SwePub
Sök i SwePub databas

  Utökad sökning

Träfflista för sökning "L773:1472 6483 OR L773:1472 6491 srt2:(2015-2019)"

Sökning: L773:1472 6483 OR L773:1472 6491 > (2015-2019)

  • Resultat 1-10 av 17
Sortera/gruppera träfflistan
   
NumreringReferensOmslagsbildHitta
1.
  • Altmae, Signe, et al. (författare)
  • Endometrial transcriptome analysis indicates superiority of natural over artificial cycles in recurrent implantation failure patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer
  • 2016
  • Ingår i: Reproductive BioMedicine Online. - : Elsevier BV. - 1472-6483 .- 1472-6491. ; 32:6, s. 597-613
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Little consensus has been reached on the best protocol for endometrial preparation for frozen embryo transfer (FET). It is not known how, and to what extent, hormone supplementation in artificial cycles influences endometrial preparation for embryo implantation at a molecular level, especially in patients who have experienced recurrent implantation failure. Transcriptome analysis of 15 endometrial biopsy samples at the time of embryo implantation was used to compare two different endometrial preparation protocols, natural versus artificial cycles, for FET in women who have experienced recurrent implantation failure compared with fertile women. IPA and DAVID were used for functional analyses of differentially expressed genes. The TRANSFAC database was used to identify oestrogen and progesterone response elements upstream of differentially expressed genes. Cluster analysis demonstrated that natural cycles are associated with a better endometrial receptivity transcriptome than artificial cycles. Artificial cycles seemed to have a stronger negative effect on expression of genes and pathways crucial for endometrial receptivity, including ESR2, FSHR, LEP, and several interleukins and matrix metalloproteinases. Significant overrepresentation of oestrogen response elements among the genes with deteriorated expression in artificial cycles (P < 0.001) was found; progesterone response elements predominated in genes with amended expression with artificial cycles (P = 0.0052).
  •  
2.
  •  
3.
  •  
4.
  • Gunnarsson Payne, Jenny, 1976- (författare)
  • Autonomy in altruistic surrogacy, conflicting kinship grammars and intentional multilineal kinship
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Reproductive BioMedicine Online. - : Elsevier. - 1472-6483 .- 1472-6491 .- 2405-6618. ; 7, s. 66-75
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • Since 1982, when the first baby conceived by in-vitro fertilization (IVF) in Sweden was born, Swedish legislation on assisted reproduction has gradually become more liberal and inclusive. Today, gamete donation and IVF are permitted not only for heterosexual couples, but also for lesbian couples and single women, and embryo donation is expected to become legalized shortly which will further increase the chances for involuntarily childless people to become parents. In recent years, the possibility of allowing surrogacy has been debated increasingly, with strongly polarized arguments both for and against it. Recent reports by the Swedish National Council of Medical Ethics and a governmental investigation agreed that the possibilities for involuntarily childless people should be increased in several ways, but reached opposing conclusions concerning surrogacy. While the former argued in favour of it (in certain circumstances), the latter argued against it (in all circumstances). One difference in their argumentation centred around the issue of bodily autonomy and self-determination in surrogacy. These two opposing conclusions raise crucial questions about what the principle of reproductive intent implies for questions concerning reproductive autonomy in surrogacy. Does it matter when in the reproductive process the declaration of intent is made, and what happens if we consider the possibility of changing intentions in relation to autonomy and self-determination in surrogacy? Is the mater est rule compatible with an intersectional, queer and non-discriminatory approach to reproductive justice, and if so, under what circumstances? Are there any possibilities of thinking beyond the ‘either/or’ between these two principles?
  •  
5.
  •  
6.
  •  
7.
  • Karlström, Per-Olof, et al. (författare)
  • Does ovarian stimulation regimen affect IVF outcome? : a two-centre, real-world retrospective study using predominantly cleavage-stage, single embryo transfer
  • 2018
  • Ingår i: Reproductive BioMedicine Online. - : ELSEVIER SCI LTD. - 1472-6483 .- 1472-6491. ; 36:1, s. 59-66
  • Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
    • In this study, ovarian stimulation using highly purified human menopausal gonadotrophin (HP-HMG) and recombinant FSH (rFSH) for IVF were compared in two large assisted reproduction technique centres in Sweden. A total of 5902 women underwent 9631 oocyte retrievals leading to 8818 embryo transfers (7720 on day 2): single embryo transfers (74.2%); birth rate per embryo transfer (27.7%); multiple birth rate (5.0%); incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (0.71%). Compared with ovarian stimulation with rFSH, women who received HP-HMG were older, had higher dosages of gonadotrophins administered, fewer oocytes retrieved and more embryos transferred. After multivariate analysis controlling for age and generalized estimating equation model, no differences were found in delivery outcomes per embryo transfers between HP-HMG and rFSH, independent of gonadotrophin releasing hormone analogue (GnRH) used. Logit curves for live birth rate suggested differences for various subgroups, most prominently for women with high oocyte yield or when high total doses were used. Differences were not significant, perhaps owing to skewed distributions of the FSH compounds versus age and other covariates. These 'real-life patients' had no differences in live birth rate between HP-HMG and rFSH overall or in subgroups of age, embryo score, ovarian sensitivity or use of GnRH analogue regimen.
  •  
8.
  •  
9.
  •  
10.
  •  
Skapa referenser, mejla, bekava och länka
  • Resultat 1-10 av 17

Kungliga biblioteket hanterar dina personuppgifter i enlighet med EU:s dataskyddsförordning (2018), GDPR. Läs mer om hur det funkar här.
Så här hanterar KB dina uppgifter vid användning av denna tjänst.

 
pil uppåt Stäng

Kopiera och spara länken för att återkomma till aktuell vy