| 1. |
- Arakelian, Erebouni, 1973-, et al.
(author)
-
Factors influencing early postoperative recovery after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
- 2011
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 37:10, s. 897-903
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) can prolong survival in selected patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). However, there is little data on patients' recovery process after this complex treatment. This study aimed to describe the in-hospital postoperative recovery and factors related to the recovery of patients who undergo CRS and HIPEC. METHOD: A retrospective audit of the electronic health record (EHR) was undertaken for 76 PC patients (42 women, 34 men) treated primarily with CRS and HIPEC between 2005 and 2006 in Sweden. RESULTS: Oral intake, regaining bowel functions and mobilisation usually occurred between 7 and 11 days postoperatively. Patients experienced nausea for up to 13 days postoperatively. Forty-two patients were satisfied with their pain management, which usually took the form of epidural anaesthesia and which continued for about one week post-surgery. Sleep disturbance was observed in 51 patients and psychological problems in 49 patients during the first three postoperative weeks. Tumour burden, stoma formation, use of CPAP, primary diagnosis, and the length of stay in the ICU were factors related to an early recovery process. CONCLUSION: Drinking, eating, regaining bowel functions and mobilisation were re-established within 11 days of CRS and HIPEC. Tumour burden, stoma formation, use of CPAP, primary diagnosis and the length of stay in the ICU all had an impact on postoperative recovery, and should be discussed with the patients preoperatively and taken into consideration in designing an individualised patient care plan, in order to attain a more efficient recovery.
|
|
| 2. |
|
|
| 3. |
- Andréasson, Håkan, et al.
(author)
-
Cytoreductive surgery in pseudomyxoma peritonei-aspects of the learning curve
- 2013
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 40:8, s. 930-936
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a highly invasive treatment of peritoneal metastasis and requires many surgical procedures before mastering. The aim of this study was to estimate how many procedures are needed before stabilization can be seen in surgical outcome (R1 surgery, adverse events and bleeding) in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP). Patients and methods: All 128 patients with PMP who were treated with CRS alone or CRS plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy between 2003 and 2008 at the Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, were included. The learning curve was calculated using the partial least square (PLS) and cumulative sum control chart (CUSUM) graph. Two groups were formed based on the results of the learning curve. The learning curve plateau was considered the same as the stabilization in the CUSUM graph. Group I consisted of patients included during the learning period (n = 73) and Group 11 of patients treated after the learning period ended (n = 55). Comparisons between the groups were made on surgical outcome, survival and adverse events. Results: Stabilization was seen after 220 +/- 10 procedures. A higher occurrence of R1 surgery was seen in Group H (80%) compared to Group I (48%; P = 0.0002). Overall survival increased at four years after surgery in Group H compared to Group I (80% vs. 63%; P = 0.02). Conclusion: CRS plus perioperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy is a highly demanding procedure that requires more than 200 procedures before optimisation in surgical outcome is seen.
|
|
| 4. |
- Andréasson, Håkan, et al.
(author)
-
Outcome differences between debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery in patients with pseudomyxoma peritonei
- 2012
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 38:10, s. 962-968
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- BACKGROUND:The aim of this study was to compare debulking surgery and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in patients with Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) regarding efficacy and safety.PATIENTS AND METHODS:Data were extracted from medical records and treatment outcomes were analyzed for all 152 patients with PMP who were scheduled for debulking surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) or CRS and IPC at Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden, between September 1993 and December 2008.RESULTS:One hundred and ten patients (73%) were treated with CRS and IPC and 40 (27%) with debulking surgery and IPC. In two patients (1%), surgery was defined as open and close. Patients with CRS and IPC had a 74% 5-year overall survival (OS) rate compared with 40% for those treated with debulking surgery (P < 0.001). Patients with no residual macroscopic tumour (R1 resection) had a better 5-year OS rate of 94% compared with 28% for patients with macroscopic residual tumour (R2) (P < 0.001). Grades II-IV adverse events were seen in 29% of debulked patients and in 47% of CRS/IPC patients (P = 0.053).CONCLUSIONS:CRS and IPC seems more efficient than debulking surgery and IPC but with numerically higher morbidity. Therefore, if surgically possible, CRS should be the treatment of choice for PMP patients. However, debulking surgery may still be of benefit to selected patients for palliative purposes.
|
|
| 5. |
|
|
| 6. |
- Cashin, Peter H, 1984-, et al.
