SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "L773:1060 0280 srt2:(2000-2004)"

Sökning: L773:1060 0280 > (2000-2004)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 10
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Björkman, Ingeborg, et al. (författare)
  • Drug-drug interactions in the elderly
  • 2002
  • Ingår i: The Annals of pharmacotherapy. - 1060-0280 .- 1542-6270. ; 36:11, s. 1675-1681
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)
  •  
2.
  • Chuc, NTK, et al. (författare)
  • Management of childhood acute respiratory infections at private pharmacies in Vietnam
  • 2001
  • Ingår i: The Annals of pharmacotherapy. - : SAGE Publications. - 1060-0280 .- 1542-6270. ; 35:10, s. 1283-1288
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • To investigate the knowledge and practice among private pharmacy staff in Hanoi regarding case management of mild acute respiratory infection (ARI) in children. METHODS: Sixty private pharmacies in Hanoi were randomly selected. Knowledge was assessed through interviews with pharmacy staff using a questionnaire; practice was assessed through the Simulated Client Method. RESULTS: In the questionnaire, 20% of the pharmacy staff stated that they would dispense antibiotics. In practice, 83% of the pharmacies dispensed antibiotics. Only 36% of the cases were handled according to guidelines. In the questionnaire, 81% of interviewees stated that antibiotics are not effective in short therapeutic courses. In practice, 48% of the antibiotics were dispensed in courses less than five days. Traditional herbal medicines were dispensed in 41% of the encounters. In the questionnaire, 53% of the pharmacy staff stated that they would ask the patient about difficulty of breathing. In practice, questions related to difficulty of breathing were asked in less than 10% of the encounters. CONCLUSIONS: Dispensing of antibiotics for mild ARI was common practice among private pharmacies, and there was a significant difference between knowledge and practice. Interventions are needed to improve pharmacy practice in Hanoi.
  •  
3.
  • Jorgensen, T, et al. (författare)
  • Prescription drug use, diagnoses, and healthcare utilization among the elderly
  • 2001
  • Ingår i: The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. - : SAGE Publications. - 1060-0280 .- 1542-6270. ; 35:9, s. 1004-1009
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • BACKGROUND More elderly patients affected by severe and chronic diseases are treated in primary care. Reports on the use of prescription drugs by the general elderly population are scarce, and more investigations are needed to optimize pharmaceutical care for these patients. OBJECTIVE To analyze prescription drug use, diagnoses, and healthcare utilization among noninstitutionalized elderly patients. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING AND PATIENTS All people > or =65 years old (n = 4642) living in the community of Tierp, Sweden, in 1994 were included. Prescription drug use and healthcare utilization have been registered for all inhabitants of the community since 1972. Information about filled prescriptions and diagnoses were obtained from a computerized research register. RESULTS Prescription drug use was high among the elderly (78%); the most used pharmacologic groups were cardiovascular, nervous system, and gastrointestinal medications. Women used more prescription drugs than men (average 4.8 vs. 3.8) and had more nonfatal diagnoses. Use of five or more different prescription drugs during 1994 was common (39.0%), and multivariate analysis showed that the greatest number of primary care visits occurred with multiple drug use (> or =5 drugs over 1 y). CONCLUSIONs: This study shows an extensive multiple drug use among elderly people living at home. Whether this multiple drug use per se is harmful to the patients or not could not be evaluated in this study. Further focused investigations are needed to assess the effect of multiple drug use in an elderly population.
  •  
4.
  • Kennerfalk, A, et al. (författare)
  • Geriatric drug therapy and healthcare utilization in the United Kingdom
  • 2002
  • Ingår i: The Annals of Pharmacotherapy. - 1060-0280 .- 1542-6270. ; 36:5, s. 797-803
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE To describe the use of prescription drug therapy, especially polypharmacy, in an elderly general population; to relate that use to age, gender, and different types of healthcare utilization; and to investigate the influence of selection of different time windows on the result of the quantity as well as the categories of drugs used. METHODS Data on a sample of 5000 patients aged 65-90 years in 1996 were derived from the General Practice Research Database (GPRD). The population covered by GPRD is broadly representative of the UK population treated in general practice. Drug use was assessed using 2 time windows - current use of individual drugs on a random day (index date) and 1 month following the index date. Healthcare utilization was analyzed by use of information on visits to general practitioners (GPs), hospitalizations, and referrals to specialists. RESULTS Women used more drugs than men; however, the prevalence of polypharmacy, defined as concomitant use of > or =5 drugs, was similar in both genders. The most frequently used therapeutic groups were cardiovascular, central nervous, and gastrointestinal system drugs. Almost 80% of both women and men visited a GP at least once a year. Overall, women used more ambulatory care services and men were hospitalized more often. Use of random date compared with 1-month period resulted in a significant underestimation of the amount of drugs used for acute conditions and, consequently, the risk of polypharmacy. CONCLUSIONS The overall results confirm the findings in earlier studies suggesting that the GPRD might be a useful tool in further studies on prescription drug use among elderly persons. More information on the appropriateness of drug use is needed to prevent overuse as well as underuse of medications among the elderly.
