| 1. |
- Clarke, Emily L., et al.
(författare)
-
Development and Evaluation of a Novel Point-of-Use Quality Assurance Tool for Digital Pathology
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. - : COLL AMER PATHOLOGISTS. - 0003-9985 .- 1543-2165. ; 143:10, s. 1246-1255
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context.-Flexible working at diverse or remote sites is a major advantage when reporting using digital pathology, but currently there is no method to validate the clinical diagnostic setting within digital microscopy. Objective.-To develop a preliminary Point-of-Use Quality Assurance (POUQA) tool designed specifically to validate the diagnostic setting for digital microscopy. Design.-We based the POUQA tool on the red, green, and blue (RGB) values of hematoxylin-eosin. The tool used 144 hematoxylin-eosin-colored, 5x5-cm patches with a superimposed random letter with subtly lighter RGB values from the background color, with differing levels of difficulty. We performed an initial evaluation across 3 phases within 2 pathology departments: 1 in the United Kingdom and 1 in Sweden. Results.-In total, 53 experiments were conducted across all phases resulting in 7632 test images viewed in all. Results indicated that the display, the users visual system, and the environment each independently impacted performance. Performance was improved with reduction in natural light and through use of medical-grade displays. Conclusions.-The use of a POUQA tool for digital microscopy is essential to afford flexible working while ensuring patient safety. The color-contrast test provides a standardized method of comparing diagnostic settings for digital microscopy. With further planned development, the color-contrast test may be used to create a "Verified Login" for diagnostic setting validation.
|
|
| 2. |
- Williams, Bethany J., et al.
(författare)
-
A Systematic Analysis of Discordant Diagnoses in Digital Pathology Compared With Light Microscopy
- 2017
-
Ingår i: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. - : COLL AMER PATHOLOGISTS. - 0003-9985 .- 1543-2165. ; 141:12, s. 1712-1718
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Context.-Relatively little is known about the significance and potential impact of glass-digital discordances, and this is likely to be of importance when considering digital pathology adoption. Objective.-To apply evidence-based medicine to collect and analyze reported instances of glass-digital discordance from the whole slide imaging validation literature. Design.-We used our prior systematic review protocol to identify studies assessing the concordance of light microscopy and whole slide imaging between 1999 and 2015. Data were extracted and analyzed by a team of histopathologists to classify the type, significance, and potential root cause of discordances. Results.-Twenty-three studies were included, yielding 8069 instances of a glass diagnosis being compared with a digital diagnosis. From these 8069 comparisons, 335 instances of discordance (4%) were reported, in which glass was the preferred diagnostic medium in 286 (85%), and digital in 44 (13%), with no consensus in 5 (2%). Twenty-eight discordances had the potential to cause moderate/severe patient harm. Of these, glass was the preferred diagnostic medium for 26 (93%). Of the 335 discordances, 109 (32%) involved the diagnosis or grading of dysplasia. For these cases, glass was the preferred diagnostic medium in 101 cases (93%), suggesting that diagnosis and grading of dysplasia may be a potential pitfall of digital diagnosis. In 32 of 335 cases (10%), discordance on digital was attributed to the inability to find a small diagnostic/prognostic object. Conclusions.-Systematic analysis of concordance studies reveals specific areas that may be problematic on whole slide imaging. It is important that pathologists are aware of these areas to ensure patient safety.
|
|
| 3. |
|
|
| 4. |
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Seethala, R. R., et al.
(författare)
-
Data Set for the Reporting of Carcinomas of the Major Salivary Glands: Explanations and Recommendations of the Guidelines From the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting
- 2019
-
Ingår i: Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine. - 0003-9985. ; 143:5, s. 578-586
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- The International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting is a nonprofit organization whose goal is to develop evidence-based, internationally agreed-upon standardized data sets for each anatomic site, to be used throughout the world. Providing global standardization of pathology tumor classification, staging, and other reporting elements will lead to achieving the objective of improved patient management and enhanced epidemiologic research. Salivary gland carcinomas are relatively uncommon, and as such, meaningful data about the many histologic types are not easily compared. Morphologic overlap between tumor types makes accurate classification challenging, but there are often significant differences in patient outcomes. Therefore, issues related to tumor type, tumor grading, high-grade transformation, extent of invasion, number and size of nerves affected, and types of ancillary studies are discussed in the context of daily application to specimens from these organs. This review focuses on the data set developed for salivary gland carcinomas with discussion of the key core and noncore elements developed for inclusion by an international expert panel of head and neck and oralmaxillofacial pathologists and surgeons.
|
|
