non-brain metastases treated after an initial period of watchful waiting had the best prognosis.
|
|