(author)
-
Cytoreductive Surgery and Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Colorectal Peritoneal Carcinomatosis : Prognosis and Treatment of Recurrences in a Cohort Study
- 2012
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 38:6, s. 509-515
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IPC) treatment of colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is gaining acceptance, but controversy remains. The primary aims were to analyze the outcome and prognostic variables of colorectal PC patients treated with CRS and IPC, and to report on the outcome of additional surgical treatments of subsequent recurrences. Methods Patients referred for treatment of colorectal PC between 1996 and 2010 were included in a cohort. The following data was collected: clinicopathological parameters, survival, recurrences, perioperative chemotherapy and type of IPC (hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, HIPEC; or sequential postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy, SPIC). Multivariable analyses were conducted on potential prognostic factors for overall survival (OS). Results In the 151-patient cohort, the median OS was 34months (range: 2-77) for CRS and HIPEC with five-year survival predicted at 40% (five-year disease-free survival 32%). For CRS and SPIC, the OS was 25months (range: 2-188) with five-year survival at 18%. Open-and-close patients survived 6months (range: 0-14) with no five-year survival (HIPEC vs. SPIC p=0.047, SPIC vs. open-and-close p<0.001). Adjuvant systemic chemotherapy was a noteworthy independent prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis. OS for patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of recurrences was 25months vs. 10months with best supportive care or palliative chemotherapy (p=0.01). Conclusion Substantial long-term survival is possible in patients with colorectal PC. HIPEC was associated with better OS than SPIC and adjuvant systemic chemotherapy may improve the outcome in patients. Good OS is achievable in selected patients undergoing additional surgical treatment of isolated liver or peritoneal recurrences after prior complete CRS.
|
|
| 7. |
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
- Derwinger, Kristoffer, 1969, et al.
(author)
-
A phase I/II study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with Pemetrexed (Alimta) in rectal cancer.
- 2011
-
In: European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 1532-2157. ; 37:7, s. 583-8
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- The aim was to assess the feasibility of preoperative chemotherapy and possible tumour response using Pemetrexed (Alimta) in rectal cancer.
|
|
| 10. |
- Elliot, A. H., et al.
(author)
-
Preoperative treatment selection in rectal cancer : A population-based cohort study
- 2014
-
In: European Journal of Surgical Oncology. - : Elsevier BV. - 0748-7983 .- 1532-2157. ; 40:12, s. 1782-1788
-
Journal article (peer-reviewed)abstract
- Background: Preoperative radiotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer reduce local recurrence rates but is also associated with side effects. Thus, it is important to identify patients in whom the benefits exceed the risks. This study assessed the pretherapeutic parameters influencing the selection to preoperative treatment. Methods: Data on all patients in the Stockholm-Gotland area, Sweden, who underwent elective trans-abdominal surgery for rectal cancer in 2000-2010, was retrieved from the Regional Cancer Registry and the Swedish National Patient Register. Clinical variables were analysed in relation to selected preoperative therapy. Odds Ratios were derived from univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. Results: In total 2619 patients were included. Of these 1789 (68.3%) received preoperative radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy. Over time, use of preoperative therapy increased (p < 0.001). In a multivariable model, age (>= 80 years) and comorbidity (Charlson Comorbidity Index score >= 2) were strongly correlated to omittance of preoperative treatment (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.04-0.07 and 0.29; 95% CI: 0.21-0.39) but there was no difference between genders. Pre-treatment tumour stage was a strong predictor for selection to preoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy. However, 8.2% of patients with intermediate or advanced tumours were selected to no preoperative treatment while 55.0% of patients with early tumours were selected to preoperative therapy. Conclusions: The use of preoperative (chemo-) radiotherapy increased over time. Suboptimal adherence to guidelines appears to exist leading to a risk of overtreatment and to a small extent also undertreatment. More robust selection criteria, also including age and comorbidity should be developed.
|
|
