| 1. |
|
|
| 2. |
- Abbassi, Fariba, et al.
(författare)
-
Novel Benchmark Values for Redo Liver Transplantation Does the Outcome Justify the Effort?
- 2022
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 276:5, s. 860-867
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To define benchmark cutoffs for redo liver transplantation (redo-LT). Background: In the era of organ shortage, redo-LT is frequently discussed in terms of expected poor outcome and wasteful resources. However, there is a lack of benchmark data to reliably evaluate outcomes after redo-LT. Methods: We collected data on redo-LT between January 2010 and December 2018 from 22 high-volume transplant centers. Benchmark cases were defined as recipients with model of end stage liver disease (MELD) score <= 25, absence of portal vein thrombosis, no mechanical ventilation at the time of surgery, receiving a graft from a donor after brain death. Also, high-urgent priority and early redo-LT including those for primary nonfunction (PNF) or hepatic artery thrombosis were excluded. Benchmark cutoffs were derived from the 75th percentile of the medians of all benchmark centers. Results: Of 1110 redo-LT, 373 (34%) cases qualified as benchmark cases. Among these cases, the rate of postoperative complications until discharge was 76%, and increased up to 87% at 1-year, respectively. One-year overall survival rate was excellent with 90%. Benchmark cutoffs included Comprehensive Complication Index CCI (R) at 1-year of <= 72, and in-hospital and 1-year mortality rates of <= 13% and <= 15%, respectively. In contrast, patients who received a redo-LT for PNF showed worse outcomes with some values dramatically outside the redoLT benchmarks. Conclusion: This study shows that redo-LT achieves good outcome when looking at benchmark scenarios. However, this figure changes in high-risk redo-LT, as for example in PNF. This analysis objectifies for the first-time results and efforts for redo-LT and can serve as a basis for discussion about the use of scarce resources.
|
|
| 3. |
- Agger, E, et al.
(författare)
-
Circumferential Resection Margin is Associated with Distant Metastasis After Rectal Cancer Surgery : A Nation-Wide Population-Based Study Cohort
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - 1528-1140. ; 277:2, s. 346-352
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To evaluate circumferential resection margin (CRM) as a risk factor for distant metastasis (DM) in rectal cancer.SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: The treatment of rectal cancer has evolved over the last decades. Surgical radicality is considered the most important factor in preventing recurrences including local and distant. CRM ≤1.0 mm is considered to increase recurrence risk. This study explores the risk of DM in relation to exact CRM.METHODS: All patients treated with abdominal resection surgery for rectal cancer between 2005 and 2013 in Sweden were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective study. Primary endpoint was DM.RESULTS: 12146 cases were identified. 8593 cases were analysed after exclusion. 717 (8.6%) patients had CRM ≤1.0 mm and 7577 (91.4%) patients CRM >1.0 mm. DM recurrence rate at 5 years was 42.1% (95% CI 32.5-50.3), 31.5% (95% CI 27.3-35.5), 25.8% (95% CI 16.2-34.4) and 19.5% (95% CI 18.5-19.5) when CRM was 0.0 mm, 0.1-1.0 mm, 1.1-1.9 mm and CRM ≥2 mm respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed higher DM risk in CRM 0.0-1.0 mm versus >1.0 mm (HR 1.28, 95% c.i. 1.06 to 1.56; P=<0.011). No significant difference in DM risk in CRM 1.1 - 1.9 mm versus ≥2.0 mm (HR 0.66, 95% c.i. 0.34 to 1.28; P=0.224) could be detected.CONCLUSIONS: The risk of DM decreases with increasing CRM. Moreover, CRM ≤1.0 mm is a significant risk factor for DM. Thus, CRM is a dominant factor when discussing risk of DM after rectal cancer surgery.
|
|
| 4. |
- Agger, Erik, et al.
