| 1. |
- Beukes, Eldre W., et al.
(författare)
-
Development and psychometric validation of a questionnaire assessing the impact of tinnitus on significant others
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Communication Disorders. - : ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC. - 0021-9924 .- 1873-7994. ; 95
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Despite evidence showing that tinnitus can have a detrimental impact on significant others (SOs), no standardized self-reported measure is currently available that specifically as-sesses the presence of third-party disability for tinnitus. The aim of this study was to develop and assess the psychometric properties of a newly developed self-reported measure for SOs of tinnitus and assess how scores could be meaningfully interpreted. Methods: The research consisted of two phases. During Phase I, the Consequences of Tinnitus on Significant Others Questionnaire (CTSOQ) was developed using the The COnsensus-based Stan-dards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidance. Phase II included the assessment of psychometric properties of the CTSOQ including the construct validity, internal consistency, interpretability, and responsiveness. Pairs of 194 individuals with tinnitus and their SOs completed a series of online questionnaires. SOs completed the CTSOQ measure while in-dividuals with tinnitus completed measures related to tinnitus distress, anxiety, depression, insomnia, and quality of life. Results: A 25 item CTSOQ was developed using a formative model. The questionnaire validation process indicated good psychometric properties with an internal consistency of 0.93 and inter-item correlation of 0.60. Support was found for the construct and discriminative validity of the measure. Floor and ceiling effects were negligible. Scores can be meaningfully interpreted to indicate mild, significant, or severe effect of tinnitus on SOs. The questionnaire was also found to be responsive to treatment-related changes. Conclusions: The CTSOQ was found to have sufficient measurement properties suggesting that it is a suitable measure of third-party disability for SOs of individuals with tinnitus. Further research should be initiated to measure face validity and what scores reflect clinically meaningful change.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Kristensson, Joana, 1972, et al.
(författare)
-
Naming vs. non-naming treatment in aphasia in a group setting–A randomized controlled trial
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Communication Disorders. - : Elsevier BV. - 0021-9924 .- 1873-7994. ; 97
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Introduction: Anomia affects numerous persons with aphasia. Treatment effects of anomia group therapy have been reported, but the evidence is not comprehensive. This study aimed to explore treatment effects of a naming treatment compared with a non-naming treatment delivered in a group setting. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial, 17 participants with chronic poststroke aphasia underwent group therapy, 2 hours a session, 3 times per week, for a total of 20 hours. The treatment given in the naming group was modified semantic feature analysis (SFA). Treatment content in the non-naming group comprised auditory comprehension, copying text, and reading. The primary outcome measure was accuracy in confrontation naming of participant-selected trained nouns and verbs. Generalization effects were evaluated in single-word naming, connected speech, and everyday communication. Results: Participants in both groups significantly improved their naming of trained items. There were no differences between the groups. The treatment effect did not remain at follow-up 10 weeks after therapy. No other statistically significant changes occurred in either group. Conclusions: Group intervention can improve naming ability in individuals with chronic aphasia. However, similar treatment effects can be achieved using a non-naming treatment as using a naming treatment, such as modified SFA. Further research is warranted to identify the most important elements of anomia group therapy.
|
|
| 4. |
- Lagerberg, Tove B, et al.
