| 1. |
- Carpentier, Nico, 1969-
(author)
-
Além da escada da participação : Ferramentas analíticas para a análise crítica dos processos midiáticos participativos
- 2018
-
In: Mídia e Cotidiano, Revista do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Mídia e Cotidiano. - : Pro Reitoria de Pesquisa, Pos Graduacao e Inovacao - UFF. - 2178-602X. ; 12:3, s. 245-274
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Participatory research is facing three challenges—how to deal with the theoretisation and conceptualisation of participation; how to support the research with analytical models; and how the evaluate the research outcomes. This article aims to address these three problems by distinguishing two main approaches (a sociological and a political) in participatory theory and developing a four-level and 12-step analytical model that functions within the political approach. In this analytical model, a series of key concepts are used: process, field, actor, decision-making moment and power. The normative-evaluative problem is addressed by reverting to the critical perspective to evaluate the societal desirability of particular participatory intensities. This critical perspective—potentially—adds a 13th and final normative layer to the analytical model.
|
|
| 2. |
- Carpentier, Nico, 1969-
(author)
-
Comunicando o conhecimento acadêmico além do texto acadêmico escrito : uma análise autoetnográfica do experimento da instalação Mirror Palace of Democracy
- 2020
-
In: MATRIZes. - 1982-2073 .- 1982-8160. ; 14:2, s. 75-99
-
Journal article (other academic/artistic)abstract
- The article first discusses five approaches that aim to transcend, complement, or overturn the hegemony of the written academic text. In the second part, the Mirror Palace of Democracy installation experiment, which had the explicit objective of moving beyond the written academic text while still remaining in the realm of academic knowledge communication, is autoethnographically analyzed. The experiment allowed reflection on the integrated and iterative nature of academic communication, on the hybrid academic– artistic identity, and on the diversification of publics. Both the theoretical discussion and the Mirror Palace of Democracy installation are part of a call for more experimentation with, and theorization of, multimodal and/or arts-based academic communication.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