(författare)
-
Negative prognostic impact of tumor deposits in rectal cancer – a national study cohort
- 2023
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - 1528-1140. ; 273:3, s. 526-533
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: To investigate whether tumor deposits (TDs) in rectal cancer are associated withincreased recurrence risk and decreased survival.Summary background data: Tumor deposits (TDs) are considered a risk factor forrecurrence after colon cancer resection and presence of TDs prompts adjuvant chemotherapy.The prognostic relevance of TDs in rectal cancer requires further exploration.Methods: All patients treated with abdominal resection surgery for rectal cancer in Swedenbetween 2011 and 2014 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort-study based onprospectively collected data from the Swedish ColoRectal Cancer Registry. Primary endpointwas local recurrence or distant metastasis. Secondary outcomes were overall and relativesurvival.Results: 5455 patients were identified. 3769 patients were analysed after exclusion. TDs werefound in 404 (10.7%) patients including where 140 (3.7%) patients with had N1c-status. InTD-positive patients, local recurrence and distant metastasis rates at 5 years were 6.3% [95%CI 3.8-8.8%] and 38.9% [95% CI, 33.6-43.5%] compared to 2.7% [95% CI, 2.1-3.3%] and14.3% [95% CI, 13.1-15.5%] in TD-negative patients. In multivariable regression analysis,risk of local recurrence and distant metastasis were increased; HR 1.86 [95% CI, 1.09-3.19;P=0.024] and 1.87 [95% CI, 1.52-2.31; P=was 68.8% [95% CI, 64.4-73.4%] in TD-positive patients and 80.7% [95% CI, 79.4-82.1%] inTD-negative patients. pN1c-patients had similar outcomes regarding local recurrence, distantCopyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. Unauthorized reproduction of the article is prohibited.ACCEPTEDmetastasis and survival as pN1a-b stage patients. TD-positive pN1a-b patients hadsignificantly worse outcomes while TDs did not affect outcomes in pN2a-b patients.Conclusion: This study suggests that TDs have a negative impact on prognosis in rectalcancer. Thus, efforts should be made to diagnose TD-positive rectal cancer patientspreoperatively.
|
|
| 5. |
- Ahl, Rebecka, 1987-, et al.
(författare)
-
β-Blockade in Rectal Cancer Surgery : A Simple Measure of Improving Outcomes
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 271:1, s. 140-146
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To ascertain whether regular β-blocker exposure can improve short- and long-term outcomes after rectal cancer surgery.BACKGROUND: Surgery for rectal cancer is associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. There is increasing evidence to suggest that there is a survival benefit in patients exposed to β-blockers undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Studies investigating the effects on outcomes in patients subjected to surgery for rectal cancer are lacking.METHODS: All adult patients undergoing elective abdominal resection for rectal cancer over a 10-year period were recruited from the prospectively collected Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Patients were subdivided according to preoperative β-blocker exposure status. Outcomes of interest were 30-day complications, 30-day cause-specific mortality, and 1-year all-cause mortality. The association between β-blocker use and outcomes were analyzed using Poisson regression model with robust standard errors for 30-day complications and cause-specific mortality. One-year survival was assessed using Cox proportional hazards regression model.RESULTS: A total of 11,966 patients were included in the current study, of whom 3513 (29.36%) were exposed to regular preoperative β-blockers. A significant decrease in 30-day mortality was detected (incidence rate ratio = 0.06, 95% confidence interval: 0.03-0.13, P < 0.001). Deaths of cardiovascular nature, respiratory origin, sepsis, and multiorgan failure were significantly lower in β-blocker users, as were the incidences in postoperative infection and anastomotic failure. The β-blocker positive group had significantly better survival up to 1 year postoperatively with a risk reduction of 57% (hazard ratio = 0.43, 95% confidence interval: 0.37-0.52, P < 0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative β-blocker use is strongly associated with improved survival and morbidity after abdominal resection for rectal cancer.
|
|
| 6. |
- Annebäck, Matilda, et al.
(författare)
-
Risk of Permanent Hypoparathyroidism After Total Thyroidectomy for Benign Disease : A Nationwide Population-based Cohort Study From Sweden
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 274:6, s. e1202-e1208
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for permanent hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy for benign disease in a population-based setting with data independent of input of complication data.SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The reported rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism is highly variable and mostly rely on reported complication data from national or institutional registries.METHODS: All patients who underwent total thyroidectomy in Sweden from 2005 to 2015 were identified through Scandinavian Quality Register for Thyroid, Parathyroid and Adrenal Surgery and the Swedish National Patient Register. Patients were matched to outcome data from the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register. Permanent hypoparathyroidism was defined as treatment with calcium and/or active vitamin D more than 1 year after surgery.RESULTS: Seven thousand eight hundred fifty-two patients were included and 938 (12.5%) developed permanent hypoparathyroidism. The risk was lower in patients registered in the quality register (11.0% vs 16%, P < 0.001). In a multivariable analysis there was a higher risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism in patients with parathyroid autotransplantation [Odds ratio (OR) 1.72; 95% confidence interval 1.47-2.01], center-volume <100 thyroidectomies per year (OR 1.22; 1.03-1.44), age above 60 year (OR 1.64; 1.36-1.98) and female sex (OR 1.27; 1.05-1.54). Reported data from the quality register only identified 178 of all 938 patients with permanent hypoparathyroidism.CONCLUSION: The risk of permanent hypoparathyroidism after total thyroidectomy was high and associated with parathyroid autotransplantation, higher age, female sex and surgery at a low volume center. Reported follow-up data might underestimate the rate of permanent hypoparathyroidism.
