| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
- Bakris, George L, et al.
(författare)
-
Design and Baseline Characteristics of the Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease Trial.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: American Journal of Nephrology. - : S. Karger AG. - 0250-8095 .- 1421-9670. ; 50:5, s. 333-344
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Among diabetics, those with kidney disease have exceptionally high rates of cardiovascular (CV) morbidity and mortality, and progression of their underlying disease. Finerenone is a novel, non-steroidal, selective mineralocorticoid-receptor antagonist which has shown to reduce albuminuria in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), while revealing only a low risk of hyperkalemia. However, the effect of finerenone on renal and CV outcomes has not been investigated in long-term trials yet.METHODS: The Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease -(FIDELIO-DKD) trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of finerenone compared to placebo at reducing clinically important renal and CV outcomes in T2D patients with CKD. FIDELIO-DKD is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, event-driven trial running in 47 countries with an expected duration of approximately 5.5 years. FIDELIO-DKD randomized 5,734 patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≥25-<75 mL/min/1.73 m2 and albuminuria (urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio ≥30-≤5,000 mg/g). The study has at least 90% power to detect a 20% reduction in the risk of primary outcome (overall two-sided significance level α = 0.05), the composite of time to first occurrence of kidney failure, a sustained decrease of eGFR ≥40% from baseline over at least 4 weeks, or renal death.CONCLUSION: FIDELIO-DKD will determine whether an optimally treated cohort of T2D patients with CKD at high risk of renal and CV events will experience cardiorenal benefits with the addition of finerenone to their treatment regimen.
|
|
| 5. |
- Dewan, Pooja, et al.
(författare)
-
Sex-Related Differences in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Circulation. Heart failure. - 1941-3297. ; 12:12
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- To describe characteristics and outcomes in women and men with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction.Baseline characteristics (including biomarkers and quality of life) and outcomes (primary outcome: composite of first heart failure hospitalization or cardiovascular death) were compared in 4458 women and 4010 men enrolled in CHARM-Preserved (Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity) (EF≥45%), I-Preserve (Irbesartan in heart failure with Preserved ejection fraction), and TOPCAT-Americas (Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist trial).Women were older and more often obese and hypertensive but less likely to have coronary artery disease or atrial fibrillation. Women had more symptoms and signs of congestion and worse quality of life. Despite this, the risk of the primary outcome was lower in women (hazard ratio, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.73-0.88]), as was the risk of cardiovascular death (hazard ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.62-0.80]), but there was no difference in the rate for first hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.82-1.02]). The lower risk of cardiovascular death in women, compared with men, was in part explained by a substantially lower risk of sudden death (hazard ratio, 0.53 [0.43-0.65]; P<0.001). E/A ratio was lower in women (1.1 versus 1.2).There are significant differences between women and men with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Despite worse symptoms, more congestion, and lower quality of life, women had similar rates of hospitalization and better survival than men. Their risk of sudden death was half that of men.URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00853658, NCT01035255.
|
|
| 6. |
- Rossignol, Patrick, et al.
(författare)
-
Impact of eplerenone on cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure patients with hypokalaemia
- 2017
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : Wiley. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 19:6, s. 792-799
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- © 2016 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure © 2016 European Society of Cardiology Aims: Although hypokalaemia is common among patients with heart failure (HF), the prognostic significance of baseline hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia during follow-up in HF patients receiving a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) remains uncertain. Methods and results: Results of the EMPHASIS-HF trial in patients (n = 2737) with HF and reduced EF with mild symptoms, randomized to eplerenone or placebo, were analysed with regard to the presence or occurrence of hypokalaemia (serum K + < 4.0 mmol/L) and the risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for HF (primary endpoint). Median follow-up was 21 months. Baseline hypokalaemia and hypokalaemia during follow-up were common occurrences (19.6% and 40.6%, respectively). Hypokalaemia during follow-up was associated with worse outcomes in multivariable analyses [hazard ratio (HR) 1.26, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.52, P = 0.01] without evidence of interaction with eplerenone. In contrast, baseline hypokalaemia was associated with outcomes in the placebo group (HR 1.37, 95% CI 1.05–1.79, P = 0.02) but not in the eplerenone group (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.62–1.23, P = 0.44; P for interaction = 0.04). Concurrently, eplerenone was found to be more protective in patients with baseline hypokalaemia vs. patients without baseline hypokalaemia compared with placebo (HR 0.44, 95% 0.30–0.64, P < 0.0001 vs. 0.69, 95% CI 0.57–0.83, P = 0.0001; P for interaction = 0.04). In patients without baseline hypokalaemia, eplerenone use decreased the rate of hypokalaemia during follow-up (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.59–0.80, P < 0.001). A potassium level > 4.0 mmol/L at 1 month after randomization mediated 26.0% (0.6–51.4%) of the eplerenone treatment effect (P = 0.04). Conclusion: In HF patients receiving optimal therapy but not treated with eplerenone, baseline hypokalaemia was associated with worse outcomes. Conversely, hypokalaemia amplified the treatment effect of eplerenone.
|
|
| 7. |
- Savarese, Gianluigi, et al.
