| 1. |
- Spiliopoulou Åkermark, Sia
(författare)
-
Storms, Foxes, and Nebulous Legal Arguments : Twelve Years of Force against Iraq, 1991-2003
- 2005
-
Ingår i: International and Comparative Law Quarterly. - : Cambridge University Press. - 0020-5893 .- 1471-6895. ; 54:1, s. 221-235
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Vaughan Lowe has recently argued that the most important task of international lawyers at times of flux is to identify claims with precision.1 In order to accomplish this task with regard to the issue of use of force in Iraq, it seems necessary to review the main American and British arguments, including the formal legal arguments presented, as well as the relevant reactions of other States over a longer period of time. This will allow us to reveal patterns of argumentation, similarities, and differences in the American and British justifications as well as in the responses of the international community.
|
|
| 2. |
- Almqvist, Jessica
(författare)
-
A Human Rights Qritique of European Judicial Review: Counter-terrorism Sanctions
- 2008
-
Ingår i: International and Comparative Law Quarterly. - 0020-5893. ; , s. 303-331
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Litigation involving individuals and entities whose financial assets have been frozen and whose names have been blacklisted in the fight against terrorism is on the rise around the world. However, the global ‘securitization’ of terrorism has rendered court performance of judicial review and the provision of remedies in these cases more difficult. What the main judicial challenges are, the need to overcome them, and how they can be overcome, are identified in this article as questions of central concern in an effort to secure the human right of effective access to justice for persons subjected to counter-terrorism sanctions. Special attention is given to the specific challenges facing the Court of Justice in the European Communities, the manner in which it has responded, and outstanding issues.
|
|