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  •  
8.
  • Veninga, CCM, et al. (författare)
  • Treatment of uncomplicated urinary tract infections: exploring differences in adherence to guidelines between three European countries. Drug Education Project Group
  • 2000
  • Ingår i: The Annals of pharmacotherapy. - : SAGE Publications. - 1060-0280 .- 1542-6270. ; 34:1, s. 19-26
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • To evaluate adherence of general practitioners to treatment guidelines regarding urinary tract infections in three European countries and to investigate whether differences in adherence at the prescribing level within and between countries could be explained by general practitioners' knowledge and attitudes, characteristics, or national setting. DESIGN: Prescribing data collected in 1994–1995 were analyzed regarding use of first-choice drugs and duration of treatment, knowledge and attitudes were assessed with a questionnaire, and multiple regression analysis was used to explain differences in prescribing behavior within and between countries. RESULTS: Our study is based on data from 85.6% of the 584 general practitioners who were scheduled to participate in a continuing education program. The mean proportion of responses in agreement with the guidelines regarding first-choice drugs was 0.69 in Sweden, 0.78 in the Netherlands, and 0.79 in Norway; regarding duration of treatment, the mean proportion was 0.56 in Sweden, 0.67 in the Netherlands, and 0.59 in Norway. The proportion of first-choice drugs prescribed for women (18–75 y) was 0.55 in Sweden, 0.83 in the Netherlands, and 1.00 in Norway (patients >16 y). The duration of treatment was 7.6 defined daily doses per prescription in Sweden, 5.9 in the Netherlands, and 6.6 in Norway. Knowledge and attitudes explained 0–17% of the variation in prescribing. Years in practice explained 0–11%, and the general practitioners' gender had no explanatory value. The national setting explained most of the variation between countries. CONCLUSIONS: Differences in prescribing behavior can be explained only to a small extent by deviations from the guidelines in terms of knowledge and attitudes. Between countries, differences in regulation, marketing, and distribution of drugs seem to be of much greater importance.
  •  
9.
  • Westerlund, Tommy, 1952, et al. (författare)
  • Nonprescription drug-related problems and pharmacy interventions.
  • 2001
  • Ingår i: The Annals of pharmacotherapy. - 1060-0280. ; 35:11, s. 1343-1349
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: To document the number and types of drug-related problems (DRPs) identified in customers purchasing nonprescription products in Swedish pharmacies; describe the distribution of DRPs by customer's gender, age, underlying ailment, and class of drug; determine whether problems are identified to the same extent in pharmacies with staffed nonprescription self-service departments as in pharmacies with over-the-counter sales; and document the number and types of pharmacy interventions to prevent or resolve DRPs, including reasons for drug switches and referrals to physicians. METHODS: A computerized instrument for documentation of DRPs and pharmacy interventions was developed. The study was conducted in 45 volunteer pharmacies in Sweden during ten weeks in late 1999. RESULTS: A total of 1425 problems and 2040 interventions were recorded by 308 pharmacy practitioners. Relatively fewer DRPs were documented in pharmacies with self-service departments. The most common DRPs were uncertainty about the indication for the drug (33.5%) and therapy failure (19.5%). Dyspepsia was the most frequently specified symptom (11.4%). Consumers of dermatologic products had significantly higher rates of problems than expected in relation to sales volume. The most common ways of responding to a problem were with consumer drug counseling (61.1%), switching of drugs (43.9%), and referral to a physician (27.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The study has demonstrated a need for more professional attention and intervention by pharmacy staff to prevent and rectify DRPs in nonprescription consumers. It seems especially important to make sure that consumers receive the appropriate drugs for their current ailments.
  •  
10.
  • Westerlund, Tommy, 1952, et al. (författare)
  • Pharmacy practitioners' views on computerized documentation of drug-related problems.
  • 2003
  • Ingår i: The Annals of pharmacotherapy. - 1060-0280. ; 37:3, s. 354-360
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the practice by community pharmacy practitioners of computerized documentation of drug-related problems (DRPs) and pharmacy interventions in nonprescription drug consumers. METHODS: A questionnaire was administered in December 1999 to pharmacy practitioners in 45 community pharmacies of different sizes and locations across Sweden to survey their attitudes and experiences after participation in a 10-week period of computerized DRP documentation. RESULTS: The participants (n = 376, response rate 84%) found the development of computerized documentation of DRPs and pharmacy interventions to be very important. The instrument was perceived as easy to learn and to work well in daily practice. The documentation made many practitioners more attentive to the drug-related needs of self-care consumers and changed their perception of good quality in self-care counseling. The weighted multiple linear regression analysis showed no correlation between the proportion of practitioners experiencing time constraints and the DRP documentation rate of their work site. However, the magnitude of interest in the documentation practice had a significant effect on the documentation rate, regardless of the extent of the time constraints experienced (p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: The positive findings of the evaluation speak in favor of an expanded implementation of computerized documentation of DRPs and pharmacy interventions. Commitment among participating pharmacy practitioners to the new practice is essential and appears to overcome possible time constraints.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 10

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy