| 1. |
- Argüello Moncayo, Gabriela, 1983
(författare)
-
International law on ship recycling and its interface with EU law
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Marine Pollution Bulletin. - : Elsevier BV. - 0025-326X. ; 109:1, s. 301-309
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The regulation on ship recycling at international and European Union (EU) level has transitioned from the realm of transboundary movement of wastes to a specialized regime, i.e., the Hong Kong International Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships (2009) (Hong Kong Convention). Although this convention is not in force yet, the principal features of it have been incorporated in EU Regulation 1257/2013 on ship recycling. This paper examines the rationale behind developing a ship recycling regime, its disassociation from wastes, and the departure from the main principles of transboundary movement of wastes, such as the proximity principle, reduction of transboundary movement of wastes, and the prior informed consent procedure. While acknowledging some of the positive features of the emerging ship recycling, it is submitted that the Hong Kong Convention and EU Regulation 1257/2013 on ship recycling represent a step back in the regulation of ship recycling.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Heidbrink, Jakob, 1971
(författare)
-
Gymnasieamnestin: Juridiken spänner musklerna
- 2018
-
Ingår i: Kvartal. - 2002-6269.
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- Förvaltningsrätten i Malmö underkände i fredags den så kallade gymnasieamnestin, som ger 9 000 personer utan asylskäl rätt att stanna i landet. Lagrådet har tidigare slagit fast att samma lag utarbetats på ett undermåligt sätt. Det innebär att den svenska juridiken på ett förmodligen aldrig tidigare skådat sätt har tagit strid med politiken om en lag. Det är en sensation, med potentiellt stora konstitutionella implikationer.
|
|
| 4. |
- Käll, Jannice, 1985
(författare)
-
A Posthuman Data Subject? The Right to Be Forgotten and Beyond
- 2017
-
Ingår i: German Law Journal. - 2071-8322. ; 18:5, s. 1145-1162
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The general assumption in the West is that there still is an inherent difference between persons and things. This divide informs how “the human” and human subjectivity are constructed as distinct from all others. Recently, the distinction has been challenged in posthumanist theory, where it has been argued that the divide between human and nonhuman agents—or rather, bodies—is always an effect of a differential set of powers. For this reason, the boundaries between human and nonhuman are always in flux. As posthumanist theorists have argued, this change in boundaries may be specifically visualized in relation to digital technology. Today, such technologies obfuscate the boundaries between persons and things, and the extensive utilization of smartphones, social media, and online search engines are just three common examples. In parallel to the continuous expansion of digital technologies, critical understandings of how “data” and human personhood are produced are increasingly raised in legal theory. Recent developments establishing increased privacy online through EU law, including the new General Data Protection Regulation and the famous Right to Be Forgotten case could possibly be understood to have struck a balance between interests of the human–in the form of privacy—and the digital—in the form of information diffusion. In this Article, a posthumanist theoretical perspective is utilized to show how the new data protection legislation, with a focus on the Right to Be Forgotten, produces such protection yet continuously withdraws data as a separate body from human bodies. For this reason, it is argued that the construction of new human rights, such as those considering data protection, would benefit from understanding how the separation is, in itself, an effect of advanced capitalism.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Lidman, Erik, 1991
(författare)
-
Nordic Cooperation on the Implementation of EU Company Law
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Nordisk Tidsskrift for Selskabsret. - 1399-140X. ; 2019:4, s. 1-5
-
Tidskriftsartikel (övrigt vetenskapligt/konstnärligt)abstract
- In 2019, Nordisk Tidsskrift for Selskabsret has been published for 25 years. To celebrate the anniversary, a conference was held in Copenhagen on October 4, where some 70 participants – academics, regulators and practitioners from all of the Nordic countries – met under festive circumstances to discuss the Nordic cooperation on the implementation of the EU Company law. During the conference, professor Paul Krüger Andersen’s hard work of establishing the journal was also commemorated. This report documents the conference overarching discussions.
|
|
| 7. |
- Papadopoulou, Frantzeska, 1977-
(författare)
-
Supplementary Protection Certificates : still a grey area?
- 2016
-
Ingår i: Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. - : Oxford University Press. - 1747-1532 .- 1747-1540. ; 11:5, s. 372-381
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Supplementary Protection Certificates (SPCs) were introduced in 1992, and have since been considered a very valuable tool for the pharmaceutical industry, allowing for market prolongation and compensating for the effective patent protection time lost in the process of market authorization.Over the past five years, numerous Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) rulings have attempted to interpret the provisions of EU Regulation 1901/2009 and provide clarity to patent holders as well as generics manufacturers as to the protection requirements and the scope of protection awarded. This article analyses the implication of major CJEU cases concerning the interpretation of Articles 3(a), 3(d) and 1(b) of the Regulation.The article also discusses the interrelation between the EU SPC Regulation, on the one hand, and the Market Authorization Regulation and the Market Authorization Directive, on the other, and compares the EU system with that provided by the USA. An analysis of recent case law reveals that now, some 25 years after the entry into force of the Regulation, the system is still obscure. A serious concern also arises as to whether the system as it stands today is simply inappropriate to the protection of modern pharmaceuticals and whether this is also one of the reasons for the growing volume of case law in the field.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Öberg, Jacob, 1982-
(författare)
-
Subsidiarity and EU Procedural Criminal Law
- 2015
-
Ingår i: European Criminal Law Review. - Oxford : Hart Publishing Ltd. - 2191-7442 .- 2193-5505. ; 5:1, s. 19-45
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- This article examines how subsidiarity can limit the exercise of EU procedural criminal law competence. It argues for a narrow understanding of subsidiarity, suggesting that EU procedural criminal law legislation can only be directed at problems which are of a cross-border nature. By analysing a specific piece of EU legislation, the new Victims Directive, it is shown how the subsidiarity principle can be enforced. The article sustains that the Victims Directive can be criticised on subsidiarity grounds as the directive fails to adequately account for the link between victim rights and the application of the principle of mutual recognition, since the directive fails to explain properly the need to regulate local victim rights. The article also draws some broader reflections on the justifications for EU harmonization. It is argued that EU initiatives in procedural criminal law have not primarily been driven by the need to facilitate mutual recognition and free movement but rather motivated by a general concern to deliver a common European sense of justice. Whilst this approach from the EU legislator can be justified from a moral perspective, it flies in the face of the idea that decisions should be taken as closely as possible in respect of citizens.
|
|
