Singular Intellection in Medieval Commentaries on Aristotle's De anima

• Discussions about singular cognition, and its linguistic counterpart, are by no means exclusive to contemporary philosophy. In fact, a strikingly similar discussion, to which several medieval texts bear witness, took place in the late Middle Ages. The aim of this article is to partly reconstruct this medieval discussion, as it took place in Parisian question-commentaries on Aristotle's De anima, so as to show the progression from the rejection of singular intellection in Siger of Brabant (dagger ca.1283) to the descriptivist positions of John Duns Scotus (dagger 1308) and John of Jandun (dagger 1328), and finally to the singularism of John Buridan (dagger ca.1360). All these authors accept some kind of intellectual access to individuals. Therefore, the conundrum is not whether we have some kind of intellectual knowledge of individuals, but rather whether we can know them singularly. This article begins by presenting the crucial obstacle to singular intellection in Siger. Thereafter, the author shows that Jandun and Scotus depart in fundamental ways from Siger's account, but that for them the intellection of individuals is of a general character. Finally, she proposes that Buridan is a genuine singularist.

Ämnesord

HUMANIORA  -- Filosofi, etik och religion -- Filosofi (hsv//swe)

HUMANITIES  -- Philosophy, Ethics and Religion -- Philosophy (hsv//eng)

Nyckelord

singular cognition

intellection

intelligible species

psychology

epistemology

Publikations- och innehållstyp

ref (ämneskategori)

art (ämneskategori)