(författare)
-
Measuring intelligibility in spontaneous speech using syllables perceived as understood
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Journal of communication disorders. - : Elsevier BV. - 1873-7994 .- 0021-9924. ; 92
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Intelligibility, the ability to convey a message by speech, is one of the most important variables in speech-language pathology. The assessment of intelligibility is a challenge especially when it comes to spontaneous speech. The aim of the study was to investigate validity and reliability of a method for assessment of intelligibility, syllables perceived as understood (SPU); a method that is more time-efficient than previous methods based on transcription, as it does not require a master transcript for reference.A group of 20 adult listeners transcribed stimuli consisting of spontaneous speech from 16 children (14 with speech sound disorder and two with typical speech and language development, age 4:4 to 8:1, M=6:0). Intelligibility was calculated based on these orthographic transcripts, as a) proportion of syllables perceived as understood (SPU) and b) proportion of syllables correctly understood (SCU), with reference to a master transcript. Validity was checked through investigation of the correlation and difference between these two measures. Reliability was analysed with inter-listener reliability by intra-class correlation.The correlation between SPU and SCU (the gold standard intelligibility score) was strong and statistically significant, with SPU being consistently higher than SCU. Inter-listener reliability for single measures of intra-class correlation of the assessment by syllables perceived as understood was moderate to low, whereas the inter-listener reliability for average measures of intra-class correlation was high.The method based on SPU might be used for assessment of intelligibility if the median from several listeners is used or when comparing results from the same listener over time. The SPU method might therefore be a valuable tool in a clinical and research context as a more valid option than rating scales and a more time-efficient method than the gold standard SCU method. However, it should be noted that the reliability of the SPU is not as high as for the SCU.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
|
|
| 7. |
- Socher, Michaela, et al.
(författare)
-
Comparing the semantic networks of children with cochlear implants and children with typical hearing: Effects of length of language access
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Journal of Communication Disorders. - : Elsevier. - 0021-9924 .- 1873-7994. ; 99
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- PurposeKenett et al. (2013) report that the sematic networks, measured by using an oral semantic fluency task, of children with cochlear implants (CI) are less structured compared to the sematic networks of children with typical hearing (TH). This study aims to evaluate if such differences are only evident if children with CI are compared to children with TH matched on chronological age, or also if they are compared to children with TH matched on hearing age.MethodThe performance of a group of children with CI on a verbal fluency task was compared to the performance of a group of chronological-age matched children with TH. Subsequently, computational network analysis was used to compare the semantic network structure of the groups. The same procedure was applied to compare a group of children with CI to a group of hearing-age matched children with TH.ResultsThe children with CI perform on the same level on an oral semantic verbal fluency task as the children with TH matched on hearing age. There are significant differences in terms of the structure of the semantic network between the groups. The magnitude of these differences is very small and they are non-significant for a proportion of nodes included in the bootstrap analysis. This indicates that there is no true difference between the networks. Hearing age, but not age at implantation was found to be significantly positively correlated with semantic verbal fluency performance for the children with CI.ConclusionsThe results from the current study indicate that length of language exposure is an important factor for the structure of the semantic network and the performance on a semantic verbal fluency task for children with CI. Further studies are needed to explore the role of the accessibility of the language input for the development of semantic networks of children with CI.
|
|
| 8. |
- Strombergsson, S., et al.
(författare)
-
Audience Response System-Based Evaluation of Intelligibility of Children's Connected Speech - Validity, Reliability and Listener Differences
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Journal of Communication Disorders. - : Elsevier BV. - 0021-9924 .- 1873-7994. ; 87
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Purpose: We assessed audience response systems (ARS)-based evaluation of intelligibility, with a view to find a valid and reliable intelligibility measure that is accessible to non-trained participants. In addition, we investigated potential listener differences between pediatric speech and language pathologists (SLPs) and untrained adults. Method: Sixteen one-minute samples of connected speech were compiled, collected from 14 children with a speech sound disorder (SSD) and two children with typical speech. 16 SLPs and 13 untrained adults participated in a series of ARS listening sessions, where they were fitted with headphones and hand controls, and instructed to click a button whenever they did not understand the child speaking. Listeners' button clicks were registered and, for each speech sample, totaled into an (un)intelligibility index. The proportion of syllables perceived correctly - based on orthographic listener transcripts - was used as a reference score of intelligibility. Results: The ARS-based intelligibility scores correlated strongly with the intelligibility reference score. Reliability was high across listener groups and weaker for single listeners. No significant difference was found between the evaluations of SLPs and untrained adults. Conclusions: ARS-based evaluation offers a valid and reliable measure of intelligibility of particular value in research as a practical tool for collecting input from listeners without experience or knowledge of SSDs. We stress that the ARS design presupposes a listener panel, and that evaluations obtained from individual listeners are predictably inadequate in terms of reliability.
|
|
