1. |
- Farago, Adam, 1984, et al.
(author)
-
Cognitive Skills and Economic Preferences in the Fund Industry*
- 2022
-
In: Economic Journal. - : Oxford University Press (OUP). - 0013-0133 .- 1468-0297. ; 132:645, s. 1737-1764
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We investigate the impact of cognitive skills and economic preferences on fund managers' professional decisions by running a battery of experiments with them. First, we find that fund managers' risk tolerance positively correlates with fund risk when accounting for fund benchmark, fund category and other controls. Second, we show that fund managers' ambiguity tolerance positively correlates with the funds' tracking error from the benchmark. Finally, we report that cognitive skills do not explain fund performance in terms of excess returns. However, we do find that fund managers with high cognitive reflection abilities compose funds at lower risk.
|
|
2. |
- Holmen, Martin, 1976, et al.
(author)
-
Economic Preferences and Personality Traits Among Finance Professionals and the General Population
- 2023
-
In: Economic Journal. - 0013-0133 .- 1468-0297. ; 133:656
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Based on artefactual field experiments, we investigate whether finance professionals differ from a sample of the working population in terms of industry-relevant preferences and personality traits. When adjusting for socioeconomic characteristics, we find only few and less marked differences: finance professionals are less risk averse, less trustworthy, show higher levels of psychopathy and are more competitive than participants from the general population. In an additional survey, experts with hiring experience consider industry selection, self-selection and imprinting by industry norms as explanatory for the observed subject pool differences.
|
|
3. |
- Kirchler, Michael, 1977, et al.
(author)
-
Delegated investment decisions and rankings
- 2020
-
In: Journal of Banking & Finance. - : Elsevier BV. - 0378-4266. ; 120
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Two aspects of social context are central to the finance industry. First, financial professionals usually make investment decisions on behalf of third parties. Second, social competition, in the form of performance rankings, is pervasive. Therefore, we investigate professionals' risk taking behavior under social competition when investing for others. We run online and lab-in-the-field experiments with 805 financial professionals and show that professionals increase their risk taking for others when they lag behind. Additional survey evidence from 1349 respondents reveals that professionals' preferences for high rankings are significantly stronger than those of the general population. (C) 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
|
|
4. |
- Razen, M., et al.
(author)
-
Domain-specific risk-taking among finance professionals
- 2020
-
In: Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance. - : Elsevier BV. - 2214-6350. ; 27
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Risk-assessment and risk-taking in various forms are among the most important tasks financial professionals face in their daily work. A large body of experimental studies has shown a substantial effect of the decision domain (gain vs loss domain) on risk-taking, predominantly among students. In a series of experiments set in different contextual frameworks, we investigate whether this domain effect is also present among experienced employees in the finance industry and compare their decisions with people from the general population. Our results show that employees in the finance industry are equally prone to the domain effect in risk-taking than the general population. Interestingly, for domain-specific risk-taking in a finance context, we find that professionals are even more reluctant to sell loser stocks than non-professionals. © 2020 The Authors
|
|
5. |
- Schwaiger, R., et al.
(author)
-
Determinants of investor expectations and satisfaction. A study with financial professionals
- 2020
-
In: Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. - : Elsevier BV. - 0165-1889. ; 110
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- We investigate determinants of price expectations and satisfaction levels of financial professionals and students. In experiments with 150 professionals and 576 students, we systematically vary price paths according to the final return (positive or negative) and the way in which the final return is achieved (upswing followed by downswing or vice versa). Professionals show the most optimistic price expectations and are most satisfied if assets fall in price first and then recover. In addition, professionals’ price expectations are highest after positive returns. Among students, qualitatively similar patterns emerge, but professionals’ price expectations are less prone to framing effects. © 2019 The Author(s)
|
|
6. |
- Sutter, M., et al.
(author)
-
Where to look for the morals in markets?
- 2020
-
In: Experimental Economics. - : Springer Science and Business Media LLC. - 1386-4157 .- 1573-6938. ; 23:1, s. 30-52
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- There is a heated debate on whether markets erode social responsibility and moral behavior. However, it is a challenging task to identify and measure moral behavior in markets. Based on a theoretical model, we examine in an experiment the relation between trading volume, prices and moral behavior by setting up markets that either impose a negative externality on third parties or not. We find that moral behavior reveals itself in lower trading volume in markets with a negative externality, while prices mostly depend on the market structure. We further investigate individual characteristics that explain trading behavior in markets with negative externalities.
|
|