(författare)
-
Association between renin-angiotensin system inhibitor use and mortality/morbidity in elderly patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a prospective propensity score matched cohort study
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European Heart Journal. - : OXFORD UNIV PRESS. - 0195-668X .- 1522-9645. ; 39:48, s. 4257-4265
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Aims In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), renin angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) improve morbidity and mortality. However, patients aged amp;gt;80 years constituted a small minority in trials. We assessed the association between RASi use and mortality/morbidity in HFrEF patients aged amp;gt;80 years. Methods and results We included patients with ejection fraction amp;lt;40% and age amp;gt;80 years from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry. Propensity scores for RASi use were calculated from 37 variables. Cox regression models for RASi vs. non-RASi with all-cause mortality and all-cause mortality/heart failure (HF) hospitalization as outcomes were fitted in a 1:1 propensity-score-matched cohort. To assess consistency, the same analyses were performed in a positive control cohort aged amp;lt;= 80 years. Of 6710 patients [median age (interquartile range) 85 (82-87) years; 38% women], 5384 (80%) received RASi. Propensity-score matching yielded 2416 patients, [age 86 (83-91) years]. RASi use was associated with hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) 0.78 (0.72-0.86) for all-cause mortality and 0.86 (0.79-0.94) for all-cause mortality/HF hospitalization. In positive control patients aged amp;lt;= 80 years (17 842 patients in the overall cohort, 2126 after matching), HR for all-cause mortality was 0.81 (0.71-0.91), whereas it was 0.85 (0.76-0.94) for all-cause mortality/HF hospitalization. Conclusion In HFrEF patients with age amp;gt;80years, RASi were relatively underused compared with in younger patients, despite similar association with reduced morbidity and mortality and no apparent association with risk of syncope-related hospitalization. These results may be interpreted as hypothesis generating for randomized clinical trials on RASi in this elderly HFrEF subpopulation.
|
|
| 8. |
- Savarese, Gianluigi, et al.
(författare)
-
Factors associated with underuse of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction : an analysis of 11 215 patients from the Swedish Heart Failure Registry
- 2018
-
Ingår i: European Journal of Heart Failure. - : John Wiley & Sons. - 1388-9842 .- 1879-0844. ; 20:9, s. 1326-1334
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- AIM: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) improve outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), but are underutilized. Hyperkalaemia may be one reason, but the underlying reasons for underuse are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the independent predictors of MRA underuse in a large and unselected HFrEF cohort.METHODS AND RESULTS: We included patients with HFrEF (ejection fraction <40%), New York Heart Association (NYHA) class II-IV and heart failure (HF) duration ≥6 months from the Swedish HF Registry. Logistic regression analysis identified independent associations between 39 demographic, clinical, co-treatment, and socioeconomic predictors and MRA non-use. Of 11 215 patients, 27% were women; mean age was 75 ± 11 years; only 4443 (40%) patients received MRA. Selected characteristics independently associated with MRA non-use were in descending order of magnitude: lower creatinine clearance (<60 mL/min), no need for diuretics, no cardiac resynchronization therapy/implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, higher blood pressure, no digoxin use, higher ejection fraction, outpatient setting, older age, lower income, ischaemic heart disease, male sex, follow-up in primary vs. specialty care, lower NYHA class, and absence of hypertension diagnosis. Plasma potassium and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels were not associated with MRA non-use.CONCLUSION: Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists remain underused in HFrEF. Their use does not decrease with elevated potassium but does with impaired renal function, even in the creatinine clearance 30-59.9 mL/min range where MRAs are not contraindicated. MRA underuse may be further related to non-specialist care, milder HF and no use of other HF therapy.
|
|
| 9. |
- Savarese, Gianluigi, et al.
(författare)
-
Incidence, Predictors, and Outcome Associations of Dyskalemia in Heart Failure With Preserved, Mid-Range, and Reduced Ejection Fraction
- 2019
-
Ingår i: JACC. Heart failure. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 2213-1779 .- 2213-1787. ; 7:1, s. 65-76
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVES This study investigated 1-year incidence and predictors of dyskalemia (dysK) and its outcome associations in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), HF with mid-range EF (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). BACKGROUND DysK in real-world HF is insufficiently characterized. Fear of dyskalemia may lead to underuse or underdosing of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors. METHODS Patients enrolled in the SwedeHF (Swedish Heart Failure) Registry from 2006 to 2011 in Stockholm, Sweden were included in the analyses. Multivariate Cox regression analysis identified independent predictors of dysK within 1 year. Time-dependent Cox models assessed outcomes associated with incident dysK (all-cause death, HF, and other cardiovascular disease [CVD] hospitalizations) within 1 year from baseline. RESULTS Of 5,848 patients, 24.4% experienced hyperkalemia (hyperK [K amp;gt; 5.0 mmol/l]) at least once, and 10.2% had moderate or severe hyperK (K amp;gt; 5.5 mmol/l). Adjusted risk of moderate or severe hyperK was highest in HFpEF and HFmrEF. Similarly, 20.3% of patients had at least one episode of hypokalemia (hypoK [amp;lt;3.5 mmol/l]), and 3.7% had severe hypoK (amp;lt;3.0 mmol/l). Adjusted risk of any hypoK was highest in HFpEF. Independent predictors of both hyperK and hypoK were sex, baseline potassium and estimated glomerular filtration rate, low hemoglobin, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), inpatient status, and higher New York Heart Association functional class. Incident dysK was associated with increased risk of mortality. Furthermore, hypoK was associated with increased CVD hospitalizations (HF-related excluded). There was no association between dysK and HF hospitalization risk, regardless of EF. CONCLUSIONS DysK is common in HF and is associated with increased mortality. Risk of moderate or severe hyperK was highest in HFpEF and HFmrEF, whereas risk of hypoK was highest in HFpEF. HF severity, low hemoglobin, COPD, baseline high and low potassium, and low eGFR were relevant predictors of dysK occurrence. (C) 2019 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation.
|
|