|
|
| 7. |
- Asbun, H.J., et al.
(författare)
-
The Miami International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection
- 2020
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 271:1
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and externally validate the first evidence-based guidelines on minimally invasive pancreas resection (MIPR) before and during the International Evidence-based Guidelines on Minimally Invasive Pancreas Resection (IG-MIPR) meeting in Miami (March 2019).Summary Background Data: MIPR has seen rapid development in the past decade. Promising outcomes have been reported by early adopters from high-volume centers. Subsequently, multicenter series as well as randomized controlled trials were reported; however, guidelines for clinical practice were lacking. Methods: The Scottisch Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) methodology was used, incorporating these 4 items: systematic reviews using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to answer clinical questions, whenever possible in PICO style, the GRADE approach for assessment of the quality of evidence, the Delphi method for establishing consensus on the developed recommendations, and the AGREE-II instrument for the assessment of guideline quality and external validation. The current guidelines are cosponsored by the International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the Asian-Pacific Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association, the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Pancreas Club, the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgery, the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract, and the Society of Surgical Oncology. Results: After screening 16,069 titles, 694 studies were reviewed, and 291 were included. The final 28 recommendations covered 6 topics; laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomy, central pancreatectomy, pancreatoduodenectomy, as well as patient selection, training, learning curve, and minimal annual center volume required to obtain optimal outcomes and patient safety.Conclusion: The IG-MIPR using SIGN methodology give guidance to surgeons, hospital administrators, patients, and medical societies on the use and outcome of MIPR as well as the approach to be taken regarding this challenging type of surgery. © 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
|
| 8. |
|
|
| 9. |
|
|
| 10. |
- Boström, Petrus, et al.
(författare)
-
Oncological Impact of High Vascular Tie After Surgery for Rectal Cancer : A Nationwide Cohort Study
- 2021
-
Ingår i: Annals of Surgery. - : Wolters Kluwer. - 0003-4932 .- 1528-1140. ; 274:3, s. e236-e244
-
Tidskriftsartikel (refereegranskat)abstract
- Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of tie level on oncological outcomes in rectal cancer surgery.Summary background data: Theoretically, a high tie of the inferior mesenteric artery could facilitate removal of apical node metastases and improve tumor staging accuracy. However, no appropriately sized randomized controlled trial exists and results from observational studies are not consistent.Methods: All stage I–III rectal cancer patients who underwent abdominal surgery with curative intention in 2007 to 2014 were identified and followed, using the Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry. Primary outcome was cancer-specific survival, whereas overall and relative survival, locoregional and distant recurrence, and lymph node harvest were secondary outcomes, with high tie as exposure. We used propensity score matching to emulate a randomized controlled trial, and then performed Cox regression analyses to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with confidence intervals (CIs).Results: Some 8287 patients remained for analysis, of which 37% had high tie surgery. After propensity score matching, the 5-year cancer-specific survival rate was overall 86% and we found no association between the level of tie and cancer-specific (HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.79–1.07) or overall (HR 0.98, 95% CI 0.89–1.08) survival, nor to locoregional (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.59–1.23) or distant (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.88–1.15) recurrence, nor to relative survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.85–1.28). Stratification and sensitivity analyses were similarly insignificant, after adjustment for confounding. Total lymph node harvest was, however, increased after high tie surgery (P < 0.01), but no differences were seen regarding positive nodes (P = 0.72).Conclusion: In this nationwide cohort study, the level of tie did not influence any patient-oriented oncological outcome, neither overall nor in node-positive patients. This would allow the patient's anatomical configuration and the surgeon's preferences to determine the level of tie.
|
|
